Home Washington Elections 2022 Kim Schrier

Kim Schrier

Democratic candidate · 2022 general election · Washington

KS

Kim Schrier

Democratic

Races

Campaign finance

FEC data through Dec 31, 2022. Covering the 2022 two-year cycle only.

The 2022 cycle at a glance

Total receipts
$9,640,767
Everything the campaign took in
Individual contributions
$7,701,486
Itemized and unitemized split not reported
PAC and other committees
$1,243,245
Received from political committees
Campaign spending
$11,003,511
Total disbursements
Cash on hand
$350,390
At the end of the reporting period

Where the money came from

These categories divide total receipts of $9,640,767 exactly once, so they add back up to the reported total.

Receipts by funding category for the 2022 cycle
SourceAmountShare of receipts
Individual contributions$7,701,48679.9%
PAC and other committee contributions$1,243,24512.9%
Party committee contributions$00.0%
Candidate self-funding$00.0%
Loans$00.0%
Other receipts, including transfers$696,0377.2%
Total receipts$9,640,767100%

Financial position

Cash, debt, refunds, loans, and transfers as reported through Dec 31, 2022 for the 2022 cycle. These are factual reported values, not a judgement about whether a campaign is healthy, viable, or strong. Independent expenditures are never added to or subtracted from any of them: that money was never the campaign's.

Reported financial position for the 2022 cycle
MeasureAmount
Cash on hand at coverage end$350,390
Debts and obligations owed by the committee$0
Debts and obligations owed to the committeeNot reported
Contributions refunded to individuals$79,500
Contributions refunded to committees$7,900
Transfers received from other authorized committeesAlready raised money moving between the candidate's own committees, not new fundraising.$578,347
Transfers made to other authorized committees$0
Repayments of candidate loans$0
Repayments of other loans$0

Calculated from the reported values

Each row below is arithmetic MyRepTracker performed on the values above. Where the FEC published the figure itself, the row says so and no calculation was made.

Values calculated from the reported financial position, with the formula for each
MeasureAmountHow it was produced
Contributions net of refunds$8,857,331Calculated as individual + committee + party + candidate contributions, minus contributions refunded to individuals and committees.
Operating expenditures net of offsetsNot reportedAn input this calculation needs is not published by the source behind this record.
Outstanding candidate loans$0Calculated as loans received from the candidate minus repayments of those loans.
Other outstanding loans$0Calculated as other loans received minus repayments of those loans.
Total contributions refunded$87,400Calculated as refunds to individuals plus refunds to committees.

Change since the previous filing

Both columns come from committee C00652628, so the two periods are comparable. A change is the difference between what 30G 2022 reported and what YE 2022 reported, and the direction is stated in words rather than shown only as a sign. 30G 2022 reported through Nov 28, 2022 and YE 2022 through Dec 31, 2022.

Financial position at the two most recent controlling filings of committee C00652628
Measure30G 2022Reported through Nov 28, 2022YE 2022Reported through Dec 31, 2022Change
Cash on hand at period end$390,119$350,390Down $39,730
Debts owed by the committee$0$0No change
Contribution refunds in the period$8,645$1,357Down $7,288

Cash compared with one period's spending

Cash on hand of $350,390 set beside the $56,569 this campaign spent during YE 2022, through Dec 31, 2022, which is 6.2 times that period's spending. This is a ratio between two reported numbers over one named period. It is not a forecast of how long the money will last, and campaigns do not spend evenly across a cycle.

Outside spending

Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with the campaign. This money was never received or controlled by Kim Schrier. Supporting and opposing spending are kept apart rather than combined into one number, and neither is added to campaign receipts.

Spent supporting

$1,182,761
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

Spent opposing

$2,358,100
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

What the money was spent on

These categories divide $10,908,115 of itemized spending across 1,223 transactions, through Dec 31, 2022. That subtotal covers the FEC's published operating-expenditure records, which do not include transfers, loan repayments, refunds, or contributions the campaign made, and is 99.1% of the $11,003,511 in total disbursements reported for the 2022 cycle. Every share below is a share of that subtotal and never of total spending. Purposes were classified under taxonomy spend-1.3.

The difference between that subtotal and total disbursements is spending reported without itemization, which cannot be categorized.

