Issue · Labor & Employment

Labor & Employment (Labor Standards)

Every labor & employment bill, vote, and legislator stance in New Hampshire, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Jim Maggiore
100% support rate
Top opponent
Dan McGuire
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving labor standards in New Hampshire

Legislators moving labor standards in New Hampshire
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Jim Maggiore
Jim Maggiore House · District Rockingham 23
D
Strong +
100% 4
Dave Nagel
Dave Nagel House · District Belknap 6
D
Strong +
100% 3
Linda Ryan
Linda Ryan House · District Hillsborough 4
D
Strong +
100% 3
Myles England
Myles England House · District Strafford 12
D
Strong +
100% 3
Alexis Simpson
Alexis Simpson House · District Rockingham 33
D
Support
75% 4
Dan McGuire
Dan McGuire House · District Merrimack 14
R
Strong −
0% 3
James Tierney
James Tierney House · District Coos 1
R
Strong −
0% 3
Jeff Tenczar
Jeff Tenczar House · District Hillsborough 1
R
Strong −
0% 3
Joe Guthrie
Joe Guthrie House · District Rockingham 15
R
Strong −
0% 3
Katy Peternel
Katy Peternel House · District Carroll 6
R
Strong −
0% 3
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All labor & employment bills

vetoed · New Hampshire · House Aug 19, 2026

HB 1072: relative to employer notice of department of labor investigations.

HB 1072 requires New Hampshire's Department of Labor to provide employers with at least 30 days' written notice before conducting inspections or requesting documents/interviews. The notice must specify the inspection's purpose, whether it relates to a complaint, and any alleged labor law violations. Employers would then have 30 days to respond to such requests, regardless of whether a complaint was filed. Exceptions allowing shorter notice require attorney general approval only for recent violations (within 36 months), imminent health/safety risks, or evidence destruction concerns.
Sub-Topics Labor Standards
signed · New Hampshire · House Jul 21, 2026

HB 1168: relative to employer documentation requirements.

HB 1168 extends the time employers have to respond to wage claims from 10 days to 30 days after receiving notice. This change directly affects employers who receive claims from employees alleging unpaid wages. The bill modifies RSA 275:51 by updating the deadline for employers to file written objections to such claims. If employers don't respond within the new 30-day window, the commissioner may order payment without further delay. This is a procedural adjustment to the existing wage enforcement process.
Sub-Topics Labor Standards
passed both · New Hampshire · House May 7, 2026

HB 1043: relative to employer discretion in offering minimum payment options to employees.

HB 1043 allows employers to create their own pay policies for employees who report to work at the employer's request, making the existing statutory minimum pay requirement (2 hours' pay at regular rate) apply only if the employer has no alternative policy. It directly affects most private-sector employees who report to work, excluding county/municipal employees and ski resort instructors who receive equivalent alternative compensation. The bill does not change the minimum pay standard but gives employers flexibility to set higher or different policies that meet or exceed the baseline. Employers who make a good-faith effort to notify employees not to report to work are not liable for pay under this section. The bill amends RSA 275:43-a and takes effect 60 days after passage.
failed · New Hampshire · House Mar 11, 2026

HB 1471: relative to changes to the state retirement system.

HB 1471 updates the retirement benefit calculation for New Hampshire police and fire personnel (Group II members) who began service before July 1, 2011, and were not vested by January 1, 2012. It aligns their "average final compensation" formula with the method established in HB 2 (2025), limiting how extra pay (like overtime) is included in retirement calculations. Specifically, it caps the inclusion of special duty pay in the highest 5 years of service to match the average over the member’s last 5 years of service after January 1, 2012. This change has no new fiscal impact, as it implements an existing calculation method already approved in 2025.