Issue · Technology

Technology

Every technology bill, vote, and legislator stance in New Hampshire, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
54
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Denise DeDe-Poulin
100% support rate
Top opponent
Chris Herbert
11% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving technology in New Hampshire

Legislators moving technology in New Hampshire
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Denise DeDe-Poulin
Denise DeDe-Poulin House · District Strafford 6
R
Strong +
100% 34
Bob Lynn
Bob Lynn House · District Rockingham 17
R
Strong +
89% 55
J.D. Bernardy
J.D. Bernardy House · District Rockingham 36
R
Strong +
89% 55
Wayne MacDonald
Wayne MacDonald House · District Rockingham 16
R
Strong +
89% 55
Dennis Mannion
Dennis Mannion House · District Rockingham 25
R
Strong +
89% 55
Chris Herbert
Chris Herbert House · District Hillsborough 24
D
Strong −
11% 48
Christine Seibert
Christine Seibert House · District Hillsborough 21
D
Strong −
12% 52
Dale Swanson
Dale Swanson House · District Hillsborough 5
D
Strong −
14% 39
Stephanie Grund
Stephanie Grund House · District Hillsborough 34
D
Strong −
14% 49
Marc Plamondon
Marc Plamondon House · District Hillsborough 3
D
Strong −
14% 44
Showing 51–54 of 54 bills

All technology bills

signed · New Hampshire · Senate May 29, 2026

SB 622: relative to the offense of identity fraud.

SB 622 expands New Hampshire's identity fraud law to explicitly protect businesses, government agencies, and other organizations (referred to as "entities") alongside individuals. It adds a clear definition of "entity" to include corporations, trusts, government bodies, and their departments, and updates the offense to cover fraud committed against these entities. The bill makes it a crime to obtain or use someone's personal information (like account numbers or passwords) without authorization to impersonate an entity or assist others in doing so. This change directly affects organizations that could face financial harm from identity fraud targeting their accounts or data. The law takes effect January 1, 2027, with no estimated state or local cost impact.
Sub-Topics Data Privacy
failed · New Hampshire · House Mar 11, 2026

HB 1658: relative to parental consent and age verification for digital application platforms.

HB 1658 requires app stores operating in New Hampshire to verify users' age categories (e.g., child, teenager) and obtain parental consent for minors under 18. It mandates that app stores create "minor accounts" (for users under 18) linked to "parent accounts" (for adults), and disclose key information like an app's age rating, content description, data collection practices, and data protection methods to parents before consent. The bill also requires re-obtaining parental consent for significant app changes, such as new in-app purchases or altered data collection. This law directly affects app store providers (e.g., Apple App Store, Google Play), app developers, and parents of minors in New Hampshire.
signed · New Hampshire · House Jun 1, 2026

HB 1444: relative to the purchase or acquisition of certain unmanned aircraft systems.

HB 1444 requires New Hampshire state agencies and local governments (counties, cities, towns) to stop purchasing or acquiring drones not on an official "cleared list" after January 1, 2028. The bill mandates the Department of Safety to create and maintain a public list of security-compliant drones by that date, including models cleared by the Defense Department, meeting federal security standards, or proven incapable of unauthorized data transmission. All state and local procurement must prioritize drones on this list, with contracts for non-listed drones deemed void. The bill has no new funding impact, as noted in its fiscal analysis.
Sub-Topics Emerging Technology
died · New Hampshire · House Aug 20, 2026

HB 1317: relative to patient privacy protections.

HB 1317 strengthens patient privacy protections in New Hampshire by prohibiting state agencies, contractors, vendors, and grant recipients from sharing personally identifiable medical, disability, or mental health data with the federal government or third parties - unless specific conditions apply. These exceptions include obtaining an individual’s written consent, complying with existing law or court orders, or disclosing data to provide necessary health care services. The bill also requires that any permitted disclosure share only the minimum necessary data and prioritize de-identified information when possible. It explicitly affirms that these state rules do not override federal privacy laws like HIPAA or the ADA, and violations could result in civil penalties enforced by the attorney general.
Sub-Topics Mental Health
Showing 51 to 54 of 54 bills
Previous 1 4 5 6