Health insurance; pharmacies, freedom of choice, delivery of prescription drugs, penalties.
Summary
Health insurance; pharmacies; freedom of choice; delivery of prescription drugs; penalties. Prohibits an insurer, health maintenance organization, corporation providing preferred provider subscription contracts, or pharmacy benefits manager from imposing upon any person receiving pharmaceutical benefits any policy or practice requiring or incentivizing certain provisions relating to the delivery of prescription drugs. A violation of the bill's provisions constitutes an unfair trade practice under existing law and is subject to injunctive, penalty, and enforcement provisions in existing law.
Bill status
in committee
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Feb 2026
House of Delegates Passage
Feb 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 21, 2026
Last action Feb 13, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Labor and Commerce Substitute
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended from its original introduction to a committee substitute version, which includes significant substantive policy changes alongside formatting updates. The most critical change is the addition of a new subsection (G) prohibiting insurers from penalizing or retaliating against pharmacies for exercising their rights under the bill. Additionally, the definition of eligible providers was expanded to include physician practices, hospital outpatient infusion centers, and other clinical settings, broadening the scope of who can dispense drugs under this freedom of choice mandate.
Scope change
The bill's scope was expanded to explicitly include physician practices, hospital outpatient infusion centers, and other clinical settings as eligible providers who can dispense prescription drugs, in addition to traditional pharmacies. This change ensures that patients can receive their medications at a wider variety of healthcare locations.
ENFORCEMENT
Added a new provision explicitly prohibiting insurers from penalizing, terminating, or retaliating against pharmacies or dispensing practitioners for exercising their rights under the bill.
DEFINITION
Expanded the definition of eligible providers to include physician practices, hospital outpatient infusion centers, and other clinical settings that dispense or administer drugs, medicines, or medicinal chemicals.
TECHNICAL
Updated the bill header to reflect that it is now an 'Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute' proposed by the House Committee on Labor and Commerce, dated February 3, 2026.
Replaced the original 'Introduced' status and date (January 21, 2026) with the new substitute status and date (February 3, 2026).
Floor votes · House of Delegates Feb 5, 2026
How they voted
22–0
Passed
Total votes 22
Feb 5, 2026
D
Democratic15
100% Yea
R
Republican7
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Feb 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
Subcommittee recommends continuing to (Voice Vote)
lower
Feb 5, 2026
Committee
Assigned HAPP sub: Compensation and Retirement
lower
Feb 5, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported from Labor and Commerce with substitute and referred to Appropriations (22-Y 0-N)
lower
Feb 5, 2026
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (22-0)
house of delegates
Feb 3, 2026
Lower · Passed
House subcommittee offered
lower
Jan 27, 2026
Committee
Assigned HCL sub: Subcommittee #1
lower
Jan 21, 2026
Committee
Referred to Committee on Labor and Commerce
lower
Jan 21, 2026
Introduced
Presented and ordered printed 26104543D
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jeion Ward
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1390
Scope: VA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1390. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline