S 1890 United States Senate · 119th Congress

Carla Walker Act

The Carla Walker Act establishes two competitive grant programs to fund forensic DNA analysis and equipment for public law enforcement and medical examiner offices. It provides $5 million annually (2025-2029) for eligible entities like state police, prosecutors' offices, medical examiners, and coroners to purchase equipment or conduct whole-genome sequencing (testing 100,000+ genetic markers) to solve cold cases or identify unknown remains when standard DNA databases fail. Grants cannot cover staffing, travel, or general equipment but require compliance with DOJ’s 2019 forensic genealogy policy and mandate detailed annual reports on case outcomes. The law aims to improve investigative capabilities through specialized forensic genetic genealogy while maintaining strict oversight and reporting requirements.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
May 2025
Committee Review
May 2026
Senate Passage
Jun 2026
House Passage
President
Introduced May 22, 2025 Last action Jun 15, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

Introduced in Senate Engrossed in Senate · 10 edits · Jun 10, 2026
MAJOR
The Senate engrossed version substantially expanded and restructured the forensic genetic genealogy (FGG) grants bill. It added a comprehensive set of privacy and procedural requirements for FGG use (including mandatory CODIS upload before FGG, informed consent for reference samples, and a ban on using profiles to determine disease predisposition), broadened eligible entities to include county law enforcement and prosecutor's offices, expanded grant purposes to cover database searching costs, shifted the funding window from FY2025-2029 to FY2027-2031, and added a no-preemption provision protecting state laws with stronger protections.
REQUIREMENT

New subsection 3062(e) adds 10 specific requirements for FGG use: mandatory CODIS upload before attempting FGG, prohibition on arrest based solely on genetic association, requirement to identify as law enforcement to genealogy services, restriction to services with explicit public notice, informed consent for third-party reference samples (with a narrow exception), confidentiality obligations, limitation of use to identification purposes only, data access controls, compliance with state and federal law for covert collection, and a ban on determining genetic predisposition for disease or psychological traits.

The use-of-grant provisions in 3062(d) removed the qualifier that unidentified human remains must be 'reasonably believed by investigators to be the remains of a suspected homicide victim,' broadening eligibility for FGG testing on unidentified remains. Outsourcing options were expanded to include medical examiner/coroner's offices and prosecutor's offices, while removing the option to outsource to non-accredited labs that merely attest to pursue accreditation (that requirement was moved into the definition).

ENFORCEMENT

New subsection 3062(f) requires the Attorney General to promulgate regulations within 1 year of enactment to promote reasoned exercise of investigative, scientific, and prosecutorial discretion in FGG cases, incorporating the requirements from subsection (e).

SCOPE

New section 3066 provides that nothing in the part preempts state or local laws containing requirements that provide equivalent or greater protection than the federal requirements.

Section 3063 was retitled from 'Grants to purchase forensic equipment' to 'Grants for forensic equipment and database searching,' and the grant purpose was expanded to include funding genealogical database searches, not just equipment purchases. A new compliance subsection requires adherence to the Interim Policy and regulations, with an exception for activities involving unidentified human remains.

ELIGIBILITY

Eligible entities for DNA analysis grants (3062) now include county law enforcement agencies and a new category of 'publicly funded accredited forensic laboratory.' Prosecutor's offices are now qualified as 'State, Tribal, county, or local' rather than just any prosecutor's office. For equipment grants (3063), the accreditation requirement was removed from publicly funded labs and prosecutor's offices were added as eligible.

FISCAL

The funding authorization window for both grant programs shifted from fiscal years 2025 through 2029 to fiscal years 2027 through 2031, delaying the start of funding by two years while maintaining the same $5 million annual amount.

DEFINITION

The definition of 'forensic analysis' was broadened: changed from 'required by' to 'requested by,' added coroner or medical examiner's office as a requester, expanded evidence types to include 'biological evidence,' and expanded purposes beyond determining connection to a criminal act to include investigative purposes (including identifying unidentified human remains) and prosecutorial, defense, or court-ordered judicial purposes. A new definition of 'accredited forensic laboratory' was created with a 2-year accreditation deadline tied to first grant receipt or first analysis request.

TIMELINE

The DOJ report deadline was extended from 2 years to 3 years after enactment. The scope of recommendations in that report was narrowed, changing from recommending 'implementing forensic investigative genetic genealogy technology' and 'necessary regulations' to simply noting 'expected funding needs' and 'whether regulations are needed.'

TECHNICAL

Reporting requirements in section 3065 were restructured: the trigger changed from receiving a grant to receiving final disbursement of funds, new result categories were added (ongoing analysis, incomplete analysis), and the language shifted from 'identification' to 'lead resulting in identification' for several outcome measures.

Floor votes

How they voted

This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
10
Key actions
4
Committee
3
Jun 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2724-2727; text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR S2724-2726)
upper
Jun 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.
upper
May 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
upper
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
upper
May 22, 2025
Committee
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
upper
May 22, 2025
Introduced
Introduced in Senate
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors

Sponsors