SJR 2 proposes a constitutional amendment changing how unopposed judicial elections are conducted in Nevada. It would require that when an incumbent justice or judge (in the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, or district courts) runs without opposition, ballots must offer only "retain" or "not retain" options. If "retain" receives more votes, the incumbent is elected; if "not retain" wins, no one is elected and the vacancy is filled under existing rules for mid-term vacancies. This directly affects judicial candidates running unopposed in these courts, altering the election process from a standard vote count to a retention vote.
This bill requires county and city clerks to allow any member of the public to view a registered voter's signature in person at the clerk's office, but prohibits clerks from providing copies of signatures or permitting people to copy them. It directly affects registered voters (whose signatures become viewable under this rule) and county/city clerks (who must implement these access procedures). The bill modifies existing election law to clarify that signatures are accessible for inspection but not copyable, while maintaining existing protections for other voter information like addresses, phone numbers, and Social Security numbers. This is a procedural change to voter record access with no fiscal impact on local or state government.
SB 366 requires Nevada's Department of Health and Human Services to request federal approval for higher Medicaid reimbursement rates for mental health therapists, physical therapists, and other specific healthcare providers. It would increase payments by 3% for all covered services, with additional 3% increases for services provided in community settings (like homes or schools), in rural counties (population under 100,000), or in areas with healthcare provider shortages. The request must be submitted by October 1, 2025, and must align with federal reimbursement standards. This bill directly affects providers serving vulnerable populations in underserved areas, aiming to improve access to care through updated payment structures.
SB 123 prohibits Nevada county commissioners and city governing bodies from passing any local rent control ordinances. If enacted, this bill would directly affect cities and counties across Nevada by blocking them from implementing rent control measures for residential properties. The key mechanism is adding explicit language to Nevada law (NRS 244 and 268) stating that local governments "shall not enact any ordinance or measure that imposes rent control." This is a procedural bill that would prevent local governments from adopting rent control policies, though it remains in committee with no further action allowed as of April 2025.
SB 144 updates Nevada's financial disclosure requirements for public officials and candidates for office. It adds a new threshold requiring disclosure of business holdings valued at $5,000 or more, in addition to the existing requirement for holdings representing 1% or more of a business's stock or securities. This applies to the official, candidate, or their household members and covers business entities where they serve as owners, directors, or hold securities. The changes take effect July 1, 2025, expanding transparency around financial interests.
SB 29 requires Nevada's Department of Health and Human Services to develop a Medicaid reimbursement system through accountable care organizations (ACOs) - groups of healthcare providers working together to improve care quality, lower costs, and coordinate services for patients. It mandates biennial surveys of Medicaid providers to gather input on improving reimbursement processes and provider utilization. The bill also directs the Department to request federal approval for higher reimbursement rates for physicians and advanced practice nurses, increasing payments by at least 8% in rural counties (under 100,000 residents) or 11% elsewhere under value-based payment models. These changes directly affect Medicaid providers and aim to reshape how healthcare is delivered and paid for under the state's Medicaid program.
SB 111 prohibits selling, offering for sale, or purchasing child remains (the body or body parts of a deceased child under 18, or removed from a living child) in Nevada, except for hospitals, medical schools, or educational institutions using them for education, research, or similar purposes. Violating this prohibition would be a misdemeanor offense. The bill defines "child" as under 18 and "child remains" to include bodies or body parts in any decomposition stage. It becomes effective on July 1, 2025.
SB 270 requires contractors and subcontractors working on public projects (or projects partially funded by public money) to provide specific documents - like bids, contracts, and payroll records - to labor groups (such as Taft-Hartley trust funds or joint labor-management committees) within 10 days of a written request. Contractors must redact personal information from documents and face penalties of $100 per day for delays, though they aren’t penalized if documents are held by subcontractors. The bill also grants labor committee representatives "reasonable access" to public works sites during normal hours to monitor compliance with prevailing wage and apprenticeship rules, protecting them from liability for safety violations during inspections. This directly affects contractors on publicly funded construction projects and labor groups seeking transparency in wage compliance.
SB 204 modifies Nevada wage laws to apply to H-2A visa herders - temporary agricultural workers who perform livestock herding or production on the range under federal H-2A visas. It allows employers and these workers to create written agreements excluding meal, sleep, and personal time periods from wages, provided interruptions by work require paid compensation. The bill exempts employers from maintaining detailed daily hour records for herders, instead permitting the written agreement to establish total weekly hours. Violations are classified as misdemeanors, and the Labor Commissioner enforces these provisions.
SJR 6 proposes amending the Nevada Constitution to replace the Legislature's current role in redistricting with an Independent Redistricting Commission. The Commission, composed of seven members (four appointed by legislative leaders and three selected from non-partisan voters), would draw state Senate, Assembly, and congressional districts starting in 2031, following strict criteria like equal population, geographic contiguity, and avoiding racial or partisan discrimination. This change would directly affect Nevada voters and legislators by removing the Legislature from redistricting decisions and requiring voter approval for the constitutional amendment to take effect. The bill specifies that districts must reflect communities of interest, avoid dividing neighborhoods, and maintain political competitiveness where possible.
SB 103 revises Nevada's mail ballot rules to require that mail ballots must be postmarked by the last day of early voting (not the election day) and received by the time polls close on election day. It mandates county and city clerks to date-mark ballots without a USPS postmark, eliminates the previous rule that counted ballots with unclear postmarks received within three days after the election, and requires secure ballot drop boxes at all polling locations. This directly affects voters mailing ballots, election officials responsible for processing ballots, and individuals returning ballots for others. The changes apply to all county and city elections in Nevada, focusing on clearer deadlines and verification processes.
This bill provides legal immunity to healthcare providers who perform forensic medical examinations for sexual assault victims or strangulation forensic examinations in domestic violence cases. It protects providers from civil lawsuits for ordinary mistakes made during these exams, as long as their actions weren't grossly negligent. The immunity specifically applies to examinations covered under Nevada statutes NRS 217.300 (sexual assault exams) and NRS 217.405 (strangulation exams). This clarifies that providers won't face liability for standard care during these sensitive procedures.
