Issue · Immigration

Immigration (Sanctuary Policies)

Every immigration bill, vote, and legislator stance in New Hampshire, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
3
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Bob Harb
75% support rate
Top opponent
Allan Howland
25% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving sanctuary policies in New Hampshire

Legislators moving sanctuary policies in New Hampshire
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Bob Harb
Bob Harb House · District Rockingham 20
R
Support
75% 4
Donald McFarlane
Donald McFarlane House · District Grafton 18
R
Support
75% 4
Jess Edwards
Jess Edwards House · District Rockingham 31
R
Support
75% 4
Jim Spillane
Jim Spillane House · District Rockingham 2
R
Support
75% 4
Joe Hamblen
Joe Hamblen House · District Carroll 3
R
Support
75% 4
Allan Howland
Allan Howland House · District Strafford 20
D
Oppose
25% 4
Linda Harriott-Gathright
Linda Harriott-Gathright House · District Hillsborough 10
D
Oppose
25% 4
Linda Haskins
Linda Haskins House · District Rockingham 11
D
Oppose
25% 4
Matt Coker
Matt Coker House · District Belknap 2
R
Oppose
25% 4
Patricia Cornell
Patricia Cornell House · District Hillsborough 22
D
Oppose
25% 4
Showing 3 of 3 bills

All immigration bills

failed · New Hampshire · Senate Jan 7, 2026

SB 71: relative to cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

SB 71, the "Anti-Sanctuary City Act," prohibits New Hampshire local governments (counties, municipalities, and other local entities) from blocking state or federal law enforcement from complying with federal immigration laws (Title 8 of the U.S. Code). The bill allows the state Attorney General to sue local entities that violate this law, seeking court-ordered remedies including injunctions and fines up to 25% of the local entity’s state funds from the previous fiscal year. Violations would require the Attorney General to specify the violating policy in court findings. The law takes effect January 1, 2026, and does not impose direct costs on the state but may require Attorney General resources for enforcement.
failed · New Hampshire · House Mar 13, 2026

HB 1609: limiting the use of state, county, and municipal funds and property for construction and operation of certain immigrant detention facilities.

HB 1609 prohibits New Hampshire state, county, and municipal governments from using public funds or property to build, operate, or pay for immigrant detention facilities, particularly those managed by private companies. It bans spending on construction, renovation, repurposing public property for detention, selling public property for such use, and making payments to private detention operators. The bill does not affect existing 287(g) agreements between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities or the provision of health and safety services to detained individuals. Counties may face potential revenue losses if they stop cooperating with federal immigration programs, but municipalities are not expected to have financial impacts.
passed both · New Hampshire · House Jun 4, 2026

HB 1709: prohibiting certain unlawfully present felons from occupying or renting real property, relative to pet vendor foster home and defining pet vendor foster facility, and providing procedures for the potential confiscation of livestock involved in cruelty to animal cases.

HB 1709 requires residential rental applicants in New Hampshire to disclose in writing if they are not U.S. citizens or lawfully present in the United States. Applicants can prove lawful presence using specific documents like a New Hampshire driver's license, tribal ID, or federal identification, and landlords cannot independently verify immigration status. Violating this disclosure requirement is classified as a class B felony. The bill directly affects renters applying for housing and landlords managing residential properties in New Hampshire.