Issue · Energy

Energy

Every energy bill, vote, and legislator stance in North Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
13
69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26)
Top supporter
Austin Foss
82% support rate
Top opponent
Dan Johnston
18% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving energy in North Dakota

Legislators moving energy in North Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Austin Foss
Austin Foss House · District 44
D
Strong +
82% 11
Karla Rose Hanson
Karla Rose Hanson House · District 44
D
Strong +
82% 11
Ty Dressler
Ty Dressler House · District 36
R
Strong +
80% 10
Gretchen Dobervich
Gretchen Dobervich House · District 11
D
Support
78% 9
Collette Brown
Collette Brown House · District 9
D
Support
75% 8
Dan Johnston
Dan Johnston House · District 24
R
Strong −
18% 11
Andrew Marschall
Andrew Marschall House · District 16
R
Oppose
25% 8
Lori VanWinkle
Lori VanWinkle House · District 3
R
Oppose
27% 11
Nico Rios
Nico Rios House · District 23
R
Oppose
27% 11
Karen Anderson
Karen Anderson House · District 19
R
Oppose
30% 10
Showing 11–13 of 13 bills

All energy bills

failed · North Dakota · House Feb 14, 2025

HB 1292: A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact sections 49-19-01, 49-19-11, and 49-19-19 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to eliminating a carbon dioxide pipelines' owners', operators', or managers' status as a common pipeline carrier.

HB 1292 would remove carbon dioxide pipelines from being classified as "common pipeline carriers" under North Dakota law. This change directly affects owners and operators of CO2 pipelines by exempting them from requirements to transport any customer's CO2 without discrimination at set rates. The bill amends sections 49-19-01, 49-19-11, and 49-19-19 of the North Dakota Century Code to exclude CO2 pipelines from the definition and rules governing common carriers. This policy shift modifies how CO2 pipeline operations are regulated, separating them from traditional oil/gas pipeline common carrier obligations.
failed · North Dakota · House Feb 14, 2025

HB 1295: A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact subsection 3 of section 54-35-26 and sections 57-40.2-03.3 and 57-60-06 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the evaluation of economic development tax incentives, the carbon dioxide capture and injection use tax exemption, and the ad valorem property tax exemption for carbon dioxide capture equipment used for enhanced oil recovery and secure geologic storage; to repeal sections 57-06-17.1, 57-06-17.2, and 57-39.2-04.14 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the carbon dioxide pipeline exemption, payments in lieu of taxes for certain carbon dioxide pipeline property, and the carbon dioxide capture and injection sales tax exemption; and to provide an effective date.

Relating to the evaluation of economic development tax incentives, the carbon dioxide capture and injection use tax exemption, and the ad valorem property tax exemption for carbon dioxide capture equipment used for enhanced oil recovery and secure geologic storage; to repeal sections 57‑06‑17.1, 57‑06‑17.2, and 57‑39.2‑04.14 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the carbon dioxide pipeline exemption, payments in lieu of taxes for certain carbon dioxide pipeline property, and the carbon dioxide capture and injection sales tax exemption; and to provide an effective date.
failed · North Dakota · House Jan 31, 2025

HB 1309: A BILL for an Act to create and enact a new section to chapter 54-06 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to state contracts with certain companies that boycott energy, mining, and production agriculture; and to provide for application.

HB 1309 would require North Dakota state agencies to verify that companies they contract with do not boycott energy (including fossil fuels), mining, production agriculture, or firearms industries. Companies must confirm they aren’t refusing business with entities in these sectors to penalize them, as defined by the bill. This applies to for-profit businesses with 10+ employees and $100,000+ in value. Exceptions exist if services aren’t commercially available or if the contract conflicts with legal duties. The bill is pending, having failed committee review in January 2025.
Showing 11 to 13 of 13 bills