Environment

signed · Arizona · House Jun 4, 2026

HB 2428: emissions; reduction credits; counties

HB 2428 clarifies jurisdiction over air pollution permits in Arizona, giving the state Department of Environmental Quality primary authority for major sources like power plants and refineries in counties without approved air plans. It allows counties to issue voluntary permits for emission reduction credits related to portable and mobile sources (like vehicles or temporary equipment). This affects local air agencies, businesses needing permits, and entities seeking to certify emission reductions under state law. The bill modifies existing permit procedures without changing pollution standards or creating new emission requirements.

Topics ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentClarifies DEQ authority for major sources and enables voluntary emission credits, promoting pollution control and regulatory clarity for air quality.85% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

signed · Arizona · House Jun 4, 2026

HB 2078: reclamation plans; aggregate mining; notice

HB 2078 updates Arizona's requirements for reclamation plans at aggregate mining sites. It requires mining operators to notify residential property owners within a half-mile of the operation about proposed reclamation plans, using prior public notices (like zoning applications) if published within that radius. The bill specifies that reclamation plans must include detailed measures for erosion control, revegetation, safety for hazardous areas, and post-mining land use. These changes apply to new reclamation plans submitted on or after September 15, 2024.

Topics ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentRequires detailed erosion control, revegetation, and safety measures in mining reclamation plans, strengthening post-mining environmental restoration standards.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

signed · Arizona · House Jun 4, 2026

HB 2096: forgivable financial assistance; cesspool remediation

HB 2096 creates a program for Arizona counties to receive **forgivable financial assistance** from the Water Infrastructure Finance Authority to remediate cesspools posing risks to water quality, groundwater, or public health. It directly affects counties with high-risk cesspools, prioritizing projects in groundwater vulnerability zones, near surface waters, or in low-to-moderate income communities. Key provisions include: forgivable principal (no repayment required) for replacing cesspools with approved on-site systems or sewer connections, no voter approval needed for this assistance (unlike standard loans), and mandatory coordination with the Department of Environmental Quality. Counties must use funds exclusively for eliminating existing cesspools and cannot apply income-based eligibility to abandoned properties. The bill is proposed legislation (prefiled in 2025) and not yet enacted.

Topics ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentBill funds cesspool remediation to protect water quality and groundwater, directly reducing pollution risks to natural resources and public health. Explicit environmental protection intent.95% confidence ✓ HealthcareSupports HealthcareBill explicitly targets cesspool remediation to protect public health by addressing water contamination risks, aligning with healthcare's public health component.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

passed both · Arizona · House Apr 21, 2026

HCR 2057: supporting geothermal energy

HCR 2057 is a concurrent resolution supporting geothermal energy development in Arizona. It calls for state agencies (including the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, Department of Environmental Quality, and others) to create a standardized permitting process for next-generation geothermal projects. The resolution does not create new laws but urges agencies to align existing rules to make permitting more predictable for developers. It directly affects geothermal energy companies and Arizona's regulatory agencies by promoting streamlined project approvals. The resolution passed the House and is now moving to the Senate.

Topics ✓ EnergySupports EnergyBill explicitly supports geothermal energy development by urging standardized permitting for renewable projects, advancing clean energy infrastructure and reducing developer barriers.95% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentPromotes geothermal energy development, a clean energy source, advancing environmental protection by facilitating renewable energy projects.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

Track

passed both · Arizona · House Apr 21, 2026

HCM 2009: subsurface minerals; access; federal policy

HCM 2009 is a memorial from Arizona's legislature requesting the federal government to address barriers to accessing subsurface minerals (like copper) under federal land withdrawals, such as national monuments in Arizona. It asks Congress to amend the Antiquities Act to require state consent for new monuments, compensate Arizona for inaccessible mineral rights, and streamline mining permits. The memorial also seeks to rescind specific federal regulations (43 CFR 3809) that Arizona claims incorrectly treat patented surface lands as public lands, complicating mineral exploration. This would primarily affect Arizona's state land department and private mineral exploration companies by reducing regulatory hurdles to develop critical minerals.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentRequests deregulation of mining access on federal lands by amending Antiquities Act and rescinding regulations, prioritizing mineral extraction over environmental protections.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track

passed both · Arizona · House Apr 20, 2026

HCM 2006: endangered species act; urging reform

This Arizona legislative memorial (HCM 2006) urges federal agencies and Congress to reform the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and Migratory Bird Conservation Act. It requests that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management, and Forest Service reduce regulatory burdens on ranchers and prevent lease cancellations on federally managed grazing lands due to ESA implementation. The memorial specifically cites concerns about ranchers being unfairly evicted from grazing lands and seeks to align federal policy with "long-standing agricultural practices" in Arizona. As a non-binding memorial, it does not directly change laws but formally requests federal action to address these specific impacts on rural ranching communities.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill explicitly urges reform to reduce ESA regulatory burdens on ranchers and prevent lease cancellations due to ESA implementation, directly weakening environmental protections.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track

passed both · Arizona · House Apr 20, 2026

HCM 2011: Mexican wolf; delist; urging support

This Arizona state memorial (HCM 2011) urges Congress to delist the Mexican wolf from the federal endangered species list. It claims the wolf population has exceeded recovery goals since 2014 (286 wild wolves in 2024) and no longer requires ESA protections. The memorial specifically requests Congress pass H.R. 4255 to remove the wolf from the list, defund the federal reintroduction project, transfer management to states, and ensure full compensation for ranchers' livestock losses. It does not create new law but advocates for policy changes to end federal management of the species.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentUrges delisting Mexican wolf from ESA, defunding federal protections, and transferring management to states - directly weakens endangered species conservation under the Endangered Species Act.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track

vetoed · Arizona · House Apr 13, 2026

HB 2787: federal nullification; Mexican wolf; reintroduction

HB 2787 prohibits Arizona state agencies, employees, and political subdivisions from using state resources to enforce, administer, or cooperate with the federal Mexican wolf reintroduction program under the Endangered Species Act. It directly affects state government operations by banning state involvement in the wolf program, though it exempts the existing livestock loss program managed by the Livestock Loss Board. The bill does not change federal law but aims to limit state-level support for the program, which the legislature claims has exceeded population goals since 2014 and causes economic harm to ranchers. The bill focuses on state authority over resource use, not altering the federal program itself.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBlocks state support for federal Mexican wolf reintroduction under ESA, directly restricting endangered species conservation efforts and weakening environmental protection initiatives.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track

signed · Arizona · House Apr 13, 2026

HB 2029: water conservation grant fund; disclosure

HB 2029 creates a Water Conservation Grant Fund to support water-saving projects in Arizona. It allows eligible entities (like local governments or nonprofits partnering with them) to apply for grants for conservation programs (up to $3 million) or projects (up to $250,000), requiring a 25% match from other sources. Applicants must disclose projected water savings, the source of saved water (groundwater or surface water), and their plan for using the saved water. The Water Infrastructure Finance Authority must adopt implementing rules within 90 days of the bill's effective date.

Topics ✓ Budget & TaxesSupports Budget & TaxesCreates state-funded grant program for water conservation, allocating budget resources to support conservation initiatives.90% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentCreates grant fund for water conservation projects requiring disclosure of water savings and usage plans, directly advancing environmental conservation efforts.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

signed · Arizona · House Apr 13, 2026

HB 2117: natural resource conservation board; fund

HB 2117 redirects $17 of the $25 annual fee for Arizona's environmental special license plates into a dedicated fund. The state natural resource conservation board will distribute $5,000 to $10,000 annually to each natural resource conservation district with an established education center. These funds must support environmental education programs that are scientifically based and address economic and social implications. The bill specifies that funds are exclusively for conservation education programs at local districts, without changing the plate fee structure.

Topics ✓ Budget & TaxesSupports Budget & TaxesRedirects $17 of license plate fee into dedicated fund for conservation education programs, advancing fiscal allocation for environmental education within budget framework.95% confidence ✓ EducationSupports EducationRedirects $17 annual fee to fund environmental education programs at conservation districts with specific requirements for scientifically-based curriculum.85% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentRedirects $17 of license plate fees to conservation education fund, mandating scientifically based environmental programs addressing conservation. Explicitly funds conservation efforts.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment