Issue · Labor & Employment

Labor & Employment

Every labor & employment bill, vote, and legislator stance in Montana, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2025 Regular Session
Top supporter
Pat Flowers
92% support rate
Top opponent
Caleb Hinkle
13% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving labor & employment in Montana

Legislators moving labor & employment in Montana
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Pat Flowers
Pat Flowers Senate · District 31
D
Strong +
92% 65
Sara Novak
Sara Novak Senate · District 36
D
Strong +
92% 65
Willis Curdy
Willis Curdy Senate · District 49
D
Strong +
92% 65
Dave Fern
Dave Fern Senate · District 2
D
Strong +
92% 61
Chris Pope
Chris Pope Senate · District 33
D
Strong +
91% 68
Caleb Hinkle
Caleb Hinkle House · District 68
R
Strong −
13% 53
Tom Millett
Tom Millett House · District 2
R
Strong −
17% 53
Kathy Love
Kathy Love House · District 85
R
Strong −
19% 54
Carl Glimm
Carl Glimm Senate · District 3
R
Oppose
21% 71
Jedediah Hinkle
Jedediah Hinkle House · District 67
R
Oppose
22% 51
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All labor & employment bills

died · Montana · Senate May 23, 2025

SB 94: Generally revise public sector unions law

SB 94 prohibits Montana public employers from using public funds or resources for labor organization activities, directly affecting public sector workers like teachers and school staff. It bans contributions of public money to unions or paid leave for union work, but allows unpaid time off for such activities and permits using accrued personal leave under specific conditions. The bill requires unions to cover costs for paid leave used in union activities through annual invoices to public employers and mandates reporting on time spent on union-related work. These changes aim to limit public funding for union operations while establishing clear administrative procedures.
died · Montana · Senate May 23, 2025

SB 345: Revise workers' compensation laws relating to evidentiary standards

SB 345 would change how medical evidence is evaluated in Montana workers' compensation cases. It removes automatic preference for treating physicians' opinions, requiring courts to weigh medical testimony based on the provider's qualifications, experience with the specific worker, and credibility. The bill also limits discovery about independent medical examiners (IMEs) to their training, exam volume, and payments from insurers, aiming to reduce bias concerns. These changes directly affect workers seeking compensation, insurers requesting medical evaluations, and medical providers involved in these cases. The bill was introduced in 2025 but died in committee before becoming law.
signed · Montana · House Apr 7, 2025

HB 197: Revising workers’ compensation laws relating to when the employee is released to return to work

HB 197 revises Montana's workers' compensation law to change when temporary disability payments end for injured workers. It directly affects employees receiving temporary total disability benefits who are cleared by a doctor to return to full work duties. The bill specifies that benefits must terminate on the exact date a worker is released for full duty - rather than continuing until medical treatment concludes (maximum medical improvement) - if the worker is cleared before or at that point. This change, effective immediately upon the governor's signature on April 7, 2025, streamlines benefit termination while requiring physician documentation of medical stability and job suitability before any benefit change.
signed · Montana · Senate Apr 4, 2025

SB 172: Revise resort tax eligibility and allow use for workforce housing

SB 172 allows Montana resort communities and areas (designated under state law with populations under 3,500 that rely heavily on tourism) to use an additional 1% resort tax - previously restricted to infrastructure - specifically for workforce housing. The bill amends tax code sections to explicitly permit this new allocation, alongside existing infrastructure uses, for communities that qualify under the defined criteria. It does not create new taxes but changes how existing resort tax revenue may be spent, directly affecting designated resort districts and communities. The policy shift aims to address housing needs for local workers in tourism-dependent areas.