SD 1020 (An Act promoting fairness in parole) revises parole violation procedures in Massachusetts. It allows parole officers to issue temporary custody warrants for specific violations (like removing GPS trackers or contacting victims) with supervisor approval, and requires a parole board member’s review for other alleged violations. Parolees placed in temporary custody must have a preliminary hearing within 15 days to determine if the violation occurred, considering factors like the violation’s severity and public safety. The bill directly affects parolees facing revocation, parole officers, and the parole board by standardizing warrant processes and requiring timely hearings. It aims to create clearer, more consistent procedures for handling parole violations.
SD 1033 makes it a crime for individuals under court order to tamper with GPS tracking devices required as a condition of probation or pre-trial release. The bill prohibits intentionally damaging, removing, modifying, or deactivating such devices, or attempting to do so. Violators face penalties of up to five years in prison or two and a half years in a House of Correction. This directly affects people on probation or pre-trial release who are mandated to wear GPS monitors.
SD 1050 establishes a special commission to study Massachusetts' response to domestic violence and sexual assault victims, including analyzing current resources and probation systems. It creates specialized domestic violence probation units in courts, requiring each unit to include a dedicated victim advocate from a non-profit organization to serve as a liaison between survivors and probation officers. The bill mandates specialized training for probation officers handling these cases, requires them to monitor batterer's treatment program compliance, and updates procedures for reviewing protection orders to consider substance use recovery. These changes directly affect survivors of domestic violence, probation officers, and court staff handling these cases. The commission must report findings and recommendations by December 2026.
This bill raises the age limit for certain juvenile court proceedings from 18 to 19 years old. It specifically affects juveniles aged 16-19 convicted of first or second-degree murder under Chapter 265, requiring courts to consider their maturity and rehabilitation for parole eligibility after serving minimum sentences (15 years for second-degree murder). The bill mandates separate housing in youthful offender units for under-18 inmates, prohibits limiting access to rehabilitation programs (like education or vocational training), and establishes new procedures for evaluating a juvenile's legal competence to stand trial. These changes apply to all murder cases involving juveniles under 19.
This bill amends Massachusetts medical parole procedures to clarify eligibility and streamline the process. It redefines "permanent incapacitation" as irreversible physical/cognitive impairment and "terminal illness" as a condition likely causing death within 18 months. The bill requires correctional facilities to assess prisoners aged 55+ annually for cognitive decline, mandates medical documentation and violence risk assessments for parole petitions, and prioritizes community placement in a prisoner's home unless public safety risks exist. It directly affects incarcerated individuals with serious medical conditions who may qualify for release under these updated criteria.
This bill (HD 3242) changes Massachusetts parole board requirements to address racial disparities identified in the parole process. It mandates that at least 3 board members have specific professional experience (like mental health or substance use treatment), one must be a licensed mental health professional, and at least one member must have personal experience with incarceration and successfully completing parole. The bill requires the parole board to collect detailed demographic data on parole violations, revocations, and processing times by race, ethnicity, and gender, and to publish this annually. It also requires individualized parole conditions based on current research, detailed written decisions for all cases, and public hearings 90 days before parole eligibility dates. These changes directly affect the parole board, incarcerated individuals, and the Department of Correction.
By Mr. Eldridge, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1087) of James B. Eldridge, Brandy Fluker-Reid, Christopher J. Worrell, Joanne M. Comerford and others for legislation to abolish sentences of life without parole for individuals who committed crimes while they were considered minors or young adults. The Judiciary.
By Mr. Velis, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1781) of John C. Velis for legislation relative to paper warrants and persons on probation. Public Safety and Homeland Security.
By Ms. Jehlen, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1707) of Patricia D. Jehlen for legislation to remove barriers to medical parole. Public Safety and Homeland Security.
By Representative Holmes of Boston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2638) of Russell E. Holmes relative to parole board employees. Public Safety and Homeland Security.