Home › Georgia › Elections 2022 › Marcus Flowers

Marcus Flowers

Democratic candidate · 2022 general election · Georgia

MF

Marcus Flowers

Democratic

Races

Campaign finance

FEC data through Dec 31, 2022. Covering the 2022 two-year cycle only.

The 2022 cycle at a glance

Total receipts
$16,972,738
Everything the campaign took in
Individual contributions
$16,877,851
Itemized and unitemized split not reported
PAC and other committees
$23,135
Received from political committees
Campaign spending
$16,349,414
Total disbursements
Cash on hand
$623,323
At the end of the reporting period

Where the money came from

These categories divide total receipts of $16,972,738 exactly once, so they add back up to the reported total.

Receipts by funding category for the 2022 cycle
Source Amount Share of receipts
Individual contributions $16,877,851 99.4%
PAC and other committee contributions $23,135 0.1%
Party committee contributions $100 0.0%
Candidate self-funding $100 0.0%
Loans $18,000 0.1%
Other receipts, including transfers $53,551 0.3%
Total receipts $16,972,738 100%

Financial position

Cash, debt, refunds, loans, and transfers as reported through Dec 31, 2022 for the 2022 cycle. These are factual reported values, not a judgement about whether a campaign is healthy, viable, or strong. Independent expenditures are never added to or subtracted from any of them: that money was never the campaign's.

Reported financial position for the 2022 cycle
Measure Amount
Cash on hand at coverage end $623,323
Debts and obligations owed by the committee $0
Debts and obligations owed to the committee Not reported
Contributions refunded to individuals $312,837
Contributions refunded to committees $0
Transfers received from other authorized committeesAlready raised money moving between the candidate's own committees, not new fundraising. $0
Transfers made to other authorized committees $1,000
Repayments of candidate loans $18,000
Repayments of other loans $0

Calculated from the reported values

Each row below is arithmetic MyRepTracker performed on the values above. Where the FEC published the figure itself, the row says so and no calculation was made.

Values calculated from the reported financial position, with the formula for each
Measure Amount How it was produced
Contributions net of refunds $16,588,349 Calculated as individual + committee + party + candidate contributions, minus contributions refunded to individuals and committees.
Operating expenditures net of offsets Not reported An input this calculation needs is not published by the source behind this record.
Outstanding candidate loans $0 Calculated as loans received from the candidate minus repayments of those loans.
Other outstanding loans $0 Calculated as other loans received minus repayments of those loans.
Total contributions refunded $312,837 Calculated as refunds to individuals plus refunds to committees.

Change since the previous filing

Both columns come from committee C00768101, so the two periods are comparable. A change is the difference between what 30G 2022 reported and what YE 2022 reported, and the direction is stated in words rather than shown only as a sign. 30G 2022 reported through Nov 28, 2022 and YE 2022 through Dec 31, 2022.

Financial position at the two most recent controlling filings of committee C00768101
Measure 30G 2022Reported through Nov 28, 2022 YE 2022Reported through Dec 31, 2022 Change
Cash on hand at period end $609,957 $623,323 Up $13,366
Debts owed by the committee $0 $0 No change
Contribution refunds in the period $40,181 $0 Down $40,181

Cash compared with one period's spending

Cash on hand of $623,323 set beside the $31,634 this campaign spent during YE 2022, through Dec 31, 2022, which is 19.7 times that period's spending. This is a ratio between two reported numbers over one named period. It is not a forecast of how long the money will last, and campaigns do not spend evenly across a cycle.

Outside spending

Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with the campaign. This money was never received or controlled by Marcus Flowers. Supporting and opposing spending are kept apart rather than combined into one number, and neither is added to campaign receipts.

Spent supporting

$10,633
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

Spent opposing

$0
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

What the money was spent on

These spending categories were produced by taxonomy spend-1.2 and the current rules are spend-1.3, so they are withheld until this record is refreshed.

Political committees that contributed directly

Money received by the authorized campaign committee from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.

This total will usually differ from the PAC figure in the summary above. The summary is what the campaign reported receiving in total; this ranking adds up the individual contributions that were itemized, which is a different record made at a different time. Neither is a correction of the other, and the gap is not an error in either one.

