
Campaign finance
FEC data through Jun 30, 2025. Covering the 2026 two-year cycle only.
Possibly out of date. last refreshed 2026-08-20
Compare cycles
Each column is one cycle through its own coverage date. The active cycle is still accumulating activity; closed cycles are historical records. No percentage change is calculated between unequal reporting windows. Outside spending is separated from campaign activity because it was never received or controlled by the campaign.
| Measure | 2026 active cycle Through Jun 30, 2025 Cycle-to-date, not final Possibly out of date: last refreshed 2026-08-20 | 2024 closed cycle Through Dec 31, 2024 | 2022 closed cycle Through Dec 31, 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Money received | |||
| Total receipts | $8,350 | $174,791 | $3,822,924 |
| Individuals | $00.0% of receipts | $9620.6% of receipts | $2,623,36068.6% of receipts |
| PACs and other committees | $7,34488.0% of receipts | $00.0% of receipts | $677,21717.7% of receipts |
| Campaign activity | |||
| Campaign spending | $622,821 | $4,010,979 | $1,890,659 |
| Cash on hand | $0 | $614,470 | $4,450,658 |
| Debt owed | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Contribution refunds | $188,317 | $785,903 | $41,928 |
| Independent spending: not campaign money | |||
| Outside support | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Outside opposition | $0 | $0 | $0 |
The 2026 cycle at a glance
Where the money came from
These categories divide total receipts of $8,350 exactly once, so they add back up to the reported total.
| Source | Amount | Share of receipts |
|---|---|---|
| Individual contributions | $0 | 0.0% |
| PAC and other committee contributions | $7,344 | 88.0% |
| Party committee contributions | $0 | 0.0% |
| Candidate self-funding | $0 | 0.0% |
| Loans | $0 | 0.0% |
| Other receipts, including transfers | $1,006 | 12.0% |
| Total receipts | $8,350 | 100% |
Self-funding, loans, and cash
Reported factual values. They are not a judgement about how strong or healthy a campaign is.
| Measure | Amount |
|---|---|
| Candidate self-funding | $0 |
| Candidate loans | $0 |
| Other loans | $0 |
| Party committee contributions | $0 |
| Cash on hand at coverage end | $0 |
Financial position
Cash, debt, refunds, loans, and transfers as reported through Jun 30, 2025 for the 2026 cycle. These are factual reported values, not a judgement about whether a campaign is healthy, viable, or strong. Independent expenditures are never added to or subtracted from any of them: that money was never the campaign's.
| Measure | Amount |
|---|---|
| Cash on hand at coverage end | $0 |
| Debts and obligations owed by the committee | $0 |
| Debts and obligations owed to the committee | Not reported |
| Contributions refunded to individuals | $152,287 |
| Contributions refunded to committees | $36,030 |
| Transfers received from other authorized committeesAlready raised money moving between the candidate's own committees, not new fundraising. | $0 |
| Transfers made to other authorized committees | $0 |
| Repayments of candidate loans | $0 |
| Repayments of other loans | $0 |
Calculated from the reported values
Each row below is arithmetic MyRepTracker performed on the values above. Where the FEC published the figure itself, the row says so and no calculation was made.
| Measure | Amount | How it was produced |
|---|---|---|
| Contributions net of refunds | -$180,972 | Calculated as individual + committee + party + candidate contributions, minus contributions refunded to individuals and committees. |
| Operating expenditures net of offsets | Not reported | An input this calculation needs is not published by the source behind this record. |
| Outstanding candidate loans | $0 | Calculated as loans received from the candidate minus repayments of those loans. |
| Other outstanding loans | $0 | Calculated as other loans received minus repayments of those loans. |
| Total contributions refunded | $188,317 | Calculated as refunds to individuals plus refunds to committees. |
Change since the previous filing
Both columns come from committee C00344473, so the two periods are comparable. A change is the difference between what Q1 2025 reported and what TER 2025 reported, and the direction is stated in words rather than shown only as a sign. Q1 2025 reported through Mar 31, 2025 and TER 2025 through Jun 30, 2025.
| Measure | Q1 2025Reported through Mar 31, 2025 | TER 2025Reported through Jun 30, 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash on hand at period end | $444,405 | $0 | Down $444,405 |
| Debts owed by the committee | $0 | $0 | No change |
| Contribution refunds in the period | -$188,317 | $0 | Up $188,317 |
Cash compared with one period's spending
Cash on hand of $0 set beside the $444,526 this campaign spent during TER 2025, through Jun 30, 2025, which is 0.0 times that period's spending. This is a ratio between two reported numbers over one named period. It is not a forecast of how long the money will last, and campaigns do not spend evenly across a cycle.
Outside spending
Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with the campaign. This money was never received or controlled by Debbie Stabenow. Supporting and opposing spending are kept apart rather than combined into one number, and neither is added to campaign receipts.
Spent supporting
Spent opposing
What the money was spent on
Political committees that contributed directly
Money received by the authorized campaign committee from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.
This total will usually differ from the PAC figure in the summary above. The summary is what the campaign reported receiving in total; this ranking adds up the individual contributions that were itemized, which is a different record made at a different time. Neither is a correction of the other, and the gap is not an error in either one.
Filing periods · STABENOW FOR US SENATE
Each row is one filing period as that committee reported it, not a running cycle total. Receipts, spending, and end-of-period cash are drawn on one shared scale, so no bar here uses a different axis from any other. Every row comes from the one filing in force for its period; the filing ledger below lists that filing and any earlier version it replaced.
| Period | Receipts | Spending | Cash at end | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $8,230 | $178,295 | $444,405 | FEC filing ↗ |
| TER 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $121 | $444,526 | $0 | FEC filing ↗ |
Last-minute contributions reported before an election
In the days just before an election, a campaign must tell the FEC within 48 hours about any contribution or loan of $1,000 or more. These notices arrive faster than the regular reporting schedule, and the same money is reported again in the report covering those days. Nothing here is added to receipts: it is a preview of money the ordinary reports will carry, not money beside them.
Where the individual money was reported from
How this compares
Compared with U.S. Senate campaigns nationwide, 2026 cycle: 410 campaigns with a complete Federal Election Commission record for the cycle, out of 419 on file. This is a position in that group, not a score, a grade, or a judgement about the campaign.
Total receipts
Everything the authorized campaign committee took in for this cycle, including contributions, loans, and transfers.
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| This campaign | $8,350 |
| Lowest in the cohort | $0 |
| 25th percentile | $17,760 |
| Median | $216,860 |
| 75th percentile | $2,269,114 |
| Highest in the cohort | $77,279,766 |
| Campaigns counted | 410 |
68 of the 410 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 17th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.
Share of receipts from political committees
Direct contributions from PACs and other political committees as a share of total receipts. Campaigns reporting no receipts at all have no share and are left out of this measure.
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| This campaign | 88.0% |
| Lowest in the cohort | 0.0% |
| 25th percentile | 0.0% |
| Median | 0.4% |
| 75th percentile | 7.0% |
| Highest in the cohort | 88.0% |
| Campaigns counted | 384 |
383 of the 384 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 100th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.
Cash on hand
The balance reported at the end of the coverage period. Campaigns report at different times, so this compares balances as of each campaign's own coverage end.
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| This campaign | $0 |
| Lowest in the cohort | -$16,841 |
| 25th percentile | $356 |
| Median | $14,751 |
| 75th percentile | $1,192,514 |
| Highest in the cohort | $42,587,451 |
| Campaigns counted | 410 |
15 of the 410 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 4th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.
Outside spending supporting
Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate. This money was never received or controlled by the campaign.
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| This campaign | $0 |
| Lowest in the cohort | $0 |
| 25th percentile | $0 |
| Median | $0 |
| 75th percentile | $0 |
| Highest in the cohort | $33,915,827 |
| Campaigns counted | 410 |
0 of the 410 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 0th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.
Outside spending opposing
Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| This campaign | $0 |
| Lowest in the cohort | $0 |
| 25th percentile | $0 |
| Median | $0 |
| 75th percentile | $0 |
| Highest in the cohort | $25,490,183 |
| Campaigns counted | 410 |
0 of the 410 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 0th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.
- 9 of the 419 campaigns on file for this cohort have no complete record for the cycle and are not counted in any figure here.
Every comparison is drawn from one two-year cycle and one office. Only campaigns whose FEC record for that cycle is complete are counted; the rest are reported beside the cohort and are never counted as zero. One authorized committee is counted once however many candidacies report it, so where a candidate's committees are all reported by another FEC record, that record supplies the figures for both. A campaign is never compared with another cycle, with a career total, or with a candidate for a different office.
