Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice (Sentencing)

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in Montana, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2025 Regular Session
Top supporter
Pete Elverum
100% support rate
Top opponent
Barry Usher
25% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving sentencing in Montana

Legislators moving sentencing in Montana
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Pete Elverum
Pete Elverum House · District 82
D
Strong +
100% 12
Dave Fern
Dave Fern Senate · District 2
D
Strong +
80% 10
Mary Ann Dunwell
Mary Ann Dunwell Senate · District 42
D
Support
73% 11
Luke Muszkiewicz
Luke Muszkiewicz House · District 79
D
Support
71% 14
Andrea Olsen
Andrea Olsen Senate · District 48
D
Support
71% 17
Barry Usher
Barry Usher Senate · District 19
R
Oppose
25% 16
Becky Beard
Becky Beard Senate · District 38
R
Oppose
27% 11
Butch Gillespie
Butch Gillespie Senate · District 9
R
Oppose
27% 11
Greg Oblander
Greg Oblander House · District 38
R
Oppose
27% 11
Mike Yakawich
Mike Yakawich Senate · District 24
R
Oppose
27% 11
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All criminal justice bills

signed · Montana · Senate May 13, 2025

SB 19: Revise sentencing laws related to theft

SB 19 revises sentencing laws for several offenses, including theft, failure to return rented or leased personal property, issuing bad checks, deceptive practices, forgery, and identity theft. The bill directly affects individuals charged with these crimes by modifying the legal framework for their penalties. A key provision of the bill is raising the monetary thresholds that determine the severity of penalties for these offenses. It also revises the definition of "common scheme" within the state's legal code.
Sub-Topics Sentencing
died · Montana · House May 22, 2025

HB 691: Provide for legislative intent regarding the Montana criminal justice data warehouse

HB 691 clarifies the purpose and requirements for Montana's existing criminal justice data warehouse, which collects and stores information from state and local agencies. The bill specifies that the warehouse must include detailed offender data - such as complete criminal histories, sentencing timelines, drug involvement in offenses, and pretrial release outcomes - to help officials make data-driven decisions about the justice system. State agencies, courts, and other entities are required to contribute data to the warehouse while retaining ownership of their information, with strict confidentiality protections outlined. This bill directly affects law enforcement, courts, and correctional agencies by standardizing how they share and use criminal justice data.
Sub-Topics Sentencing
died · Montana · Senate May 23, 2025

SB 84: Generally revise laws related to presentence investigations

SB 84 revises Montana's rules for presentence investigations, which are reports courts use to inform sentencing decisions. It requires courts to order these investigations after guilty pleas or convictions for most felonies (unless a recent report exists), sets a 30-day deadline for reports, and adds specific requirements: mental health evaluations for defendants claiming mental impairment at the time of offense, and psychosexual evaluations for certain sex offense convictions. The bill directly affects courts, probation officers, and defendants, particularly those with mental health considerations or sex offense convictions. It clarifies when investigations are mandatory, streamlines reporting timelines, and ensures key evaluations are included in sentencing considerations.
signed · Montana · Senate May 8, 2025

SB 70: Generally revise laws related to supervision on probation

SB 70 revises laws related to conditions of probation and parole supervision. The bill allows a probation and parole officer to remove a condition of supervision without a formal court hearing if the sentencing court, probationer, or county attorney does not object. This change requires the Department of Corrections to notify victims when such a condition is removed. It streamlines the process for adjusting probation conditions, directly affecting individuals under supervision, probation officers, and victims.