Issue · Environment

Environment

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in Arizona, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
17
57th Legislature - Second Regular Session
Top supporter
Flavio Bravo
68% support rate
Top opponent
Anna Abeytia
40% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving environment in Arizona

Legislators moving environment in Arizona
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Flavio Bravo
Flavio Bravo Senate · District 26
D
Support
68% 22
Lela Alston
Lela Alston Senate · District 5
D
Support
64% 28
Brian Fernandez
Brian Fernandez Senate · District 23
D
Support
64% 25
Pamela Carter
Pamela Carter House · District 4
R
Support
63% 52
Kiana Sears
Kiana Sears Senate · District 9
D
Support
63% 27
Anna Abeytia
Anna Abeytia House · District 24
D
Oppose
40% 45
Stacey Travers
Stacey Travers House · District 12
D
Mixed −
40% 47
Nancy Gutierrez
Nancy Gutierrez House · District 18
D
Mixed −
42% 43
Mariana Sandoval
Mariana Sandoval House · District 23
D
Mixed −
42% 50
Aaron Marquez
Aaron Marquez House · District 5
D
Mixed −
42% 52
Showing 11–17 of 17 bills

All environment bills

passed · Arizona · House Mar 9, 2026

HB 2330: line siting; factors; total environment

HB 2330 requires Arizona's committee to consider environmental and community factors when approving transmission line locations. It mandates evaluation of wildlife habitats, scenic areas, noise levels, public recreation access, and cost impacts on electricity customers. The bill specifically directs special attention to protecting rare species habitats and prohibits requiring construction labor agreements as a condition for project approval. It also allows the committee to override local land-use rules if deemed unreasonably restrictive, while still requiring compliance with pollution standards. This affects utility companies seeking transmission line permits and communities near proposed sites.
passed · Arizona · House Mar 9, 2026

HB 2340: certificate; environmental compatibility; factors

HB 2340 amends Arizona law to define factors committees must consider when reviewing applications for environmental compatibility certificates for projects like power plants or transmission lines. It requires evaluation of nine specific factors, including wildlife habitats, historic sites, noise levels, public access, and cost impacts, with special emphasis on protecting areas with rare species or unique biological value. The bill also prohibits committees from requiring labor agreements (like union contracts) as a condition for approval and limits additional pollution standards beyond existing regulations. This directly affects developers seeking project approvals by mandating these environmental and cost considerations during the review process.
passed · Arizona · House Mar 4, 2026

HB 2052: management plan; water loss; percent

HB 2052 requires Arizona's groundwater management director to establish a 2020-2025 management plan for active groundwater areas. It directly affects municipal water providers (cities, towns, private companies), requiring them to limit water loss in distribution systems to 8% or less of total water entering the system. The bill also allows adjustments to agricultural irrigation water usage limits - reducing them by up to 5% for farms in similar conditions - but prohibits reductions below a minimum threshold. Additionally, it creates a process for some farmers with historical groundwater rights to seek exemptions if their usage prevents groundwater loss or waterlogging.
passed · Arizona · House Feb 26, 2026

HB 2452: comprehensive plans; data centers; nuclear

HB 2452 requires counties in Arizona with over 125,000 residents to include specific land use designations for data centers and small modular reactors in their comprehensive plans. The bill mandates counties to identify sufficient land locations and extents for data center construction and operation, and for larger counties (over 200,000 residents) to designate land for small modular reactors. It also adds provisions for energy planning, including incentives for renewable energy use and policies to support efficient energy consumption. This bill directly affects county planning processes by requiring new land-use considerations for data centers and nuclear energy infrastructure within existing planning frameworks.
failed · Arizona · House Feb 26, 2026

HB 2798: appropriation; Arizona geological survey; study

HB 2798 appropriates funds to the University of Arizona’s Arizona Geological Survey to study minerals and metals needed for advanced nuclear reactors (including generation III+ and IV small modular reactors). The study requires mapping all known mineral reserves across Arizona, detailing quantities and grades for each site. The Geological Survey must submit a final report to state officials and publish it online by a specified deadline. This bill directly affects Arizona’s geological data collection efforts and state officials receiving the findings, with no direct impact on the public or businesses.
failed · Arizona · House Feb 26, 2026

HB 2030: water conservation grant fund; education

HB 2030 establishes a state fund to support voluntary water conservation programs in Arizona. The fund provides grants for projects like rainwater harvesting systems, drought-resistant landscaping, groundwater recharge initiatives, and educational programs teaching water efficiency. It directly affects water users, local governments, and communities implementing these conservation measures by offering financial support for specific, practical water-saving efforts. The bill outlines clear, concrete uses for the funds without specifying new regulations or mandatory requirements.
failed · Arizona · House Feb 26, 2026

HB 2095: assured water supply; well depth

HB 2095 requires developers to obtain either a "certificate of assured water supply" from the state director or a written commitment from a designated city, town, or private water company before selling subdivided land in Arizona's active management areas. It directly affects land developers and real estate transactions, mandating proof of sufficient water supply for new subdivisions. Key provisions include designating cities/towns/private providers with assured water supply (especially those using Central Arizona Project water), exempting mineral extraction developments, and allowing gray water systems to reduce water demand requirements under specific conditions. The bill title mentions "well depth," but the actual text focuses on water supply verification processes, not well depth regulations. This is a procedural requirement for land sales, not a substantive water policy change.
Showing 11 to 17 of 17 bills