Itemized spending by reported purpose for the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
PurposeAmount% ShareTransactions
Advertising and media $9,051,69783.0%89
Unclassified filing descriptions Spending whose reported purpose could not be placed in the taxonomy. It is counted, not guessed at. $493,8744.5%582
Fundraising and solicitation $467,7774.3%74
Polling and research $426,2663.9%27
Administration, salary, and overhead $269,3182.5%350
Campaign materials $73,6960.7%15
Legal, accounting, and compliance $72,6140.7%27
Technology and digital services $38,7170.4%26
Events $7,9880.1%14
Travel $6,1690.1%19
Classified$10,414,24295.5%
Unclassified filing descriptions$493,8744.5%
Itemized spending categorized here$10,908,115100%1,223

Political committees that contributed directly

Money received by the authorized campaign committee from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.

This total will usually differ from the PAC figure in the summary above. The summary is what the campaign reported receiving in total; this ranking adds up the individual contributions that were itemized, which is a different record made at a different time. Neither is a correction of the other, and the gap is not an error in either one.

Top 5 of 331 shown $1,342,631 total · $91,002 shown here

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Political committees ranked by direct contributions
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1AMERIPAC: THE FUND FOR A GREATER AMERICA C00271338$25,8001.9%9Sep 29, 2022
2D.R.I.V.E. - DEMOCRAT, REPUBLICAN, INDEPENDENT VOTER EDUCATION (THE PAC OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS) C00032979$20,0001.5%4Nov 3, 2022
3DCCC C00000935$15,2021.1%18Nov 2, 2022
4BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS IN DIVERSE GEOGRAPHIC ENVIRONMENTS PAC (BRIDGE PAC) C00399196$15,0001.1%4Oct 18, 2022
5END CITIZENS UNITED C00573261$15,0001.1%4Oct 31, 2022
Show the complete list of 331 committees →

Organizations spending independently

Supporting Kim Schrier

Top 5 of 13 shown $1,182,761 total · $1,042,758 shown here

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Organizations ranked by independent spending supporting this candidate
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1Shield PAC C00770149$760,83764.3%8Oct 22, 2022
2TOGETHER FOR PROGRESS C00818849$80,8286.8%10Oct 27, 2022
3Climate Power Action C00817536$76,9296.5%9Nov 1, 2022
4HUMANE SOCIETY LEGISLATIVE FUND C90009358$71,8836.1%2Oct 29, 2022
5LCV Victory Fund C00486845$52,2824.4%4Sep 7, 2022
Show the complete list of 13 committees →

Opposing Kim Schrier

All 2 shown $2,358,100 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Organizations ranked by independent spending opposing this candidate
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1NRCC C00075820$2,343,10099.4%13Nov 1, 2022
2Working America C90011156$15,0000.6%1Oct 28, 2022

What that outside spending purchased

Each independent expenditure carries a short description the spending committee wrote, and these categories are those descriptions sorted under taxonomy outside-1.0. Spending supporting Kim Schrier and spending opposing them are broken down separately and never combined, and every share below is a share of that one direction's total.

The largest category is usually "Advertising, medium not specified". That is not a leftover: it is spending the committee described only as a media buy or as advertising, without saying whether it aired on television, ran online, or arrived in the mail. MyRepTracker reports what was filed rather than assigning it a medium.

Supporting Kim Schrier

Independent spending supporting this candidate, by reported purpose for the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
PurposeAmount% ShareTransactions
Digital and online advertising $683,49157.8%24
Direct mail $415,90435.2%20
Polling and research $42,5003.6%1
Advertising, medium not specified Reported as a media buy or as advertising, with no medium named. $33,7502.9%6
Phone calls and text messages $6,2310.5%5
Broadcast, cable, and radio advertising $6400.1%2
Staff, administration, and overhead $2450.0%2
Classified$1,182,761100.0%
Unclassified filing descriptions$00.0%
Total independent spending$1,182,761100%60

Opposing Kim Schrier

Independent spending opposing this candidate, by reported purpose for the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
PurposeAmount% ShareTransactions
Advertising, medium not specified Reported as a media buy or as advertising, with no medium named. $2,343,10099.4%13
Digital and online advertising $15,0000.6%1
Classified$2,358,100100.0%
Unclassified filing descriptions$00.0%
Total independent spending$2,358,100100%14

Fundraising channels

Some money arrives through a committee that raised or collected it rather than from a committee that decided to give it. Those committees are listed here instead of among the political committees that contributed, because calling a payment processor or a shared fundraising account a donor would say something the filings do not. None of this is added to, or subtracted from, any total above.

Conduits

A conduit forwards contributions that individuals earmarked for a named candidate. The amounts below come from the receiving campaign's conduit memo records and remain part of its reported individual-contribution total; they are not added to receipts again. MyRepTracker groups only memos carrying a registered conduit committee's FEC ID and does not decode or store contributor names, addresses, employers, occupations, or memo text. The record count is a count of FEC memo records, not donors.

