Siting of battery energy storage projects; commercial solar photovoltaic generation facilities, etc.
Summary
Siting of battery energy storage projects; commercial solar photovoltaic generation facilities; permitted accessory use. Deems battery energy storage projects as a permitted accessory use in all zoning districts on any parcel of land that is subject to an approved special exception, as defined in the bill, for a commercial solar photovoltaic generation facility, if such battery energy storage project is located within the boundaries of the parcel covered by the existing special exception and complies with any applicable federal, state, and local safety or fire codes and environmental regulations. The bill prohibits a host locality from requiring a special exception or any other local land use approval on such battery energy storage project. The bill clarifies that nothing in the provisions of the bill shall be construed to (i) limit the authority of a host locality to enforce compliance with applicable codes or ensure the safe operation of the battery energy storage project or (ii) preclude the developer of a battery energy storage project from negotiating a siting agreement with the host locality. The bill also clarifies that any battery energy storage project for which an initial interconnection request has been filed with an electric utility or a regional transmission organization prior to July 1, 2030, and is constructed in accordance with the provisions of the bill shall be subject to the applicable local ordinance and regulation in effect on July 1, 2026. This bill is identical to SB 443.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
House of Delegates Passage
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
Vetoed
Apr 2026
Introduced Jan 13, 2026
Vetoed Apr 12, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
Governor Substitute
→
Enrolled
·
3 edits
·
Mar 12, 2026
MINOR
The bill was finalized as an Enrolled Act, expanding its scope to amend an additional section (15.2-2316.7) regarding siting negotiations. The most significant policy change removes a specific limit on battery storage size, allowing projects up to 100% of a solar facility's capacity to be built as permitted accessory uses without needing new local approvals. A minor formatting adjustment was made to clarify that developers can negotiate siting agreements with host localities.
Scope change
The bill's scope was expanded to include amendments to § 15.2-2316.7, which governs the negotiation process for siting agreements between solar project applicants and host localities.
SCOPE
Added amendments to § 15.2-2316.7 to formalize the requirement for applicants to negotiate siting agreements with host localities.
ELIGIBILITY
Removed the 100% capacity threshold for battery energy storage projects, allowing them to be permitted accessory uses regardless of size as long as they are on the same parcel as an approved solar project.
REQUIREMENT
Clarified that developers can negotiate siting agreements with host localities, removing the previous reference to the 'developer or host locality' as a single entity in that context.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 3, 2026 · House of Delegates Feb 5, 2026
How they voted
39–0
Passed
Total votes 39
Mar 3, 2026
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican19
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
7
Committee
5
Apr 12, 2026
Vetoed
Governor's recommendation received by House
executive
Mar 12, 2026
Lower · Passed
Signed by Speaker
lower
Mar 11, 2026
Upper · Passed
Signed by President
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed Senate (27-Y 11-N 1-A)
upper
Mar 3, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed by for the day Block Vote (Voice Vote)
upper
Mar 2, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported from Local Government (11-Y 4-N)
upper
Feb 6, 2026
Committee
Referred to Committee on Local Government
upper
Feb 5, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time and passed House (70-Y 28-N 0-A)
lower
Jan 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported from Counties, Cities and Towns (17-Y 4-N)
lower
Jan 28, 2026
Committee
Assigned HCCT sub: Subcommittee #1
lower
Jan 13, 2026
Committee
Referred to Committee on Counties, Cities and Towns
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Irene Shin
DDemocratic
Co
Michelle Maldonado
DDemocratic
Co
Shelly Simonds
DDemocratic
Co
Terry Kilgore
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 891
Scope: VA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 891. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline