Artificial intelligence-based tool; definition, use of tool.

Title and section heading were modified to specify 'for criminal justice purpose' instead of general use.

Added a new definition for 'criminal justice purpose' covering pretrial detention, prosecution, adjudication, probation, parole, correctional supervision, and rehabilitation.

Definition of 'artificial intelligence-based tool' was modified to specify 'software systems' and explicitly state tools are used to inform criminal justice decisions.

Modified the requirement language to state AI recommendations cannot be the sole basis for decisions but may inform final human decisions, replacing the original absolute prohibition.

The requirement for human involvement in AI-based decisions was clarified by changing 'solely on the basis of a recommendation' to 'without the involvement of a human decision-maker'.

Formatting and spacing changes were made to align with reenrollment standards, including line breaks and header formatting.

The definition of 'artificial intelligence-based tools' was simplified by removing the specific mention of 'decision support systems' from the list of examples.

The separate definition for 'human oversight' was removed from the enrolled version, as the concept was integrated into the main section text.

The list of criminal justice decisions affected by the AI tool restrictions was expanded to include prosecution, adjudication, correctional supervision, and rehabilitation, in addition to pretrial release, sentencing, probation, and parole.

The requirement for human oversight was modified to state that no decision shall be made solely on AI recommendations, with added language allowing for legal challenges to the use of such tools.

The bill was reduced from two sections (19.2-11.14 and 19.2-11.15) to a single section (19.2-11.14), and the chapter title was changed from 'Criminal Justice Risk Assessments' to 'Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools'.