SJR 115 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, modifies provisions relating to taxation. INCOME TAX This amendment provides that, if all revenue triggers established by the General Assembly for the elimination of the individual income tax are met such that the top rate of tax is reduced below 1.4%, then for any tax year beginning on or after the later of January 1, 2031, or January 1 of the year in which the top rate of tax is reduced below 1.4%, no individual income tax shall be imposed by the state, provided that this provision shall not apply to any earnings tax imposed by a political subdivision or to the income tax imposed on the income of trusts, estates, or fiduciaries thereof, corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies, or any other entity other than real persons. SALES AND USE TAX This amendment authorizes the General Assembly to expand the sales and use tax base to include the ability to tax any goods and services. Beginning January 1, 2029, any county, city, town, or village imposing a sales or use tax at a rate greater than 1%, and any other political subdivision imposing a sales and use tax at a rate greater than 0.5% shall annually adjust one or more of several tax levies imposed by such political subdivision for the purpose of offsetting any additional revenue received from the expansion of the sales and use tax base. The levies that shall be adjusted are the sales and use tax rate, personal property tax levy, residential real property tax levy, or earnings tax rate. Notwithstanding such provision, no adjustment made pursuant to this provision shall result in a reduction in funding to the public schools within or serving such political subdivision. Beginning January 1, 2029, each constitutionally-imposed sales and use tax rate shall be adjusted in a manner provided by law in order to produce substantially the same amount of revenue as the median annual revenue that such tax produced for the three fiscal years ending prior to the preceding calendar year, as adjusted for inflation. The State Auditor shall determine any such adjustments. Any tax or revenue increase resulting from any general law enacted by the General Assembly for the purpose of eliminating the individual income tax, provided that such general law is enacted within three years of the effective date of this amendment, shall be exempt from Hancock limitations and from constitutional provisions relating to motor fuel tax. The Director of Revenue may promulgate rules for the purpose of clarifying and prohibiting the circumvention of the expansion of the sales and use tax base, as well as to define any terms left undefined by general law. This amendment is substantially similar to SS/SCS/HCS/HJRs 173 & 174 (2026). JOSH NORBERG
HB 3405 modifies Missouri's tax treatment for partnerships and S corporations (referred to as "affected business entities"). It imposes a new tax on these entities doing business in Missouri, calculating the tax by adjusting their federal income (after state deductions) or applying a 20% deduction to ordinary business income for tax years starting in 2027. The tax applies to income sourced within Missouri, with losses allowed to be carried forward to future tax years. This directly affects Missouri-based partnerships and S corporations, particularly those with members holding interests through multiple tiers.
SB 1656 removes the state sales tax from eligible food items, meaning groceries and similar products purchased for home consumption will not be taxed at the standard rate. It specifically exempts food that qualifies for federal food stamps (like groceries), but excludes restaurants, fast food, and eateries where food sales make up over 80% of revenue. The bill defines "food" broadly to include vending machine sales but clarifies this exemption does not affect local sales taxes. This policy change directly affects grocery shoppers and retailers selling qualifying food items, while excluding dining establishments. The tax revenue previously collected on these items (at 1%) would no longer be collected under this exemption.
HB 3297 allows residential development in commercial or industrial zones if at least 40% of units are affordable for 30 years, prohibiting local governments from requiring zoning changes or special approvals for such projects. It mandates minimum density and height standards based on existing local rules and permits administrative approval without additional board review. The bill also creates property tax exemptions for qualifying affordable housing: full exemption for households earning ≤80% of median income, and 75% exemption for 80-120% of median income, applicable to new multifamily projects with over 70 units meeting income criteria. These tax benefits require annual applications with income verification and tenant restrictions, effective for tax year 2027.
HB 3538 establishes a "Motor Fuel Tax Fund of 2021" by setting tiered taxes on various fuels used in vehicles. It imposes rates like 17 cents per gallon for regular gasoline, 5-17 cents per gallon equivalent for natural gas/propane (increasing over time), and a supplemental tax rising from 2.5 cents to 12.5 cents per gallon starting in 2021. The revenue from these taxes flows into the fund, which must be used for state road and bridge projects. Businesses that qualify (e.g., commercial fleets using fuel for non-highway purposes) can claim refunds by submitting documentation annually, with refunds paid from the fund.
HB 3236 creates a sales tax exemption for building supplies used in constructing unattached single-family homes within participating counties or municipalities. It directly affects homebuilders and homeowners in jurisdictions that opt into the program, limiting the exemption to purchases under $250,000 per home. To qualify, a county or municipality must pass an ordinance to join the program, and homebuilders must obtain a department of revenue exemption letter confirming eligibility. The exemption applies only to construction of single-family homes, not attached dwellings, and runs from January 1, 2027, through 2031.
HB 3503 would replace the existing sales tax on food with a new "business enterprise tax" applied to for-profit businesses operating in the state. The tax would be calculated based on a business's "enterprise value tax base," which includes compensation paid, interest, and dividends. This new tax is designed to offset the revenue loss from removing the food sales tax, ensuring no net reduction in state tax revenue. The bill applies to most businesses (excluding certain nonprofits, insurance companies, and investment trusts) but does not affect individual consumers directly.
HB 3247 would expand the tax-exempt "food" category to include dietary supplements like vitamins and minerals, making them subject to the reduced one percent sales tax rate (currently applied to eligible grocery items) instead of standard rates. This directly affects supplement retailers and consumers purchasing these products, as they would no longer pay the higher tax rate on qualifying items. The bill specifies that restaurants and establishments where over 80% of revenue comes from prepared food (e.g., fast food, cafes) remain excluded from this tax treatment. The change is limited to supplements meeting federal definitions under 21 U.S.C. § 321(ff), not broader food items.
HJR 189 proposes creating Missouri's "Show-Me Prosperity Fund," a permanent endowment designed to eventually eliminate all state taxes. The fund would grow through investments, and only after the state treasurer confirms sufficient annual investment income covers current tax revenue could it fund tax eliminations. Strict rules prevent using the fund's principal, limit annual withdrawals to 2% of its 5-year average value, and require voter approval for tax changes. This would directly affect all Missouri residents by potentially replacing state income, sales, corporate, and other taxes once the fund meets specific growth targets.
HB 2734 is a proposed bill that would allow counties or cities to levy a property tax (up to 10 cents per $100 assessed value) for senior services, subject to voter approval via a ballot question. If approved, the tax revenue would fund a dedicated "Senior Citizens' Services Fund" managed by a locally appointed board of directors, which must use the money exclusively for programs improving health, nutrition, and quality of life for residents aged 60 and older. The bill requires the board to seek accreditation from a statewide nonprofit organization and pay an annual fee of 1% of fund revenue, while prohibiting fund use for political purposes. This proposal directly affects local governments, taxpayers, and seniors aged 60+ in communities adopting the tax.
