Issue · Education

Education (School Funding)

Every education bill, vote, and legislator stance in New Hampshire, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Russ Dumais
100% support rate
Top opponent
Geoff Smith
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving school funding in New Hampshire

Legislators moving school funding in New Hampshire
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Russ Dumais
Russ Dumais House · District Belknap 6
R
Strong +
100% 8
Bill Gannon
Bill Gannon Senate · District 23
R
Strong +
100% 3
Dan Innis
Dan Innis Senate · District 7
R
Strong +
100% 3
Daryl Abbas
Daryl Abbas Senate · District 22
R
Strong +
100% 3
David Rochefort
David Rochefort Senate · District 1
R
Strong +
100% 3
Geoff Smith
Geoff Smith House · District Strafford 21
D
Strong −
0% 5
Cindy Rosenwald
Cindy Rosenwald Senate · District 13
D
Strong −
0% 3
David Watters
David Watters Senate · District 4
D
Strong −
0% 3
Debra Altschiller
Debra Altschiller Senate · District 24
D
Strong −
0% 3
Donovan Fenton
Donovan Fenton Senate · District 10
D
Strong −
0% 3
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All education bills

died · New Hampshire · House Aug 20, 2026

HCR 11: declaring the directives of the judicial branch in the Claremont cases that the legislative and executive branches define an "adequate education," adopt "standards of accountability," and "guarantee adequate funding" of a public education are not binding on the legislative and executive branches.

HCR 11 is a procedural resolution declaring that New Hampshire's legislative and executive branches are not bound by judicial directives from the Claremont school funding cases requiring them to define "adequate education," establish "standards of accountability," or guarantee public school funding. It asserts these court mandates violate the separation of powers outlined in the state constitution, arguing the judiciary overstepped by directing policy decisions properly within the elected branches' authority. The resolution states the legislature and governor retain sole responsibility for setting education policy, including funding levels, without judicial oversight on "adequacy" or specific implementation. As a concurrent resolution, it does not change laws but formally states the branches' position on judicial overreach.
Sub-Topics School Funding
failed · New Hampshire · House Feb 5, 2026

HB 1104: modifying the priority of applications for school building aid grants.

HB 1104 changes how New Hampshire school districts and chartered public schools are ranked for building aid grants. It removes the previous rule that automatically prioritized applications from the prior year that didn't receive funding due to budget limits, as well as applications with "critical needs" (like unsafe conditions). Instead, all applications will now be ranked solely based on the standard scoring criteria outlined in the law, including factors like unsafe facilities, overcrowding, ADA compliance, and school district fiscal capacity. This change affects every school district applying for building aid grants by altering the ranking process used to determine funding order.
Sub-Topics School Funding
in committee · New Hampshire · House Mar 12, 2026

HB 1288: relative to enabling school administrative units to adopt budget caps.

HB 1288 allows New Hampshire school administrative units to set annual budget caps for their operations. The cap is calculated using the previous year's overhead cost per student (adjusted for inflation via a standard index) multiplied by average daily student enrollment across all member districts. If a school district's proposed budget exceeds this cap, voters must approve an override with a 3/5 majority vote; otherwise, the cap amount automatically becomes the adopted budget. This applies to any school administrative unit that chooses to adopt the cap, directly affecting how school budgets are set and approved within those units.
signed · New Hampshire · Senate Jun 24, 2026

SB 507: establishing a committee to study violence in schools directed at staff members and the obstacles to disciplining or expelling students in such circumstances.

SB 507 limits school districts' financial responsibility for continuing education services for students expelled due to assaulting school staff. It requires districts to cover only the average per-pupil cost for such students, rather than full educational expenses. The bill does not change expulsion rules or relieve parents of their obligation to educate their children. This applies specifically to students expelled for assault against staff and takes effect 60 days after enactment.