Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in Michigan, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
14
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Erika Geiss
77% support rate
Top opponent
Rick Outman
23% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving criminal justice in Michigan

Legislators moving criminal justice in Michigan
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Erika Geiss
Erika Geiss Senate · District 1
D
Support
77% 13
Dayna Polehanki
Dayna Polehanki Senate · District 5
D
Support
73% 15
Jeff Irwin
Jeff Irwin Senate · District 15
D
Support
73% 15
Jeremy Moss
Jeremy Moss Senate · District 7
D
Support
73% 15
John Cherry
John Cherry Senate · District 27
D
Support
73% 15
Rick Outman
Rick Outman Senate · District 33
R
Oppose
23% 13
Jonathan Lindsey
Jonathan Lindsey Senate · District 17
R
Oppose
27% 15
Lana Theis
Lana Theis Senate · District 22
R
Oppose
27% 15
Michele Hoitenga
Michele Hoitenga Senate · District 36
R
Oppose
27% 15
Thomas Albert
Thomas Albert Senate · District 18
R
Oppose
27% 15
Showing 11–14 of 14 bills

All criminal justice bills

passed · Michigan · Senate May 20, 2025

SB 260: Torts: governmental immunity; governmental agency and employee liability for criminal sexual conduct; allow. Amends sec. 7 of 1964 PA 170 (MCL 691.1407) & adds sec. 7d. TIE BAR WITH: SB 257'25

Senate Bill 260 amends Michigan's governmental immunity act, specifically for public universities, colleges, and school districts. It removes their immunity from tort liability in cases of criminal sexual conduct committed by their employees or agents. These institutions can be held liable if they were negligent in hiring, supervision, or training, or if they had knowledge of the conduct and failed to report it to law enforcement. However, liability is only imposed if the institution also had prior knowledge of the individual's propensity for or previous acts of criminal sexual conduct and failed to intervene to prevent the subsequent conduct.
passed · Michigan · Senate May 14, 2025

SB 169: Appropriations: department of corrections; appropriations for fiscal year 2025-2026; provide for. Creates appropriation act.

This bill allocates $2.25 billion in state funding for Michigan's Department of Corrections for fiscal year 2025-2026. It covers administrative costs (including staff salaries and pensions), inmate reentry programs (like education and job training), parole services, and facility operations (including body-worn cameras and housing). The funding directly supports 13,207 correctional staff positions and services for inmates, such as vocational programs and transitional housing. It does not create new programs but provides budgetary support for existing department functions.
passed · Michigan · Senate May 13, 2025

SB 170: Appropriations: judiciary; appropriations for fiscal year 2025-2026; provide for. Creates appropriation act.

SB 170 is a budget bill that allocates $393.39 million in state funds to support Michigan's judiciary for fiscal year 2025-2026. It directly funds court operations, including the Supreme Court ($102.8 million), Court of Appeals ($27.7 million), and judicial salaries for approximately 591 judges across all courts. Key provisions include funding for court administration, problem-solving courts, technology systems, and specialized programs like foster care review and drug treatment courts. The bill specifies exact amounts for each judicial branch and program without changing existing laws or creating new policies. This is a routine funding measure for the state's court system, not a substantive policy change.
passed · Michigan · Senate Mar 5, 2025

SB 24: Juveniles: juvenile justice services; certain information sharing for research purposes in juvenile justice cases; allow. Amends sec. 9 of 1988 PA 13 (MCL 722.829).

SB 24 amends Michigan's Juvenile Diversion Act to allow researchers to access certain juvenile justice records for research purposes, while strictly protecting minors' privacy. It requires researchers to obtain a data use agreement with the state court administrative office, which must include safeguards against public disclosure of personally identifiable information like names, addresses, and Social Security numbers. The bill prohibits using these records for any purpose other than research, with violations punishable by fines or up to 180 days in jail. This directly affects researchers, courts, and the state court administrative office, ensuring research access does not compromise minor confidentiality or interfere with diversion decisions.
Showing 11 to 14 of 14 bills