This bill (HD 2903) requires health insurance plans to cover epinephrine autoinjectors for anaphylaxis treatment with specific cost limits. It mandates that coverage for one brand-name or generic epinephrine autoinjector (sold as a two-pack) cannot include deductibles or co-insurance, and co-payments must not exceed $60. The law directly affects individuals with severe allergies requiring emergency epinephrine treatment, ensuring predictable out-of-pocket costs for this critical medication. It amends multiple sections of health insurance law to explicitly include anaphylaxis as a covered condition and set the $60 co-pay cap.
This bill regulates pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to improve transparency and fairness in drug pricing. It requires PBMs to: (1) pay pharmacies promptly for "clean claims" (complete, error-free claims) without retroactively reducing payments; (2) cap patient cost-sharing (copays, deductibles) at the pharmacy’s contracted price; and (3) maintain transparent, frequently updated maximum allowable cost lists for generic drugs, allowing pharmacies to challenge unfair pricing. The bill directly affects PBMs, community pharmacies (excluding mail-order from network calculations), and patients who pay for prescriptions. Key provisions aim to prevent unexpected payment cuts and ensure fair reimbursement based on actual drug costs.
By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by resolve, Senate, No. 858) of Lydia Edwards that provisions to assess the supply, distribution and capacity of pharmacy and pharmacological services. Health Care Financing.
By Representative Barber of Somerville, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1092) of Christine P. Barber and others relative to prescription medications. Financial Services.
HD 1119 prohibits pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) from discriminating against hospitals and patients participating in the federal 340B drug discount program. The bill specifically bans PBMs from reimbursing 340B hospitals at lower rates than non-340B hospitals, charging extra fees for 340B participation, restricting network access based on 340B status, or requiring special identification for 340B drugs (except for Medicaid claims). It also prevents PBMs from steering patients away from 340B providers or imposing higher costs like extra copays for drugs obtained through these hospitals. This state-level bill directly affects 340B-covered hospitals (including community health centers and safety-net providers) and their patients by ensuring equitable access to discounted medications.
HD 2249 establishes a commission to study how health insurers use "preferred pharmacy networks" to steer patients toward lower-cost pharmacies where insurers negotiate better drug prices. The commission, composed of legislative leaders, health officials, and policy experts, will analyze the feasibility and cost-benefit of implementing such networks and estimate potential prescription drug savings. It must submit a report with recommendations and draft legislation to relevant committees within 12 months of the bill's passage. This bill does not change current law but creates a formal process to evaluate a specific cost-saving approach used by insurers. The direct effect is on insurers, pharmacies, and the state's health policy decision-makers.
By Representative Garry of Dracut, a petition (subject to Joint Rule 12) of Colleen M. Garry relative to the rights of pharmacists to participate as preferred health care providers. Financial Services.
This bill protects 340B contract pharmacies by prohibiting drug manufacturers or distributors from restricting access to discounted 340B drugs or demanding unnecessary data sharing as a condition for sale. It directly affects 340B entities (like community health centers and hospitals) that contract with pharmacies to provide discounted medications to eligible patients. The law bans manufacturers from denying, restricting, or prohibiting 340B drug delivery to authorized pharmacy locations unless federal law prohibits it, and prevents requiring extra claims or utilization data beyond federal requirements. Violations are treated as consumer protection law breaches under Massachusetts law, with each restricted drug package counted as a separate violation.
H 4346 requires pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) and insurers to follow specific rules for setting maximum allowable costs (MACs) for prescription drugs. Drugs must have available therapeutic equivalents to be listed on MACs, and PBMs must remove them if they no longer meet criteria within 3 business days. The bill mandates transparency by requiring PBMs to share MAC sources, costs, and lists with pharmacies, and creates an appeal process for pharmacies to challenge low MACs, with retroactive payment adjustments if appeals succeed. It also prohibits retroactive discounts and requires MassHealth to reimburse pharmacies at the rate specified in the state’s pharmacy provider manual.
This bill (SD 761) requires pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to maintain fair and accessible pharmacy networks for patients, directly affecting PBMs, health insurers, and community pharmacies. It prohibits "steering" (directing prescriptions to owned/affiliated pharmacies) and mandates that PBMs provide networks with convenient access to physical pharmacies near patients' homes, excluding mail-order options from adequacy calculations. Violating these rules triggers a 10% surcharge on the PBM's prior year's pharmacy reimbursements, payable to the state division. The law aims to prevent anti-competitive practices that limit patient choice and access to local pharmacies.