Conduit records shown through Dec 31, 2022 · fetched Sep 8, 2026.

1 organization shown $2,900 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Registered conduits ranked by individuals' earmarked contributions routed through them
RankCommitteeAmountShareFEC memo recordsLast activity
1ACTBLUE C00401224$2,900100.0%1Mar 16, 2021

Who the committees behind this money were

Every committee here is placed by the registration it filed with the FEC for the 2022 cycle: its designation, its committee type, and the organizational form it reported. That is the FEC's own record and involves no judgement by MyRepTracker, so this covers every itemized dollar. A committee's registration can change between cycles, and each cycle is judged by its own.

Contributed to Kim Schrier

Committees itemized $1,342,631 in contributions to this campaign.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Leadership PACs $324,50424.2%85201
Membership organization PACs $229,68817.1%50127
Labor union PACs $226,50016.9%3684
Non-connected committees $215,63716.1%52120
Trade association PACs $186,49513.9%46102
Other candidates' committees $121,3009.0%52100
Cooperative PACs $15,2501.1%46
Party committees $15,2021.1%118
Corporate PACs $8,0550.6%515
Itemized total for this direction$1,342,631

Spent supporting Kim Schrier

Committees itemized $1,182,761 in independent spending supporting Kim Schrier.

Independent spenders supporting this candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Non-connected committees $1,099,00492.9%1049
Trade association PACs $42,2523.6%27
Membership organization PACs $41,5053.5%14
Itemized total for this direction$1,182,761

Spent opposing Kim Schrier

Committees itemized $2,358,100 in independent spending opposing Kim Schrier.

Independent spenders opposing this candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Party committees $2,343,10099.4%113
Non-connected committees $15,0000.6%11
Itemized total for this direction$2,358,100

What interests those committees advance

The FEC publishes no industry or interest field, so unlike the section above this one is a claim MyRepTracker makes. A committee is placed here only when there is a document behind the claim that a reader can open: its own statement of organization, its own published mission statement, or a named third party. Every assignment carries that document on the committee's own page. A committee's name is never evidence of anything.

Categorized is not the same as reviewed. Most of these sectors were assigned by machine from the committee's own filing rather than read by a person. Each committee's own page says which of the two its assignment is, and names the document behind it either way.

Coverage is partial on purpose, and the part that is not covered is shown at full size rather than left out. Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees are excluded outright: their giving is an officeholder's or a party's decision, so no interest label describes it. Categories are taxonomy interest-1.7.

Contributed to Kim Schrier

Committees itemized $1,342,631 in contributions to this campaign. $461,006 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $881,625, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $639,995 and committees not yet categorized account for $241,630.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Physicians and medical specialties Health $246,50028.0%39120
Public sector unions Labor $66,0007.5%1026
Transportation unions Labor $55,5006.3%720
Industrial unions Labor $44,0005.0%614
Building trades unions Labor $32,5003.7%68
Food and beverage Agriculture $24,0002.7%612
Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue $20,0002.3%39
Telecommunications Communications and technology $16,0001.8%25
Agribusiness Agriculture $15,7501.8%1113
Democracy and election reform Ideological and single-issue $15,0001.7%14
Construction Construction $14,5001.6%39
Air transport Transportation $12,0001.4%210
Hospitals and nursing homes Health $12,0001.4%37
Pro-Israel Ideological and single-issue $12,0001.4%24
Lawyers and law firms Professional services $10,0001.1%15
Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate $10,0001.1%46
Electric utilities Energy and natural resources $8,0000.9%15
Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate $7,0000.8%33
Credit unions Finance, insurance, and real estate $5,0000.6%11
Automotive Transportation $3,9950.5%22
LGBTQ rights Ideological and single-issue $2,5000.3%12
Gun control Ideological and single-issue $2,0000.2%12
Media and entertainment Communications and technology $2,0000.2%12
Nurses and nursing specialties Health $2,0000.2%12
Pharmaceuticals Health $1,7500.2%23
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. $461,006Not applicable138319
Committees not yet categorized $241,63027.4%74160
Base the shares are taken over$881,625100%
Itemized total for this direction$1,342,631

Spent supporting Kim Schrier

Committees itemized $1,182,761 in independent spending supporting Kim Schrier. Of that, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $973,834 and committees not yet categorized account for $208,927.

