Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice (Courts)

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in Montana, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
6
2025 Regular Session
Top supporter
Tom France
100% support rate
Top opponent
Shannon Maness
27% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving courts in Montana

Legislators moving courts in Montana
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Tom France
Tom France House · District 99
D
Strong +
100% 16
Gayle Lammers
Gayle Lammers Senate · District 21
R
Strong +
100% 14
Courtenay Sprunger
Courtenay Sprunger House · District 7
R
Strong +
93% 15
Jennifer Lynch
Jennifer Lynch House · District 73
D
Strong +
93% 15
Linda Reksten
Linda Reksten House · District 13
R
Strong +
93% 14
Shannon Maness
Shannon Maness House · District 70
R
Oppose
27% 15
Ed Byrne
Ed Byrne House · District 11
R
Oppose
29% 14
Kerri Seekins-Crowe
Kerri Seekins-Crowe House · District 39
R
Oppose
29% 14
Brandon Ler
Brandon Ler House · District 33
R
Oppose
31% 16
Braxton Mitchell
Braxton Mitchell House · District 5
R
Oppose
31% 16
Showing 6 of 6 bills

All criminal justice bills

died · Montana · Senate May 23, 2025

SB 370: Generally revise laws related to jury duty

SB 370 increases daily compensation for Montana jurors: $25-$60 per day for attending jury duty and an additional $25-$60 per day if selected for a specific case. It directly affects individuals summoned for jury service in criminal cases, providing higher pay than current rates. The bill establishes a funding mechanism where counties submit invoices to the Office of Court Administrator for reimbursement of these costs. This replaces the existing fee structure under Section 3-15-201, MCA, specifically for criminal trials or settlements requiring jury service.
Sub-Topics Courts
vetoed · Montana · Senate Jun 27, 2025

SB 40: Revise supreme court public records laws by opening deliberations and files to the public

SB 40 would require Montana's Supreme Court to publicly disclose its deliberations by mandating recordings of closed meetings and making those records available after a case is final. It amends Montana law (sections 2-3-203, 2-3-212, and 2-6-1002, MCA) to ensure closed judicial discussions - currently private - are recorded and accessible to the public once all appeals are exhausted. The bill directly affects the Montana Supreme Court's internal proceedings and expands public access to judicial decision-making. Key provisions include requiring electronic recordings of closed meetings, redacting only confidential information as defined by law, and specifying that cases become final after all review periods expire.
Sub-Topics Courts Judges
died · Montana · House May 22, 2025

HB 116: Provide for attorneys to appear remotely

HB 116 aimed to allow attorneys, particularly public defenders, to appear remotely in court proceedings. The bill would have required all courts to establish a consistent process for these remote appearances. Public defenders would have been permitted to appear remotely for "nonsubstantive hearings," such as arraignments or bond hearings, where the case's final outcome isn't decided. However, a court could still order an attorney to appear in person if there was "good cause," such as a lack of technological resources, and provided advance notice.
Sub-Topics Courts
signed · Montana · House May 19, 2025

HB 575: Generally revise the proceedings in which a public defender may be assigned

HB 575 revises the circumstances under which a public defender may be assigned in court proceedings. It specifically authorizes courts to assign a public defender to a parent facing involuntary termination of their parental rights. The bill also allows courts to order a public defender to serve as a member of a treatment court team. These changes expand the scope of public defender services to include these specific situations.
Sub-Topics Courts
died · Montana · House May 20, 2025

HB 437: Provide for dismissal of certain criminal charges against health care provider

HB 437 would have allowed health care providers in Montana to request the dismissal of criminal charges related to their professional conduct. If a provider filed such a motion, the state would be required to prove in court that the provider's actions were knowingly or purposely committed, not merely negligent, and that they were outside the accepted standards of care. If the state failed to meet this burden of proof, the court would dismiss the complaint, information, or indictment against the health care provider. The bill aimed to provide protections for health care providers.
Sub-Topics Courts
died · Montana · House May 22, 2025

HB 236: Provide for evaluations of defendants in detention centers or state prisons

HB 236 aimed to allow mental health evaluations for criminal defendants, used to determine their fitness to proceed in court, to be conducted within detention centers or state prisons. It directed the Department of Public Health and Human Services to create rules for these facilities, covering aspects like defendant care, security for evaluators, and the use of remote communication for examinations. The bill also outlined which entities, such as the courts or public defender's office, would be responsible for covering the costs of these evaluations and related expenses. This would have impacted criminal defendants undergoing such evaluations and the correctional facilities hosting them.
Sub-Topics Courts