Issue · Immigration

Immigration

Every immigration bill, vote, and legislator stance in New Hampshire, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Efstathia Booras
80% support rate
Top opponent
Matt Coker
22% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving immigration in New Hampshire

Legislators moving immigration in New Hampshire
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Efstathia Booras
Efstathia Booras House · District Hillsborough 8
D
Strong +
80% 5
Heath Howard
Heath Howard House · District Strafford 4
D
Support
73% 11
James Roesener
James Roesener House · District Merrimack 22
D
Support
70% 10
Mark Vallone
Mark Vallone House · District Rockingham 5
D
Support
69% 13
Mark MacKenzie
Mark MacKenzie House · District Hillsborough 40
D
Support
67% 12
Matt Coker
Matt Coker House · District Belknap 2
R
Oppose
22% 9
Beth Richards
Beth Richards House · District Merrimack 17
D
Oppose
29% 7
Jeff Tenczar
Jeff Tenczar House · District Hillsborough 1
R
Oppose
33% 9
Travis Toner
Travis Toner House · District Belknap 4
R
Oppose
33% 9
Adam Presa
Adam Presa House · District Hillsborough 12
R
Oppose
33% 6
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All immigration bills

died · New Hampshire · House Aug 20, 2026

HB 1822: relative to reporting of civil immigration detentions by state, county, and local law enforcement and correctional facilities.

HB 1822 requires state, county, and local law enforcement agencies and correctional facilities to submit semi-annual reports to the Attorney General about individuals detained for civil immigration violations (including under immigration detainers or federal 287(g) agreements). Reports must include the number of people detained and the length of each detention, with the first reports due December 31, 2026. The Attorney General must then summarize this data in a semi-annual report to the Governor, Senate President, and House Speaker, starting February 1, 2027. The bill imposes no new funding but notes potential administrative costs for the Attorney General’s office.
died · New Hampshire · House Aug 20, 2026

HB 1317: relative to patient privacy protections.

HB 1317 strengthens patient privacy protections in New Hampshire by prohibiting state agencies, contractors, vendors, and grant recipients from sharing personally identifiable medical, disability, or mental health data with the federal government or third parties - unless specific conditions apply. These exceptions include obtaining an individual’s written consent, complying with existing law or court orders, or disclosing data to provide necessary health care services. The bill also requires that any permitted disclosure share only the minimum necessary data and prioritize de-identified information when possible. It explicitly affirms that these state rules do not override federal privacy laws like HIPAA or the ADA, and violations could result in civil penalties enforced by the attorney general.
passed both · New Hampshire · House Jun 4, 2026

HB 1709: prohibiting certain unlawfully present felons from occupying or renting real property, relative to pet vendor foster home and defining pet vendor foster facility, and providing procedures for the potential confiscation of livestock involved in cruelty to animal cases.

HB 1709 requires residential rental applicants in New Hampshire to disclose in writing if they are not U.S. citizens or lawfully present in the United States. Applicants can prove lawful presence using specific documents like a New Hampshire driver's license, tribal ID, or federal identification, and landlords cannot independently verify immigration status. Violating this disclosure requirement is classified as a class B felony. The bill directly affects renters applying for housing and landlords managing residential properties in New Hampshire.
failed · New Hampshire · House Mar 13, 2026

HB 1609: limiting the use of state, county, and municipal funds and property for construction and operation of certain immigrant detention facilities.

HB 1609 prohibits New Hampshire state, county, and municipal governments from using public funds or property to build, operate, or pay for immigrant detention facilities, particularly those managed by private companies. It bans spending on construction, renovation, repurposing public property for detention, selling public property for such use, and making payments to private detention operators. The bill does not affect existing 287(g) agreements between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities or the provision of health and safety services to detained individuals. Counties may face potential revenue losses if they stop cooperating with federal immigration programs, but municipalities are not expected to have financial impacts.