The committees around this campaign
The Federal Election Commission links several kinds of committee to one candidate, and they are not interchangeable. An authorized campaign committee is the campaign. A joint fundraising committee raises money for several participants at once and passes each a share. A leadership PAC is controlled by the member and is not their campaign at all. Every row below is labelled with the designation the FEC itself filed, and none is inferred from a committee's name.
FEC candidate records
The FEC keys a candidate ID to one office, so a member who has run for more than one holds more than one ID. Each keeps its own committees and its own totals, and this product never merges them into a single record.
| FEC candidate ID | Office | State and district | Cycles with stored data | FEC record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H6MI08163 | House | MI district 8 | None stored | FEC ↗ |
| S8MI00281 | Senate | MI | 2022 through 2026 | FEC ↗ |
Committees the FEC links to those records
| Committee | What it is | Cycles linked | FEC record |
|---|---|---|---|
| STABENOW FOR US SENATE C00344473 | Authorized campaign committee P | 2022 through 2026 | FEC ↗ |
| MICHIGAN VICTORY FUND C00495580 Formerly STABENOW VICTORY FUND | Joint fundraising committee J | 2022 through 2026 | FEC ↗ |
What the records show changing
Each row is something the FEC's own filings state, in the cycle they state it. The FEC's published files carry no registration or termination dates, so these are cycles rather than days, and every row links to the record it came from.
| Cycle | Change | What it means | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Ran for Senate under a new FEC candidate ID | The FEC keys a candidate ID to an office, so the move from House to Senate created S8MI00281 alongside H6MI08163. Both remain valid and each keeps its own committees and totals. | FEC ↗ |
| 2022 | First cycle the FEC links STABENOW FOR US SENATE to this member | The FEC's candidate-committee linkage covers a cycle at a time and carries no registration date, so this is the first cycle the records place the committee with this member rather than the day it registered. | FEC ↗ |
| 2022 | First cycle the FEC links MICHIGAN VICTORY FUND to this member | The FEC's candidate-committee linkage covers a cycle at a time and carries no registration date, so this is the first cycle the records place the committee with this member rather than the day it registered. | FEC ↗ |
| 2024 | Filed as MICHIGAN VICTORY FUND | The previous cycle's registration filed as STABENOW VICTORY FUND. The committee ID is unchanged, so this is one committee under a new name and not a second committee. | FEC ↗ |
Transfers between committees
A transfer moves money that was already raised. When a joint fundraising committee sends a campaign its share, or a campaign shifts a balance between two of its own committees, the money was raised once and is being moved. It is never counted as money raised, here or in any total on this page.
Transfers in, as Debbie Stabenow's own reports state them
Transfers out, as Debbie Stabenow's own reports state them
Both committees file their own record of the same transfer, so the itemized rows below count each one once: 7 transfers, of which 1 was reported by both sides. Counting each filing separately would have added $702 that no one raised twice. These are the committees' own itemized filings and the summary figures above come from a different FEC file; the two routinely differ and neither is a correction of the other.
| Direction | Amount |
|---|---|
| Into one of these committees from elsewhere | $0 |
| Out of one of these committees to elsewhere | $10,376 |
| Between two of these committees | $86,236 |
| Date | From | To | Amount | Reported by | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2025 | MICHIGAN VICTORY FUND C00495580 | GREAT LAKES PAC C00375584 same campaign | $38,556 | One committee | FEC filing ↗ |
| Mar 20, 2025 | MICHIGAN VICTORY FUND C00495580 | GREAT LAKES PAC C00375584 same campaign | $38,556 | One committee | FEC filing ↗ |
| Mar 12, 2025 | MICHIGAN VICTORY FUND C00495580 | GREAT LAKES PAC C00375584 same campaign | $702 | Both committees | FEC filing ↗ |
| Feb 24, 2025 | MICHIGAN VICTORY FUND C00495580 | MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE C00031054 | $5,188 | One committee | FEC filing ↗ |
| Feb 18, 2025 | MICHIGAN VICTORY FUND C00495580 | MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE C00031054 | $5,188 | One committee | FEC filing ↗ |
| Feb 14, 2025 | MICHIGAN VICTORY FUND C00495580 | STABENOW FOR US SENATE C00344473 same campaign | $7,344 | One committee | FEC filing ↗ |
| Jan 9, 2025 | MICHIGAN VICTORY FUND C00495580 | GREAT LAKES PAC C00375584 same campaign | $1,078 | One committee | FEC filing ↗ |
Associated leadership PAC
GREAT LAKES PAC C00375584
This is not Debbie Stabenow's campaign committee. A leadership PAC is a separate committee that a candidate or officeholder establishes to support other candidates. It raises its own money, files its own reports, and gives in its own name. None of the money below is money Debbie Stabenow's campaign raised, and none of it is included in any campaign total on this page.
The FEC's committee record names Debbie Stabenow as the sponsoring candidate or officeholder. This is not their campaign committee.
| Measure | Amount |
|---|---|
| Receipts this committee reported | $45,681 |
| Disbursements this committee reported | $164,894 |
| Cash on hand at the end of its latest report | $655,285 |
| Contributions to candidates | $86,00012 candidates MyRepTracker covers |
Figures cover this committee's filings through Jul 31, 2026. Every candidate this committee reached → · Its filings at the FEC ↗ · Its FEC record ↗
Filings behind these figures
Every amount on this page was reported on a filing. These are those filings. 6 of 6 are in force for the 2026 cycle, and none has been replaced by a later version.
All 6 filings shown
| Filing | Coverage | Filed | Version | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| House or Senate campaign report (Form 3) TERMINATION REPORT 2025 · filing 1897421 STABENOW FOR US SENATE | Apr 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2025 | Jun 29, 2025 | In force | At the FEC ↗ |
| House or Senate campaign report (Form 3) APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 · filing 1887245 STABENOW FOR US SENATE | Jan 1, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025 | Apr 15, 2025 | In force | At the FEC ↗ |
| Committee report (Form 3X) TERMINATION REPORT 2025 · filing 1881533 MICHIGAN VICTORY FUND | Jan 1, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025 | Mar 20, 2025 | In force | At the FEC ↗ |
| Miscellaneous submission (Form 99) no file number published STABENOW FOR US SENATE | No coverage period reported | Aug 5, 2025 | In force | At the FEC ↗ |
| Miscellaneous submission (Form 99) no file number published MICHIGAN VICTORY FUND | No coverage period reported | Mar 25, 2025 | In force | At the FEC ↗ |
| Statement of organization (Form 1) filing 1863761 STABENOW FOR US SENATE | No coverage period reported | Jan 16, 2025 | In force, and itself an amendment amendment 35 | At the FEC ↗ |
Cycles 2022 through 2026
This range has gaps: it covers only the cycles named above rather than every cycle between them. This is not a lifetime total. Campaign finance here is keyed to the FEC records for the offices Debbie Stabenow has held, so money raised for an office they ran for and did not win is not part of it.
| Measure | Amount |
|---|---|
| Total receipts | $4,006,065 |
| Individual contributions | $2,624,321 |
| PAC and other committee contributions | $684,561 |
| Total spending | $6,524,459 |
What these numbers mean
- Receipts are not the same as contributions
- Total receipts include everything the campaign took in, such as contributions, loans, and transfers. Contributions are only the money given by people and committees.
- Direct contributions are not outside spending
- A direct contribution is money received by the campaign's own authorized committee. An independent expenditure is money another organization spent on its own, without coordinating with the campaign. The Federal Election Commission treats these as different activities, and so does this page.
- The organizations named here are political committees
- Direct rankings count what one political committee gave to a campaign; outside-spending rankings count what a committee spent independently. A separate conduit section groups individual contributions only when the campaign's memo record supplies a registered conduit committee's FEC ID. It never attributes donors to employers or interest groups, and it never exposes contributor names. Sites using broader attribution rules may therefore report different organization totals.
- A cycle may be only partly reported
- Filings arrive throughout a two-year cycle. A current cycle shows only what has been filed and processed through the coverage date shown above, so it is not comparable with a finished cycle.
- This view is cycle specific
- It covers the 2026 two-year cycle only. Use the cycle links above to change it; the combined section further up covers several cycles at once.
Source: Federal Election Commission ↗. MyRepTracker ingests FEC records directly and does not add its own influence, risk, or corruption score.