Home Virginia Elections 2026 Robert Wittman

Robert Wittman

Republican candidate · 2026 general election · Virginia

Photo of Robert Wittman

Robert Wittman

Republican

Currently serving in the U.S. House District 1.

Races

Campaign finance

FEC data through Jul 15, 2026. Covering the 2026 two-year cycle only.

Every stored cycle for Robert Wittman is on their legislator profile →

The 2026 cycle at a glance

Total receipts
$4,053,142
Everything the campaign took in
Individual contributions
$1,442,543
Itemized and unitemized split not reported
PAC and other committees
$1,169,350
Received from political committees
Campaign spending
$1,136,232
Total disbursements
Cash on hand
$4,292,789
At the end of the reporting period

Where the money came from

These categories divide total receipts of $4,053,142 exactly once, so they add back up to the reported total.

Receipts by funding category for the 2026 cycle
SourceAmountShare of receipts
Individual contributions$1,442,54335.6%
PAC and other committee contributions$1,169,35028.9%
Party committee contributions$00.0%
Candidate self-funding$00.0%
Loans$00.0%
Other receipts, including transfers$1,441,24935.6%
Total receipts$4,053,142100%

Financial position

Cash, debt, refunds, loans, and transfers as reported through Jul 15, 2026 for the 2026 cycle. These are factual reported values, not a judgement about whether a campaign is healthy, viable, or strong. Independent expenditures are never added to or subtracted from any of them: that money was never the campaign's.

Reported financial position for the 2026 cycle
MeasureAmount
Cash on hand at coverage end$4,292,789
Debts and obligations owed by the committee$0
Debts and obligations owed to the committeeNot reported
Contributions refunded to individuals$20,659
Contributions refunded to committees$0
Transfers received from other authorized committeesAlready raised money moving between the candidate's own committees, not new fundraising.$1,347,520
Transfers made to other authorized committees$0
Repayments of candidate loans$0
Repayments of other loans$0

Calculated from the reported values

Each row below is arithmetic MyRepTracker performed on the values above. Where the FEC published the figure itself, the row says so and no calculation was made.

Values calculated from the reported financial position, with the formula for each
MeasureAmountHow it was produced
Contributions net of refunds$2,591,234Calculated as individual + committee + party + candidate contributions, minus contributions refunded to individuals and committees.
Operating expenditures net of offsetsNot reportedAn input this calculation needs is not published by the source behind this record.
Outstanding candidate loans$0Calculated as loans received from the candidate minus repayments of those loans.
Other outstanding loans$0Calculated as other loans received minus repayments of those loans.
Total contributions refunded$20,659Calculated as refunds to individuals plus refunds to committees.

Change since the previous filing

Both columns come from committee C00441014, so the two periods are comparable. A change is the difference between what Q2 2026 reported and what 12P 2026 reported, and the direction is stated in words rather than shown only as a sign. Q2 2026 reported through Jun 30, 2026 and 12P 2026 through Jul 15, 2026.

Financial position at the two most recent controlling filings of committee C00441014
MeasureQ2 2026Reported through Jun 30, 202612P 2026Reported through Jul 15, 2026Change
Cash on hand at period end$4,269,831$4,292,789Up $22,959
Debts owed by the committee$0$0No change
Contribution refunds in the period$3,610$15Down $3,595

Cash compared with one period's spending

Cash on hand of $4,292,789 set beside the $13,993 this campaign spent during 12P 2026, through Jul 15, 2026, which is 306.8 times that period's spending. This is a ratio between two reported numbers over one named period. It is not a forecast of how long the money will last, and campaigns do not spend evenly across a cycle.

Outside spending

Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with the campaign. This money was never received or controlled by Robert Wittman. Supporting and opposing spending are kept apart rather than combined into one number, and neither is added to campaign receipts.

Spent supporting

$0
Independent expenditures in the 2026 cycle

Spent opposing

$2,044,017
Independent expenditures in the 2026 cycle

What the money was spent on

These categories divide $1,103,331 of itemized spending across 454 transactions, through Jul 15, 2026. That subtotal covers the FEC's published operating-expenditure records, which do not include transfers, loan repayments, refunds, or contributions the campaign made, and is 97.1% of the $1,136,232 in total disbursements reported for the 2026 cycle. Every share below is a share of that subtotal and never of total spending. Purposes were classified under taxonomy spend-1.3.

The difference between that subtotal and total disbursements is spending reported without itemization, which cannot be categorized.

Itemized spending by reported purpose for the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
PurposeAmount% ShareTransactions
Fundraising and solicitation $675,68861.2%94
Unclassified filing descriptions Spending whose reported purpose could not be placed in the taxonomy. It is counted, not guessed at. $183,04916.6%203
Consulting, type not specified $89,7738.1%21
Administration, salary, and overhead $60,5765.5%86
Legal, accounting, and compliance $44,3664.0%25
Events $25,4702.3%11
Travel $6,9070.6%8
Technology and digital services $6,7280.6%1
Campaign materials $5,7730.5%4
Advertising and media $5,0000.5%1
Classified$920,28383.4%
Unclassified filing descriptions$183,04916.6%
Itemized spending categorized here$1,103,331100%454

Political committees that contributed directly

Money received by the authorized campaign committee from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.

This total will usually differ from the PAC figure in the summary above. The summary is what the campaign reported receiving in total; this ranking adds up the individual contributions that were itemized, which is a different record made at a different time. Neither is a correction of the other, and the gap is not an error in either one.

Top 5 of 263 shown $1,238,250 total · $68,000 shown here

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Political committees ranked by direct contributions
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00040998$15,0001.2%3Jun 24, 2026
2BAE SYSTEMS INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (BAE SYSTEMS USA PAC) C00281212$15,0001.2%3Jan 28, 2026
3AIRBUS AMERICAS, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00421230$13,5001.1%3Jan 30, 2026
4SEAL PAC SUPPORTING ELECTING AMERICAN LEADERS PAC C00570226$12,5001.0%5Dec 4, 2025
5SIX PAC C00770255$12,0001.0%5Jun 25, 2026
Show the complete list of 263 committees →

Organizations spending independently

Supporting Robert Wittman

No supporting independent expenditures are reported for this cycle.

Opposing Robert Wittman

All 2 shown $2,044,017 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Organizations ranked by independent spending opposing this candidate
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1YOUR COMMUNITY PAC C00886614$1,215,77959.5%4Aug 31, 2026
2LCV Victory Fund C00486845$828,23840.5%15Aug 13, 2026

What that outside spending purchased

Each independent expenditure carries a short description the spending committee wrote, and these categories are those descriptions sorted under taxonomy outside-1.0. Spending supporting Robert Wittman and spending opposing them are broken down separately and never combined, and every share below is a share of that one direction's total.

The largest category is usually "Advertising, medium not specified". That is not a leftover: it is spending the committee described only as a media buy or as advertising, without saying whether it aired on television, ran online, or arrived in the mail. MyRepTracker reports what was filed rather than assigning it a medium.

Supporting Robert Wittman

No independent expenditures in this direction are reported for this cycle.

Opposing Robert Wittman

Independent spending opposing this candidate, by reported purpose for the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
PurposeAmount% ShareTransactions
Advertising, medium not specified Reported as a media buy or as advertising, with no medium named. $1,078,09552.7%10
Broadcast, cable, and radio advertising $965,77947.2%3
Staff, administration, and overhead $1430.0%6
Classified$2,044,017100.0%
Unclassified filing descriptions$00.0%
Total independent spending$2,044,017100%19

Fundraising channels

Some money arrives through a committee that raised or collected it rather than from a committee that decided to give it. Those committees are listed here instead of among the political committees that contributed, because calling a payment processor or a shared fundraising account a donor would say something the filings do not. None of this is added to, or subtracted from, any total above.

Conduits

A conduit forwards contributions that individuals earmarked for a named candidate. The amounts below come from the receiving campaign's conduit memo records and remain part of its reported individual-contribution total; they are not added to receipts again. MyRepTracker groups only memos carrying a registered conduit committee's FEC ID and does not decode or store contributor names, addresses, employers, occupations, or memo text. The record count is a count of FEC memo records, not donors.

Conduit records shown through Jul 15, 2026 · fetched Sep 8, 2026.

All 2 shown $0 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Registered conduits ranked by individuals' earmarked contributions routed through them
RankCommitteeAmountShareFEC memo recordsLast activity
1WINRED C00694323$0Not available16Jun 29, 2026
2AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00797670$0Not available2May 27, 2026

Who the committees behind this money were

Every committee here is placed by the registration it filed with the FEC for the 2026 cycle: its designation, its committee type, and the organizational form it reported. That is the FEC's own record and involves no judgement by MyRepTracker, so this covers every itemized dollar. A committee's registration can change between cycles, and each cycle is judged by its own.

Contributed to Robert Wittman

Committees itemized $1,238,250 in contributions to this campaign.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Corporate PACs $648,50052.4%128217
Trade association PACs $162,50013.1%4271
Leadership PACs $153,00012.4%3147
Non-connected committees $133,25010.8%2462
Membership organization PACs $58,0004.7%1525
Other candidates' committees $33,5002.7%1318
Labor union PACs $27,0002.2%714
Corporations without capital stock $22,5001.8%39
Itemized total for this direction$1,238,250

Spent opposing Robert Wittman

Committees itemized $2,044,017 in independent spending opposing Robert Wittman.

Independent spenders opposing this candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Non-connected committees $2,044,017100.0%219
Itemized total for this direction$2,044,017

What interests those committees advance

The FEC publishes no industry or interest field, so unlike the section above this one is a claim MyRepTracker makes. A committee is placed here only when there is a document behind the claim that a reader can open: its own statement of organization, its own published mission statement, or a named third party. Every assignment carries that document on the committee's own page. A committee's name is never evidence of anything.

Categorized is not the same as reviewed. Most of these sectors were assigned by machine from the committee's own filing rather than read by a person. Each committee's own page says which of the two its assignment is, and names the document behind it either way.

Coverage is partial on purpose, and the part that is not covered is shown at full size rather than left out. Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees are excluded outright: their giving is an officeholder's or a party's decision, so no interest label describes it. Categories are taxonomy interest-1.7.

Contributed to Robert Wittman

Committees itemized $1,238,250 in contributions to this campaign. $186,500 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $1,051,750, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $657,000 and committees not yet categorized account for $394,750.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Defense Defense $208,00019.8%3065
Technology Communications and technology $91,0008.7%1933
Air transport Transportation $41,0003.9%614
Construction Construction $39,0003.7%915
Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate $28,5002.7%812
Automotive Transportation $28,0002.7%48
Commercial banking Finance, insurance, and real estate $28,0002.7%914
Securities and investment Finance, insurance, and real estate $19,5001.9%59
Physicians and medical specialties Health $19,0001.8%35
Electric utilities Energy and natural resources $18,0001.7%37
Mining Energy and natural resources $17,5001.7%25
Telecommunications Communications and technology $17,5001.7%68
Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate $15,0001.4%47
Transportation unions Labor $15,0001.4%38
Public sector unions Labor $14,5001.4%210
Food and beverage Agriculture $12,0001.1%36
Oil and gas Energy and natural resources $12,0001.1%36
Accounting Professional services $10,0001.0%13
Pharmaceuticals Health $6,0000.6%33
Pro-Israel Ideological and single-issue $6,0000.6%13
Agribusiness Agriculture $5,0000.5%11
Media and entertainment Communications and technology $2,5000.2%11
Credit unions Finance, insurance, and real estate $1,0000.1%11
Hospitals and nursing homes Health $1,0000.1%11
Lawyers and law firms Professional services $1,0000.1%11
Trucking Transportation $1,0000.1%11
Committees not yet categorized $394,75037.5%89151
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. $186,500Not applicable4465
Base the shares are taken over$1,051,750100%
Itemized total for this direction$1,238,250

Spent opposing Robert Wittman

Committees itemized $2,044,017 in independent spending opposing Robert Wittman. Of that, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $2,044,017 and committees not yet categorized account for $0.

