Ashley Hinson Arenholz
Republican candidate · 2026 general election · Iowa
Ashley Hinson Arenholz
Republican
Races
- U.S. U.S. Senate District at-large · challenger
Campaign finance
FEC data through Jun 30, 2026. Covering the 2026 two-year cycle only.
Possibly out of date. last refreshed 2026-08-20
The 2026 cycle at a glance
Where the money came from
These categories divide total receipts of $10,217,845 exactly once, so they add back up to the reported total.
| Source | Amount | Share of receipts |
|---|---|---|
| Individual contributions | $5,267,629 | 51.6% |
| PAC and other committee contributions | $2,170,367 | 21.2% |
| Party committee contributions | $62,000 | 0.6% |
| Candidate self-funding | $0 | 0.0% |
| Loans | $0 | 0.0% |
| Other receipts, including transfers | $2,717,850 | 26.6% |
| Total receipts | $10,217,845 | 100% |
Financial position
Cash, debt, refunds, loans, and transfers as reported through Jun 30, 2026 for the 2026 cycle. These are factual reported values, not a judgement about whether a campaign is healthy, viable, or strong. Independent expenditures are never added to or subtracted from any of them: that money was never the campaign's.
| Measure | Amount |
|---|---|
| Cash on hand at coverage end | $6,749,491 |
| Debts and obligations owed by the committee | $0 |
| Debts and obligations owed to the committee | Not reported |
| Contributions refunded to individuals | $19,505 |
| Contributions refunded to committees | $3,000 |
| Transfers received from other authorized committeesAlready raised money moving between the candidate's own committees, not new fundraising. | $2,714,376 |
| Transfers made to other authorized committees | $24,438 |
| Repayments of candidate loans | $0 |
| Repayments of other loans | $0 |
Calculated from the reported values
Each row below is arithmetic MyRepTracker performed on the values above. Where the FEC published the figure itself, the row says so and no calculation was made.
| Measure | Amount | How it was produced |
|---|---|---|
| Contributions net of refunds | $7,477,490 | Calculated as individual + committee + party + candidate contributions, minus contributions refunded to individuals and committees. |
| Operating expenditures net of offsets | Not reported | An input this calculation needs is not published by the source behind this record. |
| Outstanding candidate loans | $0 | Calculated as loans received from the candidate minus repayments of those loans. |
| Other outstanding loans | $0 | Calculated as other loans received minus repayments of those loans. |
| Total contributions refunded | $22,505 | Calculated as refunds to individuals plus refunds to committees. |
Change since the previous filing
Both columns come from committee C00706267, so the two periods are comparable. A change is the difference between what 12P 2026 reported and what Q2 2026 reported, and the direction is stated in words rather than shown only as a sign. 12P 2026 reported through May 13, 2026 and Q2 2026 through Jun 30, 2026.
| Measure | 12P 2026Reported through May 13, 2026 | Q2 2026Reported through Jun 30, 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash on hand at period end | $5,990,014 | $6,749,491 | Up $759,477 |
| Debts owed by the committee | $0 | $0 | No change |
| Contribution refunds in the period | $1,500 | $8,500 | Up $7,000 |
Cash compared with one period's spending
Cash on hand of $6,749,491 set beside the $1,300,351 this campaign spent during Q2 2026, through Jun 30, 2026, which is 5.2 times that period's spending. This is a ratio between two reported numbers over one named period. It is not a forecast of how long the money will last, and campaigns do not spend evenly across a cycle.
Outside spending
Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with the campaign. This money was never received or controlled by Ashley Hinson Arenholz. Supporting and opposing spending are kept apart rather than combined into one number, and neither is added to campaign receipts.
Spent supporting
Spent opposing
What the money was spent on
Political committees that contributed directly
Money received by the authorized campaign committee from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.
This total will usually differ from the PAC figure in the summary above. The summary is what the campaign reported receiving in total; this ranking adds up the individual contributions that were itemized, which is a different record made at a different time. Neither is a correction of the other, and the gap is not an error in either one.
Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Aug 16, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.
| Rank | Committee | Amount | Share | Transactions | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NRSC C00027466 | $62,000 | 4.4% | 1 | Sep 25, 2025 |
| 2 | REPUBLICAN JEWISH COALITION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (RJC-PAC) C00345132 | $17,000 | 1.2% | 3 | Jun 1, 2026 |
| 3 | NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL PORK PAC C00201871 | $15,000 | 1.1% | 5 | Jun 16, 2026 |
| 4 | NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CONVENIENCE STORES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00126763 | $12,500 | 0.9% | 4 | May 21, 2026 |
| 5 | NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NABPAC) C00009985 | $11,000 | 0.8% | 4 | Mar 25, 2026 |
| 6 | UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. PAC (UPSPAC) C00064766 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | May 15, 2026 |
| 7 | NEXTERA ENERGY, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00064774 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Dec 16, 2025 |
| 8 | EMPLOYEES OF RTX CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00097568 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | May 13, 2026 |
| 9 | AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00110338 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Feb 25, 2026 |
| 10 | ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATION EMPLOYEE'S POLITICAL ACTION COMM C00132092 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Mar 25, 2026 |
| 11 | CATERPILLAR INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (CATPAC) C00148031 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Jun 4, 2026 |
| 12 | ERNST & YOUNG POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00227744 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | May 29, 2026 |
| 13 | KOCH, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (KOCHPAC) C00236489 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 4 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| 14 | REPUBLICAN MAJORITY FUND C00296640 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Apr 24, 2026 |
| 15 | VALUE IN ELECTING WOMEN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00327189 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Sep 23, 2025 |
| 16 | THE LINCOLN CLUB OF ORANGE COUNTY FEDERAL PAC C00328401 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Mar 25, 2026 |
| 17 | DAVITA INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (DAPAC) C00340943 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Mar 19, 2026 |
| 18 | POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS--PAC OF AAOS C00343137 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 4 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| 19 | AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION PAC C00343459 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Sep 27, 2025 |
| 20 | RESPONSIBILITY AND FREEDOM WORK PAC (RFWPAC) C00368696 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Dec 17, 2025 |
| 21 | NEW MAJORITY FEDERAL PAC C00387274 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Feb 17, 2026 |
| 22 | FREEDOM FUND C00390674 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Apr 29, 2026 |
| 23 | DIRIGO PAC C00391797 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Nov 7, 2025 |
| 24 | HEARTLAND VALUES PAC C00409003 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Sep 24, 2025 |
| 25 | ARKANSAS FOR LEADERSHIP POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ARKPAC) C00413948 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Sep 5, 2025 |
| 26 | MAJORITY COMMITTEE PAC--MC PAC C00428052 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Sep 2, 2025 |
| 27 | COMMON VALUES PAC C00442368 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Sep 10, 2025 |
| 28 | POET PAC C00450692 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Mar 25, 2026 |
| 29 | LEADERSHIP AND ACCOUNTABILITY ARE NATIONAL KEYS PAC C00492058 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Oct 23, 2025 |
| 30 | DAKOTA PAC C00493072 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Jun 5, 2026 |
| 31 | TOMORROW IS MEANINGFUL PAC C00495887 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Sep 26, 2025 |
| 32 | JOBS, FREEDOM, AND SECURITY PAC C00536540 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Sep 9, 2025 |
| 33 | INNOVATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00540187 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Sep 26, 2025 |
| 34 | BIG SKY OPPORTUNITY PAC C00542027 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Mar 31, 2026 |
| 35 | BOOTS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00567545 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Sep 3, 2025 |
| 36 | TRUE NORTH PAC C00571000 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Dec 16, 2025 |
| 37 | IN THE ARENA PAC C00623512 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Jun 10, 2026 |
| 38 | TENACIOUS PAC C00635367 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Mar 26, 2026 |
| 39 | TEAM AMERICA - BRINGING AMERICA TOGETHER PAC C00647354 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Mar 26, 2026 |
| 40 | CONSERVATIVES HARVESTING SUCCESS PAC C00678813 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | May 18, 2026 |
| 41 | LETS GET TO WORK PAC C00692327 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| 42 | SENATE EAGLE PAC C00719971 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | May 22, 2026 |
| 43 | FIGHT ON PAC C00762328 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Sep 9, 2025 |
| 44 | PAC FOR AMERICA C00772434 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| 45 | WONDER WOMEN PAC C00787002 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | May 15, 2026 |
| 46 | 1890 PAC C00799809 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Mar 13, 2026 |
| 47 | MARQUIS MASTER SC, INC. PAC (MARQUIS PAC) C00816728 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 4 | Feb 17, 2026 |
| 48 | FIGHTIN' RIGHT Y'ALL C00820209 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Jun 24, 2026 |
| 49 | ALABAMA FIRST PAC C00821058 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Sep 3, 2025 |
| 50 | BUILDING A NATIONAL KNOWLEDGEABLE SECURITY PAC C00832469 | $10,000 | 0.7% | 2 | Feb 23, 2026 |
Organizations spending independently
Supporting Ashley Hinson Arenholz
Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Aug 16, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.
| Rank | Committee | Amount | Share | Transactions | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Americans for Prosperity Action, Inc. (AFP Action) DBA CVA Action and DBA LIBRE Action C00687103 | $2,965,090 | 99.6% | 20 | Aug 4, 2026 |
| 2 | MISSION IOWA C00874370 | $10,677 | 0.4% | 1 | Jan 29, 2026 |
Opposing Ashley Hinson Arenholz
Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Aug 16, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.
| Rank | Committee | Amount | Share | Transactions | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AB PAC C00492140 | $2,043,033 | 100.0% | 19 | Aug 12, 2026 |
What that outside spending purchased
Each independent expenditure carries a short description the spending committee wrote, and these categories are those descriptions sorted under taxonomy outside-1.0. Spending supporting Ashley Hinson Arenholz and spending opposing them are broken down separately and never combined, and every share below is a share of that one direction's total.
The largest category is usually "Advertising, medium not specified". That is not a leftover: it is spending the committee described only as a media buy or as advertising, without saying whether it aired on television, ran online, or arrived in the mail. MyRepTracker reports what was filed rather than assigning it a medium.
Supporting Ashley Hinson Arenholz
| Purpose | Amount | % Share | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advertising, medium not specified Reported as a media buy or as advertising, with no medium named. | $2,442,214 | 82.1% | 16 |
| Direct mail | $533,553 | 17.9% | 5 |
| Classified | $2,975,767 | 100.0% | |
| Unclassified filing descriptions | $0 | 0.0% | |
| Total independent spending | $2,975,767 | 100% | 21 |
Opposing Ashley Hinson Arenholz
| Purpose | Amount | % Share | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital and online advertising | $1,439,750 | 70.5% | 6 |
| Direct mail | $439,488 | 21.5% | 4 |
| Broadcast, cable, and radio advertising | $99,960 | 4.9% | 4 |
| Advertising, medium not specified Reported as a media buy or as advertising, with no medium named. | $63,835 | 3.1% | 5 |
| Classified | $2,043,033 | 100.0% | |
| Unclassified filing descriptions | $0 | 0.0% | |
| Total independent spending | $2,043,033 | 100% | 19 |
Who the committees behind this money were
Every committee here is placed by the registration it filed with the FEC for the 2026 cycle: its designation, its committee type, and the organizational form it reported. That is the FEC's own record and involves no judgement by MyRepTracker, so this covers every itemized dollar. A committee's registration can change between cycles, and each cycle is judged by its own.
Contributed to Ashley Hinson Arenholz
Committees itemized $1,421,000 in contributions to this campaign.
| Kind of committee | Amount | % Share | Committees | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leadership PACs | $462,500 | 32.5% | 69 | 102 |
| Corporate PACs | $359,000 | 25.3% | 101 | 129 |
| Trade association PACs | $214,500 | 15.1% | 53 | 79 |
| Non-connected committees | $185,500 | 13.1% | 33 | 49 |
| Membership organization PACs | $80,500 | 5.7% | 15 | 25 |
| Other candidates' committees | $79,000 | 5.6% | 8 | 10 |
| Cooperative PACs | $25,000 | 1.8% | 5 | 10 |
| Corporations without capital stock | $10,000 | 0.7% | 3 | 3 |
| Labor union PACs | $5,000 | 0.4% | 1 | 1 |
| Itemized total for this direction | $1,421,000 |
Spent supporting Ashley Hinson Arenholz
Committees itemized $2,975,767 in independent spending supporting Ashley Hinson Arenholz.
| Kind of committee | Amount | % Share | Committees | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-connected committees | $2,975,767 | 100.0% | 2 | 21 |
| Itemized total for this direction | $2,975,767 |
Spent opposing Ashley Hinson Arenholz
Committees itemized $2,043,033 in independent spending opposing Ashley Hinson Arenholz.
| Kind of committee | Amount | % Share | Committees | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-connected committees | $2,043,033 | 100.0% | 1 | 19 |
| Itemized total for this direction | $2,043,033 |
What interests those committees advance
The FEC publishes no industry or interest field, so unlike the section above this one is a claim MyRepTracker makes. A committee is placed here only when there is a document behind the claim that a reader can open: its own statement of organization, its own published mission statement, or a named third party. Every assignment carries that document on the committee's own page. A committee's name is never evidence of anything.
Categorized is not the same as reviewed. Most of these sectors were assigned by machine from the committee's own filing rather than read by a person. Each committee's own page says which of the two its assignment is, and names the document behind it either way.
Coverage is partial on purpose, and the part that is not covered is shown at full size rather than left out. Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees are excluded outright: their giving is an officeholder's or a party's decision, so no interest label describes it. Categories are taxonomy interest-1.7.
Contributed to Ashley Hinson Arenholz
Committees itemized $1,421,000 in contributions to this campaign. $541,500 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $879,500, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $538,500 and committees not yet categorized account for $341,000.
| Interest | Amount | % Share | Committees | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food and beverage Agriculture | $64,000 | 7.3% | 14 | 22 |
| Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate | $51,000 | 5.8% | 16 | 21 |
| Agribusiness Agriculture | $45,000 | 5.1% | 15 | 21 |
| Pharmaceuticals Health | $45,000 | 5.1% | 15 | 17 |
| Physicians and medical specialties Health | $36,500 | 4.2% | 7 | 13 |
| Construction Construction | $35,000 | 4.0% | 8 | 9 |
| Defense Defense | $31,000 | 3.5% | 7 | 9 |
| Oil and gas Energy and natural resources | $31,000 | 3.5% | 8 | 9 |
| Health insurance Health | $20,000 | 2.3% | 3 | 5 |
| Media and entertainment Communications and technology | $18,500 | 2.1% | 3 | 6 |
| Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate | $17,500 | 2.0% | 4 | 4 |
| Securities and investment Finance, insurance, and real estate | $17,000 | 1.9% | 6 | 6 |
| Telecommunications Communications and technology | $17,000 | 1.9% | 4 | 6 |
| Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue | $16,000 | 1.8% | 3 | 6 |
| Electric utilities Energy and natural resources | $15,500 | 1.8% | 3 | 5 |
| Automotive Transportation | $14,000 | 1.6% | 3 | 5 |
| Trucking Transportation | $14,000 | 1.6% | 3 | 4 |
| Commercial banking Finance, insurance, and real estate | $8,000 | 0.9% | 3 | 3 |
| Technology Communications and technology | $8,000 | 0.9% | 4 | 4 |
| Nurses and nursing specialties Health | $7,500 | 0.9% | 2 | 2 |
| Accounting Professional services | $5,000 | 0.6% | 1 | 1 |
| Air transport Transportation | $5,000 | 0.6% | 3 | 3 |
| Hospitals and nursing homes Health | $5,000 | 0.6% | 1 | 1 |
| Transportation unions Labor | $5,000 | 0.6% | 1 | 1 |
| Credit unions Finance, insurance, and real estate | $2,500 | 0.3% | 1 | 2 |
| Mining Energy and natural resources | $2,500 | 0.3% | 1 | 1 |
| Lawyers and law firms Professional services | $1,000 | 0.1% | 1 | 1 |
| Renewable energy Energy and natural resources | $1,000 | 0.1% | 1 | 1 |
| Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. | $541,500 | Not applicable | 77 | 112 |
| Committees not yet categorized | $341,000 | 38.8% | 70 | 108 |
| Base the shares are taken over | $879,500 | 100% | ||
| Itemized total for this direction | $1,421,000 |
Spent supporting Ashley Hinson Arenholz
Committees itemized $2,975,767 in independent spending supporting Ashley Hinson Arenholz. Of that, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $2,965,090 and committees not yet categorized account for $10,677.
| Interest | Amount | % Share | Committees | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue | $2,965,090 | 99.6% | 1 | 20 |
| Committees not yet categorized | $10,677 | 0.4% | 1 | 1 |
| Base the shares are taken over | $2,975,767 | 100% | ||
| Itemized total for this direction | $2,975,767 |
Spent opposing Ashley Hinson Arenholz
Committees itemized $2,043,033 in independent spending opposing Ashley Hinson Arenholz. Of that, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $2,043,033 and committees not yet categorized account for $0.
| Interest | Amount | % Share | Committees | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue | $2,043,033 | 100.0% | 1 | 19 |
| Base the shares are taken over | $2,043,033 | 100% | ||
| Itemized total for this direction | $2,043,033 |
Last-minute contributions reported before an election
In the days just before an election, a campaign must tell the FEC within 48 hours about any contribution or loan of $1,000 or more. These notices arrive faster than the regular reporting schedule, and the same money is reported again in the report covering those days. Nothing here is added to receipts: it is a preview of money the ordinary reports will carry, not money beside them.
Reported on notices
Still only provisional
The most recent notice was filed on May 31, 2026. A notice stops being the only record of its money once a regular report covers the same days; those are marked reconciled below and the amounts appear in Ashley Hinson Arenholz's reported totals through the ordinary schedule.
| Filed | Amount | Entries | Covers | State | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2026 | $1,000 | 1 | May 30 to May 30, 2026 | Covered by a regular report | FEC filing ↗ |
| May 30, 2026 | $16,000 | 4 | May 29 to May 29, 2026 | Covered by a regular report | FEC filing ↗ |
| May 29, 2026 | $4,500 | 3 | May 28 to May 28, 2026 | Covered by a regular report | FEC filing ↗ |
| May 28, 2026 | $23,000 | 8 | May 27 to May 28, 2026 | Covered by a regular report | FEC filing ↗ |
| May 27, 2026 | $54,500 | 20 | May 26 to May 26, 2026 | Covered by a regular report | FEC filing ↗ |
| May 26, 2026 | $1,000 | 1 | May 25 to May 25, 2026 | Covered by a regular report | FEC filing ↗ |
| May 22, 2026 | $8,000 | 4 | May 21 to May 22, 2026 | Covered by a regular report | FEC filing ↗ |
| May 21, 2026 | $6,000 | 4 | May 20 to May 20, 2026 | Covered by a regular report | FEC filing ↗ |
| May 20, 2026 | $12,500 | 4 | May 19 to May 20, 2026 | Covered by a regular report | FEC filing ↗ |
| May 19, 2026 | $36,000 | 17 | May 18 to May 18, 2026 | Covered by a regular report | FEC filing ↗ |
The 10 most recent notices of 12 are listed. The amount and count above cover all of them.
Where the individual money was reported from
Contributions from individuals that the campaign itemized, grouped by the state each contributor gave as their address. Contributions of $200 or less in aggregate are not itemized and carry no address, so they are not here at all. These places account for $4,265,138 of the $7,982,005 this campaign reported from individuals and from transfers by its other authorized committees, across 10,490 itemized contributions.
From Iowa
From everywhere else
Money from outside Iowa is not money from outside the country, and neither figure is evidence that anything unlawful happened. People may contribute to campaigns in states they do not live in, and United States citizens living abroad may contribute at all.
What kind of place it came from
| Kind of place | Amount | Contributions | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| States and the District of ColumbiaContributors who gave an address in one of the fifty states or the District of Columbia. | $4,251,138 | 10,485 | 99.7% |
| United States territoriesPuerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands. | $14,000 | 5 | 0.3% |
Places, largest first
Top 10 of 51 places shown as bars. Every place is in the table below.
| Place | Amount | Contributions | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa this campaign's state | $1,860,124 | 2,952 | 43.6% |
| California | $444,355 | 870 | 10.4% |
| New York | $316,445 | 295 | 7.4% |
| Florida | $299,268 | 990 | 7.0% |
| Virginia | $250,262 | 435 | 5.9% |
| District of Columbia | $140,505 | 100 | 3.3% |
| Texas | $134,066 | 823 | 3.1% |
| Illinois | $132,326 | 362 | 3.1% |
| Michigan | $74,883 | 209 | 1.8% |
| New Jersey | $57,087 | 182 | 1.3% |
| Massachusetts | $49,598 | 102 | 1.2% |
| Colorado | $47,265 | 94 | 1.1% |
| Tennessee | $43,410 | 202 | 1.0% |
| Maryland | $40,332 | 96 | 0.9% |
| Connecticut | $30,619 | 69 | 0.7% |
| Nevada | $25,075 | 104 | 0.6% |
| Minnesota | $24,378 | 85 | 0.6% |
| North Carolina | $23,426 | 178 | 0.5% |
| Indiana | $23,046 | 151 | 0.5% |
| Ohio | $23,024 | 160 | 0.5% |
| Arkansas | $22,983 | 58 | 0.5% |
| Oklahoma | $18,304 | 115 | 0.4% |
| Missouri | $15,766 | 82 | 0.4% |
| Nebraska | $15,028 | 49 | 0.4% |
| Puerto Rico | $14,000 | 5 | 0.3% |
| Pennsylvania | $13,960 | 161 | 0.3% |
| Georgia | $13,721 | 255 | 0.3% |
| South Dakota | $13,202 | 36 | 0.3% |
| Arizona | $11,184 | 189 | 0.3% |
| Wisconsin | $10,931 | 129 | 0.3% |
| Kansas | $9,819 | 75 | 0.2% |
| South Carolina | $9,444 | 105 | 0.2% |
| Washington | $8,625 | 120 | 0.2% |
| New Hampshire | $6,965 | 26 | 0.2% |
| Kentucky | $5,923 | 53 | 0.1% |
| Louisiana | $5,659 | 94 | 0.1% |
| Idaho | $5,385 | 27 | 0.1% |
| Alabama | $5,381 | 86 | 0.1% |
| Oregon | $4,998 | 53 | 0.1% |
| New Mexico | $3,783 | 67 | 0.1% |
| Alaska | $1,800 | 28 | <0.1% |
| Mississippi | $1,545 | 42 | <0.1% |
| West Virginia | $1,445 | 41 | <0.1% |
| North Dakota | $1,358 | 7 | <0.1% |
| Montana | $1,284 | 16 | <0.1% |
| Utah | $1,057 | 62 | <0.1% |
| Wyoming | $1,001 | 10 | <0.1% |
| Hawaii | $445 | 14 | <0.1% |
| Maine | $341 | 18 | <0.1% |
| Delaware | $301 | 4 | <0.1% |
| Rhode Island | $6 | 4 | <0.1% |
| Reported with a place | $4,265,138 | 10,490 | 100% |
Contributions are transactions, not people: one contributor giving every month is counted once for each contribution. No contributor's name, address, employer, or occupation is stored or shown anywhere on this site.
How this compares
Compared with U.S. Senate campaigns nationwide, 2026 cycle: 410 campaigns with a complete Federal Election Commission record for the cycle, out of 419 on file. This is a position in that group, not a score, a grade, or a judgement about the campaign.
Total receipts
Everything the authorized campaign committee took in for this cycle, including contributions, loans, and transfers.
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| This campaign | $10,217,845 |
| Lowest in the cohort | $0 |
| 25th percentile | $17,760 |
| Median | $216,860 |
| 75th percentile | $2,269,114 |
| Highest in the cohort | $77,279,766 |
| Campaigns counted | 410 |
380 of the 410 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 93th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.
Share of receipts from political committees
Direct contributions from PACs and other political committees as a share of total receipts. Campaigns reporting no receipts at all have no share and are left out of this measure.
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| This campaign | 21.2% |
| Lowest in the cohort | 0.0% |
| 25th percentile | 0.0% |
| Median | 0.4% |
| 75th percentile | 7.0% |
| Highest in the cohort | 88.0% |
| Campaigns counted | 384 |
342 of the 384 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 89th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.
Cash on hand
The balance reported at the end of the coverage period. Campaigns report at different times, so this compares balances as of each campaign's own coverage end.
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| This campaign | $6,749,491 |
| Lowest in the cohort | -$16,841 |
| 25th percentile | $356 |
| Median | $14,751 |
| 75th percentile | $1,192,514 |
| Highest in the cohort | $42,587,451 |
| Campaigns counted | 410 |
384 of the 410 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 94th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.
Outside spending supporting
Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate. This money was never received or controlled by the campaign.
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| This campaign | $2,975,767 |
| Lowest in the cohort | $0 |
| 25th percentile | $0 |
| Median | $0 |
| 75th percentile | $0 |
| Highest in the cohort | $33,915,827 |
| Campaigns counted | 410 |
392 of the 410 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 96th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.
Outside spending opposing
Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| This campaign | $2,043,033 |
| Lowest in the cohort | $0 |
| 25th percentile | $0 |
| Median | $0 |
| 75th percentile | $0 |
| Highest in the cohort | $25,490,183 |
| Campaigns counted | 410 |
385 of the 410 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 94th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.
- 9 of the 419 campaigns on file for this cohort have no complete record for the cycle and are not counted in any figure here.
Every comparison is drawn from one two-year cycle and one office. Only campaigns whose FEC record for that cycle is complete are counted; the rest are reported beside the cohort and are never counted as zero. One authorized committee is counted once however many candidacies report it, so where a candidate's committees are all reported by another FEC record, that record supplies the figures for both. A campaign is never compared with another cycle, with a career total, or with a candidate for a different office.
What these numbers mean
- Receipts are not the same as contributions
- Total receipts include everything the campaign took in, such as contributions, loans, and transfers. Contributions are only the money given by people and committees.
- Direct contributions are not outside spending
- A direct contribution is money received by the campaign's own authorized committee. An independent expenditure is money another organization spent on its own, without coordinating with the campaign. The Federal Election Commission treats these as different activities, and so does this page.
- The organizations named here are political committees
- Direct rankings count what one political committee gave to a campaign; outside-spending rankings count what a committee spent independently. A separate conduit section groups individual contributions only when the campaign's memo record supplies a registered conduit committee's FEC ID. It never attributes donors to employers or interest groups, and it never exposes contributor names. Sites using broader attribution rules may therefore report different organization totals.
- A cycle may be only partly reported
- Filings arrive throughout a two-year cycle. A current cycle shows only what has been filed and processed through the coverage date shown above, so it is not comparable with a finished cycle.
- This view is cycle specific
- It covers the 2026 two-year cycle only.
Source: Federal Election Commission ↗. MyRepTracker ingests FEC records directly and does not add its own influence, risk, or corruption score.