All 7 shown $23,025 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Aug 16, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Political committees ranked by direct contributions
Rank Committee Amount Share Transactions Last activity
1 VOTEVETS C00418897 $10,000 43.4% 4 Mar 18, 2022
2 CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS PAC C00147512 $5,000 21.7% 1 Sep 29, 2021
3 THE COLLECTIVE PAC C00617381 $4,000 17.4% 1 Aug 30, 2021
4 NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN, INC. PAC C00092247 $2,500 10.9% 1 Aug 17, 2022
5 GREATER OPPORTUNITIES FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT (GOLD PAC) C00452748 $1,000 4.3% 1 Sep 2, 2022
6 MORE BLUE C00766220 $500 2.2% 1 Mar 2, 2022
7 LEFT COAST VOTER C00763037 $25 0.1% 1 Jul 29, 2021

Organizations spending independently

Supporting Marcus Flowers

1 organization shown $10,633 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Aug 16, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Organizations ranked by independent spending supporting this candidate
Rank Committee Amount Share Transactions Last activity
1 VoteVets C00418897 $10,633 100.0% 2 May 6, 2021

Opposing Marcus Flowers

No opposing independent expenditures are reported for this cycle.

What that outside spending purchased

Each independent expenditure carries a short description the spending committee wrote, and these categories are those descriptions sorted under taxonomy outside-1.0. Spending supporting Marcus Flowers and spending opposing them are broken down separately and never combined, and every share below is a share of that one direction's total.

The largest category is usually "Advertising, medium not specified". That is not a leftover: it is spending the committee described only as a media buy or as advertising, without saying whether it aired on television, ran online, or arrived in the mail. MyRepTracker reports what was filed rather than assigning it a medium.

Supporting Marcus Flowers

Independent spending supporting this candidate, by reported purpose for the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Purpose Amount % Share Transactions
Digital and online advertising $10,633 100.0% 2
Classified $10,633 100.0%
Unclassified filing descriptions $0 0.0%
Total independent spending $10,633 100% 2

Opposing Marcus Flowers

No independent expenditures in this direction are reported for this cycle.

Who the committees behind this money were

Every committee here is placed by the registration it filed with the FEC for the 2022 cycle: its designation, its committee type, and the organizational form it reported. That is the FEC's own record and involves no judgement by MyRepTracker, so this covers every itemized dollar. A committee's registration can change between cycles, and each cycle is judged by its own.

Contributed to Marcus Flowers

Committees itemized $23,025 in contributions to this campaign.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committee Amount % Share Committees Transactions
Non-connected committees $22,025 95.7% 6 9
Leadership PACs $1,000 4.3% 1 1
Itemized total for this direction $23,025

Spent supporting Marcus Flowers

Committees itemized $10,633 in independent spending supporting Marcus Flowers.

Independent spenders supporting this candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committee Amount % Share Committees Transactions
Non-connected committees $10,633 100.0% 1 2
Itemized total for this direction $10,633

What interests those committees advance

The FEC publishes no industry or interest field, so unlike the section above this one is a claim MyRepTracker makes. A committee is placed here only when there is a document behind the claim that a reader can open: its own statement of organization, its own published mission statement, or a named third party. Every assignment carries that document on the committee's own page. A committee's name is never evidence of anything.

Categorized is not the same as reviewed. Most of these sectors were assigned by machine from the committee's own filing rather than read by a person. Each committee's own page says which of the two its assignment is, and names the document behind it either way.

Coverage is partial on purpose, and the part that is not covered is shown at full size rather than left out. Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees are excluded outright: their giving is an officeholder's or a party's decision, so no interest label describes it. Categories are taxonomy interest-1.7.

Contributed to Marcus Flowers

Committees itemized $23,025 in contributions to this campaign. $1,000 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $22,025, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $10,000 and committees not yet categorized account for $12,025.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Interest Amount % Share Committees Transactions
Veterans Ideological and single-issue $10,000 45.4% 1 4
Committees not yet categorized $12,025 54.6% 5 5
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. $1,000 Not applicable 1 1
Base the shares are taken over $22,025 100%
Itemized total for this direction $23,025

Spent supporting Marcus Flowers

Committees itemized $10,633 in independent spending supporting Marcus Flowers. Of that, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $10,633 and committees not yet categorized account for $0.

Independent spenders supporting this candidate, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Interest Amount % Share Committees Transactions
Veterans Ideological and single-issue $10,633 100.0% 1 2
Base the shares are taken over $10,633 100%
Itemized total for this direction $10,633

Last-minute contributions reported before an election

In the days just before an election, a campaign must tell the FEC within 48 hours about any contribution or loan of $1,000 or more. These notices arrive faster than the regular reporting schedule, and the same money is reported again in the report covering those days. Nothing here is added to receipts: it is a preview of money the ordinary reports will carry, not money beside them.

Reported on notices

$72,510
Across 12 notices, received May 10, 2022 to Nov 4, 2022

Still only provisional

$0
Every notice is now covered by a regular report

The most recent notice was filed on Nov 5, 2022. A notice stops being the only record of its money once a regular report covers the same days; those are marked reconciled below and the amounts appear in Marcus Flowers's reported totals through the ordinary schedule.

48-hour notices filed for the 2022 cycle, newest first
Filed Amount Entries Covers State Filing
Nov 5, 2022 $3,005 3 Nov 3 to Nov 4, 2022 Covered by a regular report FEC filing ↗
Nov 3, 2022 $9,400 6 Nov 1 to Nov 2, 2022 Covered by a regular report FEC filing ↗
Nov 1, 2022 $8,900 7 Oct 31 to Oct 31, 2022 Covered by a regular report FEC filing ↗
Oct 30, 2022 $1,000 1 Oct 28 to Oct 28, 2022 Covered by a regular report FEC filing ↗
Oct 28, 2022 $14,600 7 Oct 26 to Oct 27, 2022 Covered by a regular report FEC filing ↗
Oct 26, 2022 $15,800 12 Oct 24 to Oct 25, 2022 Covered by a regular report FEC filing ↗
Oct 22, 2022 $1,000 1 Oct 21 to Oct 21, 2022 Covered by a regular report FEC filing ↗
May 20, 2022 $2,900 1 May 19 to May 19, 2022 Covered by a regular report FEC filing ↗
May 19, 2022 $1,000 1 May 18 to May 18, 2022 Covered by a regular report FEC filing ↗
May 18, 2022 $6,900 5 May 16 to May 16, 2022 Covered by a regular report FEC filing ↗

The 10 most recent notices of 12 are listed. The amount and count above cover all of them.

Where the individual money was reported from

Contributions from individuals that the campaign itemized, grouped by the state each contributor gave as their address. Contributions of $200 or less in aggregate are not itemized and carry no address, so they are not here at all. These places account for $3,595,227 of the $16,877,851 this campaign reported from individuals and from transfers by its other authorized committees, across 49,074 itemized contributions.

From Georgia

$294,523
8.2% of the itemized money that has a place

From everywhere else

$3,300,629
91.8% of the itemized money that has a place

Money from outside Georgia is not money from outside the country, and neither figure is evidence that anything unlawful happened. People may contribute to campaigns in states they do not live in, and United States citizens living abroad may contribute at all.

What kind of place it came from

Itemized individual contributions by kind of place, 2022 cycle
Kind of place Amount Contributions Share
States and the District of ColumbiaContributors who gave an address in one of the fifty states or the District of Columbia. $3,585,139 48,935 99.7%
United States territoriesPuerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands. $445 5 <0.1%
Armed Forces addressesMilitary mailing addresses used by service members stationed away from home. They are real addresses; they are simply not states. $250 1 <0.1%
Addresses outside the United StatesContributors who gave an address abroad. United States citizens living overseas may contribute, and this figure is not evidence that anyone gave unlawfully. $9,318 130 0.3%
Not placedContributions the FEC could not attribute to a place. They are reported here and are never assigned to a state or counted in the in-state and out-of-state split. $75 3 Not counted

Places, largest first

Top 10 of 55 places shown as bars. Every place is in the table below.

  • California $712,162
  • Georgia this campaign's state $294,523
  • New York $287,586
  • Florida $183,263
  • Massachusetts $179,822
  • Texas $168,096
  • Washington $163,080
  • Illinois $120,675
  • Virginia $106,048
  • Pennsylvania $99,424
Every place with itemized individual contributions reported for the 2022 cycle
Place Amount Contributions Share
California $712,162 9,463 19.8%
Georgia this campaign's state $294,523 3,530 8.2%
New York $287,586 3,554 8.0%
Florida $183,263 2,744 5.1%
Massachusetts $179,822 1,940 5.0%
Texas $168,096 2,186 4.7%
Washington $163,080 2,346 4.5%
Illinois $120,675 1,592 3.4%
Virginia $106,048 1,339 2.9%
Pennsylvania $99,424 1,512 2.8%
Colorado $96,340 1,207 2.7%
Maryland $91,048 1,465 2.5%
North Carolina $82,742 1,128 2.3%
Oregon $82,651 1,226 2.3%
New Jersey $82,101 1,226 2.3%
Arizona $71,946 1,016 2.0%
Connecticut $65,420 775 1.8%
Tennessee $51,915 541 1.4%
Michigan $51,746 884 1.4%
Ohio $49,344 846 1.4%
District of Columbia $41,109 391 1.1%
Minnesota $39,178 739 1.1%
New Mexico $37,518 582 1.0%
Wisconsin $30,309 528 0.8%
Indiana $29,514 267 0.8%
South Carolina $27,523 407 0.8%
Missouri $27,085 605 0.8%
Alabama $26,224 351 0.7%
Oklahoma $22,673 270 0.6%
New Hampshire $19,143 307 0.5%
Nevada $18,842 279 0.5%
Rhode Island $18,775 157 0.5%
Kentucky $18,219 322 0.5%
Louisiana $17,315 322 0.5%
Hawaii $17,210 303 0.5%
Idaho $15,848 302 0.4%
Utah $15,589 362 0.4%
Iowa $15,052 203 0.4%
Arkansas $14,025 116 0.4%
Wyoming $12,261 170 0.3%
Kansas $11,870 243 0.3%
Vermont $11,122 185 0.3%
Maine $10,809 158 0.3%
Nebraska $10,587 176 0.3%
Montana $9,768 132 0.3%
Foreign countries $9,318 130 0.3%
Delaware $6,825 138 0.2%
Alaska $6,798 133 0.2%
South Dakota $6,294 143 0.2%
Mississippi $4,952 55 0.1%
West Virginia $2,585 48 0.1%
Puerto Rico $445 5 <0.1%
Armed Forces Europe $250 1 <0.1%
North Dakota $185 21 <0.1%
Not reported not placed $75 3 Not counted
Reported with a place $3,595,152 49,071 100%

