Issue · Immigration

Immigration

Every immigration bill, vote, and legislator stance in Michigan, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Betsy Coffia
100% support rate
Top opponent
Pat Outman
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving immigration in Michigan

Legislators moving immigration in Michigan
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Betsy Coffia
Betsy Coffia House · District 103
D
Strong +
100% 6
Brenda Carter
Brenda Carter House · District 53
D
Strong +
100% 6
Carol Glanville
Carol Glanville House · District 84
D
Strong +
100% 6
Carrie Rheingans
Carrie Rheingans House · District 47
D
Strong +
100% 6
Donavan McKinney
Donavan McKinney House · District 11
D
Strong +
100% 6
Pat Outman
Pat Outman House · District 91
R
Strong −
0% 7
Rick Outman
Rick Outman Senate · District 33
R
Strong −
0% 7
Alicia St. Germaine
Alicia St. Germaine House · District 62
R
Strong −
0% 6
Angela Rigas
Angela Rigas House · District 79
R
Strong −
0% 6
Ann Bollin
Ann Bollin House · District 49
R
Strong −
0% 6
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All immigration bills

passed both · Michigan · House Jun 10, 2025

HB 4464: Insurance: health insurers; compliance with affordable care act coverage; modify. Amends secs. 3403, 3406z, 3406bb, 3406hh & 3406ii of 1956 PA 218 (MCL 500.3403 et seq.).

HB 4464 requires Michigan health insurers to provide dependent coverage until age 26 without discrimination based on a child's birth status, tax filing, or residence. It mandates coverage for newborns from birth (including congenital defects) and prohibits lifetime or annual dollar limits on essential health benefits like emergency care, hospitalization, and maternity services. The bill also requires insurers to cover specific preventive services - such as evidence-based screenings and immunizations recommended by federal guidelines - without cost-sharing for eligible patients. These requirements apply to most individual and small group health insurance plans in Michigan, excluding grandfathered plans, retiree coverage, and short-term policies.
passed both · Michigan · House May 6, 2025

HB 4342: Revenue sharing: cities and villages; withholding of payments for enactment and enforcement of certain sanctuary policies; provide for. Amends sec. 21 of 1971 PA 140 (MCL 141.921). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4338'25, HB 4339'25

House Bill 4342 amends Michigan's state revenue sharing act, introducing a new condition for withholding state funds from local governments. Beginning October 1, 2025, the state treasurer would withhold all revenue sharing payments from any city, village, township, or county. This would occur if the local government enacts or enforces a law, ordinance, policy, or rule that violates the "local government sanctuary policy prohibition act" or the "county law enforcement protection act." Payments would be withheld for as long as the violating policy remains in effect. This bill is tied to the enactment of House Bills 4338 and 4339.
passed both · Michigan · House May 6, 2025

HB 4338: Local government: other; sanctuary policy prohibition act; create. Creates new act.

HB 4338, the "Local Government Sanctuary Policy Prohibition Act," prohibits Michigan cities, townships, and their agencies from creating or enforcing policies that prevent local officials from sharing immigration status information with federal authorities. It requires local governments to comply with the law within 60 days and allows residents or the state attorney general to sue if a local policy violates it. If a court finds a violation, it can order the policy repealed, issue an injunction against enforcement, and award damages and attorney fees to the winning party. The law directly affects all local government entities and their employees who interact with federal immigration officials.
passed both · Michigan · House May 6, 2025

HB 4339: Counties: ordinances; county law enforcement protection act; create. Creates new act.

HB 4339, the "County Law Enforcement Protection Act," prohibits counties from enacting or enforcing any local law, ordinance, policy, or rule that restricts peace officers or local officials from communicating with federal authorities about an individual’s immigration status in Michigan. It directly affects county governments, local law enforcement, and residents by requiring counties to eliminate existing restrictive policies within 60 days and preventing new violations. The bill establishes legal remedies, allowing residents or the attorney general to sue counties that violate it, with courts able to order policy changes, issue injunctions, and award damages or attorney fees. It does not alter immigration enforcement but ensures local officials can cooperate with federal immigration authorities without county restrictions.