Use of profane, threatening, etc., language over the telephone; repeated telephone contact, penalty.
Summary
Use of profane, threatening, etc., language over the telephone; repeated telephone contact; penalty. Creates a Class 6 felony for any person who uses obscene, vulgar, profane, lewd, lascivious, or indecent language, or makes any suggestion or proposal of an obscene nature, or threatens any illegal or immoral act with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass any person, over any telephone to (i) the same person 50 or more times within a 48-hour period or (ii) two or more family or household members of a person 50 or more times within a 48-hour period.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 9, 2025
Last action Jan 27, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Courts of Justice Substitute Offered
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended from its original introduction to a substitute version offered by the Senate Committee for Courts of Justice. The substantive policy content of the bill remains largely the same, but the formatting and structure were significantly altered to conform to committee substitute standards. A new definition for 'robocall' was added, and a new presumption was established that robocalls used to violate the statute are made with intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains focused on telephone harassment and profanity, but the addition of a 'robocall' definition and rebuttable presumption expands the enforcement mechanism by making it easier to prove intent in cases involving automated calls.
DEFINITION
Added a new definition for 'robocall' as an automated phone call using a computerized auto dialer and prerecorded message.
ENFORCEMENT
Added a rebuttable presumption that robocalls used to violate the statute are made with intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass, making it easier to prosecute such cases.
TECHNICAL
Reorganized the bill structure to include committee substitute formatting, including line numbers and section headers.
FISCAL
Changed the fiscal impact language to leave blank fields for appropriation amounts, indicating the specific funding amounts were not yet determined at this stage.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
5
Key actions
0
Committee
1
Jan 9, 2025
Committee
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tammy Mulchi
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1298
Scope: VA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1298. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline