Issue · Budget & Taxes

Budget & Taxes

Every budget & taxes bill, vote, and legislator stance in Illinois, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
3
104th Regular Session
Top supporter
Lisa Hernandez
100% support rate
Top opponent
Neil Anderson
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving budget & taxes in Illinois

Legislators moving budget & taxes in Illinois
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Lisa Hernandez
Lisa Hernandez House · District 2
D
Strong +
100% 26
Eva-Dina Delgado
Eva-Dina Delgado House · District 3
D
Strong +
100% 25
Sharon Chung
Sharon Chung House · District 91
D
Strong +
100% 18
Hoan Huynh
Hoan Huynh House · District 13
D
Strong +
100% 14
Michael Kelly
Michael Kelly House · District 15
D
Strong +
100% 14
Neil Anderson
Neil Anderson Senate · District 47
R
Strong −
0% 10
Chapin Rose
Chapin Rose Senate · District 51
R
Strong −
0% 9
Jil Tracy
Jil Tracy Senate · District 50
R
Strong −
0% 9
Li Arellano
Li Arellano Senate · District 37
R
Strong −
0% 9
Terri Bryant
Terri Bryant Senate · District 58
R
Strong −
0% 9
Showing 3 of 3 bills

All budget & taxes bills

passed · Illinois · House May 7, 2026

HB 4921: MUNI CD-COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS

Amends the Illinois Municipal Code. Provides that the corporate authorities of a municipality may license and regulate all commercial operations within the municipality's boundaries, whether for profit or not for profit, but may not impose any tax upon their operations except as otherwise authorized by law. Limits the definition of "commercial operations" to exclude agritourism operations, agricultural properties, agribusinesses, agritourism activities, agricultural experiences, and pollution control facilities.
in committee · Illinois · House Apr 17, 2026

HB 2851: SPARKLER EXCISE TAX ACT

Creates the Ground-Based Sparkler Purchaser Excise Tax Act. Imposes a tax, beginning July 1, 2025, upon purchasers for the privilege of using ground-based sparklers and not for the purpose of resale at the rate of 6% of the purchase price of ground-based sparklers. Prohibits certain retail combinations or bundles. Requires every retailer required to collect the tax to apply to the Department of Revenue for a certificate of registration. Provides that any retailer required to collect the tax shall be liable to the Department for the tax, whether the tax has been collected, and any such tax shall constitute a debt to the State. Provides for the making of returns. Provides that from the revenue collected, the Department shall pay 25% into the Fireman's Annuity and Benefit Fund, 25% into the Firefighters' Pension Investment Fund, and 50% into the General Revenue Fund. Provides for recordkeeping requirements. Establishes penalties for violations of the Act. Provides that the Department shall have full power to administer and enforce the Act. Allows for the arrest of any person who violates the Act, the search of any place of business to inspect all ground-based sparklers, and the seizure of any ground based-sparklers without a warrant. Sets forth hearing requirements after seizure. Allows the Department to adopt rules. Amends the Fireworks Regulation Act of Illinois. Allows a municipality to prohibit the sale and use of ground-based sparklers on public property. Prohibits ground-based sparklers from being sold to a person under the age of 18 years. Amends the Pyrotechnic Use Act. Prohibits ground-based sparklers from being sold to a person under the age of 18 years. Effective July 1, 2025.
passed · Illinois · House Feb 5, 2025

HR 119: STOP-TARIFF PLANS

This Illinois House resolution (HR 119) calls on President Trump to abandon proposed tariffs, arguing they would increase costs for Illinois families and businesses. It specifically highlights risks to Illinois agriculture (like soybeans), manufacturing, and the state's top trade relationships with Canada and Mexico - impacting thousands of jobs. The resolution does not create new laws but formally opposes the tariff plans based on economic projections of higher living costs and market instability. It is a symbolic statement, not a binding policy change.