Independent spenders opposing this candidate, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue $1,215,77959.5%14
Environmental advocacy Ideological and single-issue $828,23840.5%115
Base the shares are taken over$2,044,017100%
Itemized total for this direction$2,044,017

Last-minute contributions reported before an election

In the days just before an election, a campaign must tell the FEC within 48 hours about any contribution or loan of $1,000 or more. These notices arrive faster than the regular reporting schedule, and the same money is reported again in the report covering those days. Nothing here is added to receipts: it is a preview of money the ordinary reports will carry, not money beside them.

No Form 6 notices were found for the 2026 cycle. Notices are only required in the 20 days before an election, so none is the usual state outside that window.

Where the individual money was reported from

Contributions from individuals that the campaign itemized, grouped by the state each contributor gave as their address. Contributions of $200 or less in aggregate are not itemized and carry no address, so they are not here at all. These places account for $1,467,997 of the $2,790,063 this campaign reported from individuals and from transfers by its other authorized committees, across 1,642 itemized contributions.

From Virginia

$899,219
61.3% of the itemized money that has a place

From everywhere else

$567,278
38.7% of the itemized money that has a place

Money from outside Virginia is not money from outside the country, and neither figure is evidence that anything unlawful happened. People may contribute to campaigns in states they do not live in, and United States citizens living abroad may contribute at all.

What kind of place it came from

Itemized individual contributions by kind of place, 2026 cycle
Kind of placeAmountContributionsShare
States and the District of ColumbiaContributors who gave an address in one of the fifty states or the District of Columbia.$1,454,9971,63499.2%
United States territoriesPuerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands.$11,50060.8%
Not placedContributions the FEC could not attribute to a place. They are reported here and are never assigned to a state or counted in the in-state and out-of-state split.$1,5002Not counted

Places, largest first

Top 10 of 46 places shown as bars. Every place is in the table below.

  • Virginia this campaign's state $899,219
  • Florida $104,371
  • Texas $89,735
  • District of Columbia $64,666
  • California $55,672
  • Maryland $51,751
  • New York $34,503
  • North Carolina $19,320
  • Alabama $16,286
  • Connecticut $15,500
Every place with itemized individual contributions reported for the 2026 cycle
PlaceAmountContributionsShare
Virginia this campaign's state$899,2191,08361.3%
Florida$104,3711187.1%
Texas$89,735596.1%
District of Columbia$64,666884.4%
California$55,672513.8%
Maryland$51,751433.5%
New York$34,503232.4%
North Carolina$19,320201.3%
Alabama$16,286111.1%
Connecticut$15,50091.1%
Pennsylvania$10,500110.7%
Puerto Rico$10,50040.7%
Nevada$9,50080.6%
Massachusetts$8,00050.5%
Washington$7,00030.5%
Georgia$6,750120.5%
Colorado$6,50580.4%
Tennessee$5,750120.4%
South Carolina$5,02060.3%
Wisconsin$5,00030.3%
Oklahoma$4,50040.3%
Ohio$4,03090.3%
Kentucky$4,00060.3%
Michigan$4,00050.3%
Minnesota$3,50010.2%
Utah$3,00030.2%
Missouri$2,50050.2%
New Hampshire$2,50010.2%
Arkansas$1,50030.1%
Not reported not placed$1,5002Not counted
Guam$1,00020.1%
Idaho$1,00020.1%
Illinois$1,00020.1%
Louisiana$1,00020.1%
Montana$1,00020.1%
New Mexico$1,00020.1%
New Jersey$80030.1%
Arizona$75530.1%
Alaska$5001<0.1%
Hawaii$5001<0.1%
Iowa$5001<0.1%
Nebraska$5001<0.1%
Oregon$5001<0.1%
South Dakota$5001<0.1%
Vermont$5001<0.1%
Indiana$3641<0.1%
Reported with a place$1,466,4971,640100%

Contributions are transactions, not people: one contributor giving every month is counted once for each contribution. No contributor's name, address, employer, or occupation is stored or shown anywhere on this site.

  • $1,500 could not be attributed to a place and is left out of the in-state and out-of-state figures rather than assigned to a state.

How this compares

Compared with U.S. House campaigns in Virginia, 2026 cycle: 96 campaigns with a complete Federal Election Commission record for the cycle. This is a position in that group, not a score, a grade, or a judgement about the campaign.

Total receipts

Everything the authorized campaign committee took in for this cycle, including contributions, loans, and transfers.

  • This campaign $4,053,142
  • Cohort median $86,817
Total receipts for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Virginia, 2026 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$4,053,142
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$16,897
Median$86,817
75th percentile$392,454
Highest in the cohort$12,355,664
Campaigns counted96

92 of the 96 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 96th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Share of receipts from political committees

Direct contributions from PACs and other political committees as a share of total receipts. Campaigns reporting no receipts at all have no share and are left out of this measure.

  • This campaign 28.9%
  • Cohort median 0.0%
Share of receipts from political committees for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Virginia, 2026 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign28.9%
Lowest in the cohort0.0%
25th percentile0.0%
Median0.0%
75th percentile4.8%
Highest in the cohort95.1%
Campaigns counted92

84 of the 92 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 91th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Cash on hand

The balance reported at the end of the coverage period. Campaigns report at different times, so this compares balances as of each campaign's own coverage end.

  • This campaign $4,292,789
  • Cohort median $5,042
Cash on hand for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Virginia, 2026 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$4,292,789
Lowest in the cohort-$909
25th percentile$0
Median$5,042
75th percentile$78,690
Highest in the cohort$6,573,093
Campaigns counted96

94 of the 96 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 98th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending supporting

Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate. This money was never received or controlled by the campaign.

  • This campaign $0
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending supporting for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Virginia, 2026 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$0
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$1,012,792
Campaigns counted96

0 of the 96 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 0th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending opposing

Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.

  • This campaign $2,044,017
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending opposing for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Virginia, 2026 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$2,044,017
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$2,044,017
Campaigns counted96

95 of the 96 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 99th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Every comparison is drawn from one two-year cycle and one office. Only campaigns whose FEC record for that cycle is complete are counted; the rest are reported beside the cohort and are never counted as zero. One authorized committee is counted once however many candidacies report it, so where a candidate's committees are all reported by another FEC record, that record supplies the figures for both. A campaign is never compared with another cycle, with a career total, or with a candidate for a different office.

What these numbers mean

Receipts are not the same as contributions
Total receipts include everything the campaign took in, such as contributions, loans, and transfers. Contributions are only the money given by people and committees.
Direct contributions are not outside spending
A direct contribution is money received by the campaign's own authorized committee. An independent expenditure is money another organization spent on its own, without coordinating with the campaign. The Federal Election Commission treats these as different activities, and so does this page.
The organizations named here are political committees
Direct rankings count what one political committee gave to a campaign; outside-spending rankings count what a committee spent independently. A separate conduit section groups individual contributions only when the campaign's memo record supplies a registered conduit committee's FEC ID. It never attributes donors to employers or interest groups, and it never exposes contributor names. Sites using broader attribution rules may therefore report different organization totals.
A cycle may be only partly reported
Filings arrive throughout a two-year cycle. A current cycle shows only what has been filed and processed through the coverage date shown above, so it is not comparable with a finished cycle.
This view is cycle specific
It covers the 2026 two-year cycle only.

Source: Federal Election Commission ↗. MyRepTracker ingests FEC records directly and does not add its own influence, risk, or corruption score.