Independent spenders supporting this candidate, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue $760,83764.3%18
Physicians and medical specialties Health $83,7577.1%311
Renewable energy Energy and natural resources $76,9296.5%19
Environmental advocacy Ideological and single-issue $52,2824.4%14
Industrial unions Labor $290.0%11
Committees not yet categorized $208,92717.7%627
Base the shares are taken over$1,182,761100%
Itemized total for this direction$1,182,761

Spent opposing Kim Schrier

Committees itemized $2,358,100 in independent spending opposing Kim Schrier. $2,343,100 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $15,000, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $15,000 and committees not yet categorized account for $0.

Independent spenders opposing this candidate, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Industrial unions Labor $15,000100.0%11
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. $2,343,100Not applicable113
Base the shares are taken over$15,000100%
Itemized total for this direction$2,358,100

Last-minute contributions reported before an election

In the days just before an election, a campaign must tell the FEC within 48 hours about any contribution or loan of $1,000 or more. These notices arrive faster than the regular reporting schedule, and the same money is reported again in the report covering those days. Nothing here is added to receipts: it is a preview of money the ordinary reports will carry, not money beside them.

Reported on notices

$493,203
Across 18 notices, received Jul 14, 2022 to Nov 6, 2022

Still only provisional

$0
Every notice is now covered by a regular report

The most recent notice was filed on Nov 7, 2022. A notice stops being the only record of its money once a regular report covers the same days; those are marked reconciled below and the amounts appear in Kim Schrier's reported totals through the ordinary schedule.

48-hour notices filed for the 2022 cycle, newest first
FiledAmountEntriesCoversStateFiling
Nov 7, 2022$5,0001Nov 6 to Nov 6, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Nov 6, 2022$26,30018Nov 4 to Nov 4, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Nov 4, 2022$35,30020Nov 3 to Nov 3, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Nov 4, 2022$36,28718Nov 2 to Nov 2, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Nov 3, 2022$30,70010Nov 1 to Nov 1, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Nov 2, 2022$71,70033Oct 31 to Oct 31, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Nov 1, 2022$4,5004Oct 29 to Oct 30, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 29, 2022$48,00032Oct 27 to Oct 28, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 27, 2022$23,28712Oct 26 to Oct 26, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 23, 2022$28,97916Oct 21 to Oct 22, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗

The 10 most recent notices of 18 are listed. The amount and count above cover all of them.

Where the individual money was reported from

Contributions from individuals that the campaign itemized, grouped by the state each contributor gave as their address. Contributions of $200 or less in aggregate are not itemized and carry no address, so they are not here at all. These places account for $6,498,329 of the $8,279,833 this campaign reported from individuals and from transfers by its other authorized committees, across 17,890 itemized contributions.

From Washington

$4,897,185
75.4% of the itemized money that has a place

From everywhere else

$1,601,144
24.6% of the itemized money that has a place

Money from outside Washington is not money from outside the country, and neither figure is evidence that anything unlawful happened. People may contribute to campaigns in states they do not live in, and United States citizens living abroad may contribute at all.

What kind of place it came from

Itemized individual contributions by kind of place, 2022 cycle
Kind of placeAmountContributionsShare
States and the District of ColumbiaContributors who gave an address in one of the fifty states or the District of Columbia.$6,497,92917,887>99.9%
United States territoriesPuerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands.$4003<0.1%

Places, largest first

Top 10 of 46 places shown as bars. Every place is in the table below.

  • Washington this campaign's state $4,897,185
  • California $642,020
  • New York $254,400
  • Massachusetts $155,231
  • Texas $71,830
  • District of Columbia $71,057
  • Maryland $48,515
  • Florida $48,218
  • Virginia $35,856
  • Illinois $35,225
Every place with itemized individual contributions reported for the 2022 cycle
PlaceAmountContributionsShare
Washington this campaign's state$4,897,18515,69575.4%
California$642,0208549.9%
New York$254,4002083.9%
Massachusetts$155,2311152.4%
Texas$71,830801.1%
District of Columbia$71,0571121.1%
Maryland$48,515820.7%
Florida$48,218510.7%
Virginia$35,856650.6%
Illinois$35,225560.5%
Oregon$31,076760.5%
Colorado$26,375230.4%
Pennsylvania$24,180400.4%
Connecticut$20,222310.3%
Minnesota$12,043200.2%
Arkansas$11,85050.2%
Kentucky$11,60040.2%
New Jersey$8,716230.1%
Wisconsin$8,70030.1%
Wyoming$7,20040.1%
South Carolina$7,15060.1%
Arizona$6,796220.1%
North Carolina$6,666100.1%
Idaho$6,175160.1%
Ohio$6,142230.1%
Michigan$6,025170.1%
New Mexico$5,465120.1%
Georgia$4,751400.1%
Kansas$3,850180.1%
Utah$3,84040.1%
Maine$3,67560.1%
Vermont$3,0002<0.1%
Missouri$2,6005<0.1%
Oklahoma$2,5002<0.1%
Delaware$1,5002<0.1%
New Hampshire$1,50011<0.1%
Alabama$1,1502<0.1%
Indiana$1,05579<0.1%
Nevada$8003<0.1%
Iowa$5001<0.1%
Alaska$49853<0.1%
Puerto Rico$4003<0.1%
Louisiana$2522<0.1%
Montana$2501<0.1%
West Virginia$2501<0.1%
South Dakota$402<0.1%
Reported with a place$6,498,32917,890100%

