Issue · Environment

Environment

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in Michigan, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Winnie Brinks
94% support rate
Top opponent
Jonathan Lindsey
6% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving environment in Michigan

Legislators moving environment in Michigan
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Winnie Brinks
Winnie Brinks Senate · District 29
D
Strong +
94% 29
Paul Wojno
Paul Wojno Senate · District 10
D
Strong +
94% 29
Sean McCann
Sean McCann Senate · District 19
D
Strong +
94% 29
Sylvia Santana
Sylvia Santana Senate · District 2
D
Strong +
94% 29
Mary Cavanagh
Mary Cavanagh Senate · District 6
D
Strong +
94% 29
Jonathan Lindsey
Jonathan Lindsey Senate · District 17
R
Strong −
6% 28
Jim Runestad
Jim Runestad Senate · District 23
R
Strong −
17% 23
Lana Theis
Lana Theis Senate · District 22
R
Strong −
17% 29
Ed McBroom
Ed McBroom Senate · District 38
R
Strong −
20% 26
Thomas Albert
Thomas Albert Senate · District 18
R
Oppose
22% 29
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All environment bills

signed · Michigan · Senate Dec 23, 2025

SB 689: Land use: farmland and open space; relinquishment of farmland from development rights agreements; expand legal arrangements triggering. Amends sec. 36111 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.36111). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0688'25, SB 0690'25, SB 0686'25, SB 0687'25, SB 0685'25

SB 689 amends Michigan's farmland preservation law to expand when landowners can give up (relinquish) farmland from development rights agreements. It adds two new scenarios: 1) land with pre-existing structures (up to 5 acres), and 2) land for a farm operator's residence (up to 2 acres), both requiring approval from local government and the state land use agency. If relinquishment occurs, landowners must repay tax credits received under the agreement, plus interest, via a lien recorded against the property. This directly affects farmers with existing farmland preservation agreements who wish to develop or use portions of their land for specific purposes.
signed · Michigan · Senate Oct 8, 2025

SB 273: Agriculture: other; water quality protection fee; extend sunset. Amends sec. 8715 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.8715) & repeals (See bill).

SB 273 extends the expiration date of a fee imposed on agricultural operations to fund water quality protection programs. This bill amends Michigan's 1994 law (MCL 324.8715) to remove the sunset provision, ensuring the fee remains in effect indefinitely. It directly affects agricultural businesses that pay this fee, which supports local water quality initiatives. The bill was enacted with immediate effect after governor approval on October 7, 2025.
passed · Michigan · Senate Sep 4, 2025

SB 396: Environmental protection: air pollution; regulation of carbon sequestration; provide for. Amends secs. 502 & 1301 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.502 & 324.1301); adds sec. 52509 & subch. 6 to ch. 3 of art. III. TIE BAR WITH: SB 0394'25, SB 0395'25

SB 396 updates Michigan's air pollution laws to include specific regulations for carbon sequestration projects. It directly affects companies and organizations that capture and store carbon dioxide underground to reduce emissions. The bill adds new rules requiring safe storage practices, reporting, and oversight for these projects under the existing air pollution control framework. This amends current law to create a clear regulatory path for carbon sequestration as part of the state's air quality management.
passed · Michigan · Senate Sep 4, 2025

SB 394: Natural resources: gas and oil; ownership and conveyance rights associated with pore space; establish. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: SB 395'25

SB 394 establishes that landowners in Michigan automatically own the pore space (open spaces in underground rock formations) beneath their property, which can be used for storing substances like carbon dioxide. This means property buyers inherit pore space rights unless the seller explicitly transfers or excludes them in the sale agreement. The bill requires clear language in property transfers to sever pore space rights from surface ownership, protecting existing mineral rights and surface access for oil/gas operations. It does not affect mineral rights or existing agreements but requires Senate Bill 395 to pass simultaneously for full implementation. The bill aims to clarify ownership for future resource storage projects while maintaining current legal frameworks.