Contributions are transactions, not people: one contributor giving every month is counted once for each contribution. No contributor's name, address, employer, or occupation is stored or shown anywhere on this site.

  • $75 could not be attributed to a place and is left out of the in-state and out-of-state figures rather than assigned to a state.

How this compares

Compared with U.S. House campaigns in Georgia, 2022 cycle: 44 campaigns with a complete Federal Election Commission record for the cycle. This is a position in that group, not a score, a grade, or a judgement about the campaign.

Total receipts

Everything the authorized campaign committee took in for this cycle, including contributions, loans, and transfers.

  • This campaign $16,972,738
  • Cohort median $148,464
Total receipts for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Georgia, 2022 cycle
Measure Value
This campaign $16,972,738
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$6,790
Median$148,464
75th percentile$1,152,789
Highest in the cohort$16,972,738
Campaigns counted 44

43 of the 44 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 98th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Share of receipts from political committees

Direct contributions from PACs and other political committees as a share of total receipts. Campaigns reporting no receipts at all have no share and are left out of this measure.

  • This campaign 0.1%
  • Cohort median 6.1%
Share of receipts from political committees for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Georgia, 2022 cycle
Measure Value
This campaign 0.1%
Lowest in the cohort0.0%
25th percentile0.0%
Median6.1%
75th percentile33.0%
Highest in the cohort84.2%
Campaigns counted 39

12 of the 39 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 31th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Cash on hand

The balance reported at the end of the coverage period. Campaigns report at different times, so this compares balances as of each campaign's own coverage end.

  • This campaign $623,323
  • Cohort median $1,714
Cash on hand for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Georgia, 2022 cycle
Measure Value
This campaign $623,323
Lowest in the cohort-$13,741
25th percentile$0
Median$1,714
75th percentile$63,785
Highest in the cohort$1,958,194
Campaigns counted 44

37 of the 44 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 84th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending supporting

Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate. This money was never received or controlled by the campaign.

  • This campaign $10,633
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending supporting for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Georgia, 2022 cycle
Measure Value
This campaign $10,633
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$5,133,991
Campaigns counted 44

34 of the 44 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 77th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending opposing

Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.

  • This campaign $0
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending opposing for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Georgia, 2022 cycle
Measure Value
This campaign $0
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$2,878,794
Campaigns counted 44

0 of the 44 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 0th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Every comparison is drawn from one two-year cycle and one office. Only campaigns whose FEC record for that cycle is complete are counted; the rest are reported beside the cohort and are never counted as zero. One authorized committee is counted once however many candidacies report it, so where a candidate's committees are all reported by another FEC record, that record supplies the figures for both. A campaign is never compared with another cycle, with a career total, or with a candidate for a different office.

What these numbers mean

Receipts are not the same as contributions
Total receipts include everything the campaign took in, such as contributions, loans, and transfers. Contributions are only the money given by people and committees.
Direct contributions are not outside spending
A direct contribution is money received by the campaign's own authorized committee. An independent expenditure is money another organization spent on its own, without coordinating with the campaign. The Federal Election Commission treats these as different activities, and so does this page.
The organizations named here are political committees
Direct rankings count what one political committee gave to a campaign; outside-spending rankings count what a committee spent independently. A separate conduit section groups individual contributions only when the campaign's memo record supplies a registered conduit committee's FEC ID. It never attributes donors to employers or interest groups, and it never exposes contributor names. Sites using broader attribution rules may therefore report different organization totals.
A cycle may be only partly reported
Filings arrive throughout a two-year cycle. A current cycle shows only what has been filed and processed through the coverage date shown above, so it is not comparable with a finished cycle.
This view is cycle specific
It covers the 2022 two-year cycle only.

Source: Federal Election Commission ↗. MyRepTracker ingests FEC records directly and does not add its own influence, risk, or corruption score.