Contributions are transactions, not people: one contributor giving every month is counted once for each contribution. No contributor's name, address, employer, or occupation is stored or shown anywhere on this site.

How this compares

Compared with U.S. House campaigns in Washington, 2022 cycle: 31 campaigns with a complete Federal Election Commission record for the cycle. This is a position in that group, not a score, a grade, or a judgement about the campaign.

Total receipts

Everything the authorized campaign committee took in for this cycle, including contributions, loans, and transfers.

  • This campaign $9,640,767
  • Cohort median $426,187
Total receipts for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Washington, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$9,640,767
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$37,136
Median$426,187
75th percentile$2,637,628
Highest in the cohort$9,640,767
Campaigns counted31

30 of the 31 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 97th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Share of receipts from political committees

Direct contributions from PACs and other political committees as a share of total receipts. Campaigns reporting no receipts at all have no share and are left out of this measure.

  • This campaign 12.9%
  • Cohort median 4.8%
Share of receipts from political committees for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Washington, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign12.9%
Lowest in the cohort0.0%
25th percentile0.0%
Median4.8%
75th percentile34.9%
Highest in the cohort63.5%
Campaigns counted30

21 of the 30 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 70th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Cash on hand

The balance reported at the end of the coverage period. Campaigns report at different times, so this compares balances as of each campaign's own coverage end.

  • This campaign $350,390
  • Cohort median $6,350
Cash on hand for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Washington, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$350,390
Lowest in the cohort-$13,099
25th percentile$12
Median$6,350
75th percentile$260,315
Highest in the cohort$2,369,820
Campaigns counted31

24 of the 31 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 77th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending supporting

Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate. This money was never received or controlled by the campaign.

  • This campaign $1,182,761
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending supporting for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Washington, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$1,182,761
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$2,983
Highest in the cohort$1,182,761
Campaigns counted31

30 of the 31 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 97th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending opposing

Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.

  • This campaign $2,358,100
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending opposing for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Washington, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$2,358,100
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$7,322,982
Campaigns counted31

28 of the 31 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 90th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Every comparison is drawn from one two-year cycle and one office. Only campaigns whose FEC record for that cycle is complete are counted; the rest are reported beside the cohort and are never counted as zero. One authorized committee is counted once however many candidacies report it, so where a candidate's committees are all reported by another FEC record, that record supplies the figures for both. A campaign is never compared with another cycle, with a career total, or with a candidate for a different office.

What these numbers mean

Receipts are not the same as contributions
Total receipts include everything the campaign took in, such as contributions, loans, and transfers. Contributions are only the money given by people and committees.
Direct contributions are not outside spending
A direct contribution is money received by the campaign's own authorized committee. An independent expenditure is money another organization spent on its own, without coordinating with the campaign. The Federal Election Commission treats these as different activities, and so does this page.
The organizations named here are political committees
Direct rankings count what one political committee gave to a campaign; outside-spending rankings count what a committee spent independently. A separate conduit section groups individual contributions only when the campaign's memo record supplies a registered conduit committee's FEC ID. It never attributes donors to employers or interest groups, and it never exposes contributor names. Sites using broader attribution rules may therefore report different organization totals.
A cycle may be only partly reported
Filings arrive throughout a two-year cycle. A current cycle shows only what has been filed and processed through the coverage date shown above, so it is not comparable with a finished cycle.
This view is cycle specific
It covers the 2022 two-year cycle only.

Source: Federal Election Commission ↗. MyRepTracker ingests FEC records directly and does not add its own influence, risk, or corruption score.