This bill modifies Massachusetts sentencing laws to increase parole eligibility for certain life-sentence prisoners. It requires that individuals serving multiple life sentences for separate crimes become eligible for parole after 25 years, removes automatic parole exclusions for some life-sentence prisoners, and sets minimum terms for first-degree murder convictions (25 years for adults, 15-20 years for those aged 14-18). The bill also establishes a voluntary Restorative Justice program in prisons for those serving over 25 years, allowing structured dialogue between offenders, victims, and communities to address harm. These changes directly affect prisoners serving life sentences under specific circumstances, particularly those convicted of murder or multiple offenses.
This bill establishes mandatory post-release supervision for most individuals released from prison in Massachusetts. It requires a period equal to 25% of their maximum prison sentence (minimum nine months) for those sentenced to incarceration, excluding people on probation, parole, or lifetime community parole. Supervision is managed by the probation office for short sentences (under one year) or the parole board for longer sentences, with early termination possible after nine months under specific conditions like stable housing and employment. Violations can lead to increased supervision, short jail terms, or extended supervision periods, but do not automatically trigger new criminal charges.
SD 1020 (An Act promoting fairness in parole) revises parole violation procedures in Massachusetts. It allows parole officers to issue temporary custody warrants for specific violations (like removing GPS trackers or contacting victims) with supervisor approval, and requires a parole board member’s review for other alleged violations. Parolees placed in temporary custody must have a preliminary hearing within 15 days to determine if the violation occurred, considering factors like the violation’s severity and public safety. The bill directly affects parolees facing revocation, parole officers, and the parole board by standardizing warrant processes and requiring timely hearings. It aims to create clearer, more consistent procedures for handling parole violations.
S 1128 implements specific recommendations from a commission that studied racial disparities in the parole process. The bill directly affects individuals navigating parole decisions within the state's criminal justice system. Key provisions require state parole boards to adopt new procedures and data collection methods to address identified racial biases. These changes aim to create a more equitable parole process by mandating transparency and accountability measures based on the commission's findings.
This bill establishes a presumption of parole for eligible prisoners, requiring parole boards to grant parole at first eligibility unless they provide clear evidence the individual would reoffend. Parole boards must use structured risk assessments considering participation in rehabilitation programs, good behavior, and community reintegration plans. It mandates special consideration for disabled prisoners, including medical evaluations and reasonable accommodations to support successful parole. Additionally, the bill requires health departments to secure appropriate placements within 60 days for parolees needing specialized care, preventing incarceration due to housing issues.
HD 3412 requires judges to consider specific factors when deciding whether to place a defendant on probation. The bill mandates that judges evaluate items such as a defendant's age, military service history, education, medical conditions, family support systems, employment status, and details about the current crime (including victim injuries if violent). It directly affects judges making probation decisions and the defendants facing those decisions. The key provision expands the factors judges must weigh beyond typical considerations, ensuring a more comprehensive review of individual circumstances before granting probation. This change aims to create a more individualized approach to probation eligibility.
By Mr. Lewis, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1162) of Jason M. Lewis for legislation relative to judicial discretion for probation. The Judiciary.
This bill establishes a new Office of Community Justice Programs within the Commissioner of Probation to oversee community-based alternatives to incarceration. It defines three key program types: "Intensive Supervision with Treatment" (for moderate/high-risk offenders), pretrial services, and reentry programs, all operated by state, local, or private agencies. The bill requires agencies to submit detailed "community justice plans" outlining program content, costs, and evidence-based practices for state funding approval. It prohibits using Intensive Supervision with Treatment as a replacement for mandatory prison sentences and clarifies that probation departments may use these programs for eligible defendants under specific conditions. The law directly affects courts, probation departments, community service providers, and individuals in the criminal justice system facing sentencing, pretrial release, or reentry.
