Limitation of prosecutions; false entries or destruction of records by officers.
Summary
Limitation of prosecutions; false entries or destruction of records by officers. Extends the statute of limitations for prosecution of the offense of false entries or destruction of records by officers to within (i) five years of the commission of the offense or (ii) two years after the existence of the illegal act and the identity of the offender are discovered by the Commonwealth, whichever is later. The current statute of limitations is one year from the date of the offense.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 8, 2025
Last action Feb 4, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
HCJ Sub: Criminal Substitute
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was amended from an introduced version to a substitute version by the House Committee for Courts of Justice. The primary substantive change is the addition of § 18.2-472, which defines the crime of false entries or destruction of records by public officers as a Class 1 misdemeanor. The scope of the bill was expanded to include amendments to both § 18.2-472 and § 19.2-8, whereas the original bill only addressed § 19.2-8. All other content regarding limitation of prosecutions for various offenses remains unchanged.
Scope change
The bill's scope was expanded to include amendments to § 18.2-472 (false entries or destruction of records by officers) in addition to the original § 19.2-8 (limitation of prosecutions).
REQUIREMENT
Added § 18.2-472, which establishes that clerks, public officers, or employees who fraudulently make false entries, erase, alter, secrete, or destroy official records commit a Class 1 misdemeanor and forfeit their office or employment.
SCOPE
The bill now amends two code sections (§§ 18.2-472 and 19.2-8) instead of one (§ 19.2-8), expanding the legislative changes to include criminal penalties for record falsification by public officers.
TECHNICAL
The document format changed from an introduced bill to a substitute amendment with committee markup, including page numbers and draft headers, but the substantive text of § 19.2-8 remained identical.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
5
Key actions
1
Committee
3
Jan 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
Subcommittee recommends laying on the table (5-Y 3-N)
lower
Jan 21, 2025
Committee
Assigned Courts sub: Criminal
lower
Jan 8, 2025
Committee
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mark Earley
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 2347
Scope: VA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 2347. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline