Law-enforcement officers; restrictions on wearing of facial coverings, exceptions, penalty.
Summary
Law-enforcement officers; restrictions on wearing of facial coverings; exceptions; penalty. Prohibits any law-enforcement officer, defined in the bill, from wearing a facial covering, defined in the bill, while engaged in the performance of his official duties. The bill sets out several exceptions to such prohibition, including protective facial coverings to protect against disease, infection, and exposure to toxic substances and facial coverings worn by any law-enforcement officer assigned to a special weapons and tactics team while engaged in the performance of his official duties with such team. The bill subjects the law-enforcement officer to disciplinary action, including dismissal, demotion, suspension, transfer, or decertification, and creates a Class 1 misdemeanor for any law-enforcement officer who wears a facial covering in violation of the provisions of the bill unless the law-enforcement agency that employs such law-enforcement officer has adopted and established a written policy for and restrictions on the use of facial coverings. The bill also directs the Department of Criminal Justice Services to develop a model policy for and restrictions on the use of facial coverings by law-enforcement officers. This bill is identical to HB 1482.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
House of Delegates Passage
Mar 2026
Vetoed
Apr 2026
Introduced Jan 13, 2026
Vetoed Apr 12, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
Public Safety Substitute
→
Governor Substitute
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was amended from a House Substitute to a Governor Substitute, which significantly narrowed the scope of liability. The original version applied to all law-enforcement officers, but the new version restricts the civil lawsuit provision to only federal law-enforcement officers. Additionally, the bill's purpose was expanded to include amending and reenacting § 9.1-102, which governs the powers and duties of the Board and Department of State Police.
Scope change
The bill's scope was narrowed regarding liability; it now only applies to federal law-enforcement officers instead of all law-enforcement officers, and the bill now includes amendments to the Department of State Police regulations.
ELIGIBILITY
The definition of 'law-enforcement officer' eligible to be sued was changed from all officers to specifically 'federal law-enforcement officer'.
REQUIREMENT
The bill text was expanded to include amendments and reenactment of § 9.1-102 regarding the Department of State Police.
TECHNICAL
The document header was changed from 'HOUSE SUBSTITUTE' to 'SENATE SUBSTITUTE' and the date was updated to April 12, 2026.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 5, 2026 · House of Delegates Mar 4, 2026
How they voted
39–0
Passed
Total votes 39
Feb 5, 2026
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican19
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
47
Key actions
13
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Apr 12, 2026
Vetoed
Governor's recommendation received by Senate
executive
Mar 31, 2026
Lower · Passed
Signed by Speaker
lower
Mar 30, 2026
Upper · Passed
Signed by President
upper
Mar 30, 2026
Upper · Passed
Bill text as passed Senate and House (SB352ER)
upper
Mar 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
Conference report agreed to by House (62-Y 35-N 0-A)
lower
Mar 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
Conference report agreed to by Senate (21-Y 18-N 0-A)
upper
Mar 13, 2026
Legislature · Passed
Conference Report released
legislature
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
House requested conference committee
lower
Mar 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
Passed House with substitute (64-Y 35-N 0-A)
lower
Feb 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported from Public Safety with substitute (15-Y 7-N)
lower
Feb 12, 2026
Committee
Referred to Committee on Public Safety
lower
Feb 9, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time and passed Senate (21-Y 19-N 0-A)
upper
Feb 6, 2026
Amended
Courts of Justice Amendments rejected
upper
Feb 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed by for the day (Voice Vote)
upper
Feb 4, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported from Finance and Appropriations with substitute (10-Y 5-N)
upper
Jan 28, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported from Courts of Justice with amendments and rereferred to Finance and Appropriations (9-Y 5-N)
upper
Jan 28, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate committee offered
upper
Jan 13, 2026
Committee
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
upper
1 primary · 8 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 352
Scope: VA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 352. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline