Home Texas Elections 2022 Cassy Garcia

Cassy Garcia

Republican candidate · 2022 general election · Texas

CG

Cassy Garcia

Republican

Races

Campaign finance

FEC data through Dec 31, 2022. Covering the 2022 two-year cycle only.

The 2022 cycle at a glance

Total receipts
$3,485,707
Everything the campaign took in
Individual contributions
$2,986,197
Itemized and unitemized split not reported
PAC and other committees
$219,091
Received from political committees
Campaign spending
$3,401,409
Total disbursements
Cash on hand
$84,299
At the end of the reporting period

Where the money came from

These categories divide total receipts of $3,485,707 exactly once, so they add back up to the reported total.

Receipts by funding category for the 2022 cycle
SourceAmountShare of receipts
Individual contributions$2,986,19785.7%
PAC and other committee contributions$219,0916.3%
Party committee contributions$00.0%
Candidate self-funding$00.0%
Loans$00.0%
Other receipts, including transfers$280,4198.0%
Total receipts$3,485,707100%

Financial position

Cash, debt, refunds, loans, and transfers as reported through Dec 31, 2022 for the 2022 cycle. These are factual reported values, not a judgement about whether a campaign is healthy, viable, or strong. Independent expenditures are never added to or subtracted from any of them: that money was never the campaign's.

Reported financial position for the 2022 cycle
MeasureAmount
Cash on hand at coverage end$84,299
Debts and obligations owed by the committee$0
Debts and obligations owed to the committeeNot reported
Contributions refunded to individuals$2,900
Contributions refunded to committees$500
Transfers received from other authorized committeesAlready raised money moving between the candidate's own committees, not new fundraising.$280,419
Transfers made to other authorized committees$76,281
Repayments of candidate loans$0
Repayments of other loans$0

Calculated from the reported values

Each row below is arithmetic MyRepTracker performed on the values above. Where the FEC published the figure itself, the row says so and no calculation was made.

Values calculated from the reported financial position, with the formula for each
MeasureAmountHow it was produced
Contributions net of refunds$3,201,889Calculated as individual + committee + party + candidate contributions, minus contributions refunded to individuals and committees.
Operating expenditures net of offsetsNot reportedAn input this calculation needs is not published by the source behind this record.
Outstanding candidate loans$0Calculated as loans received from the candidate minus repayments of those loans.
Other outstanding loans$0Calculated as other loans received minus repayments of those loans.
Total contributions refunded$3,400Calculated as refunds to individuals plus refunds to committees.

Change since the previous filing

Both columns come from committee C00775866, so the two periods are comparable. A change is the difference between what 30G 2022 reported and what YE 2022 reported, and the direction is stated in words rather than shown only as a sign. 30G 2022 reported through Nov 28, 2022 and YE 2022 through Dec 31, 2022.

Financial position at the two most recent controlling filings of committee C00775866
Measure30G 2022Reported through Nov 28, 2022YE 2022Reported through Dec 31, 2022Change
Cash on hand at period end$2,958$2,958No change
Debts owed by the committee$0$0No change
Contribution refunds in the period$0$0No change

Cash compared with one period's spending

Cash on hand of $84,299 set beside the $0 this campaign spent during YE 2022, through Dec 31, 2022. This is a ratio between two reported numbers over one named period. It is not a forecast of how long the money will last, and campaigns do not spend evenly across a cycle.

Outside spending

Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with the campaign. This money was never received or controlled by Cassy Garcia. Supporting and opposing spending are kept apart rather than combined into one number, and neither is added to campaign receipts.

Spent supporting

$590,711
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

Spent opposing

$8,485,499
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

What the money was spent on

These spending categories were produced by taxonomy spend-1.2 and the current rules are spend-1.3, so they are withheld until this record is refreshed.

Political committees that contributed directly

Money received by the authorized campaign committee from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.

This total will usually differ from the PAC figure in the summary above. The summary is what the campaign reported receiving in total; this ranking adds up the individual contributions that were itemized, which is a different record made at a different time. Neither is a correction of the other, and the gap is not an error in either one.

Top 5 of 90 shown $276,219 total · $50,619 shown here

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Aug 16, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Political committees ranked by direct contributions
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST INC. CANDIDATE FUND (DBA SUSAN B. ANTHONY PRO-LIFE AMERICA CANDIDATE FUND) C00332296$10,6193.8%3Oct 28, 2022
2MAJORITY COMMITTEE PAC--MC PAC C00428052$10,0003.6%2May 2, 2022
3CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND C00504530$10,0003.6%2Aug 26, 2022
4JOBS, FREEDOM, AND SECURITY PAC C00536540$10,0003.6%2Dec 31, 2021
5E-PAC C00570945$10,0003.6%2Mar 10, 2022
Show the complete list of 90 committees →

Organizations spending independently

Supporting Cassy Garcia

Top 5 of 9 shown $590,711 total · $571,311 shown here

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Aug 16, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Organizations ranked by independent spending supporting this candidate
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1The Sentinel Action Fund C00811166$322,72954.6%3Oct 14, 2022
2TEXANS FOR FREEDOM C00797332$192,81732.6%5Oct 28, 2022
3ENERGIZE OUR FUTURE C00821975$28,8394.9%4Oct 25, 2022
4VALOR AMERICA C00625566$16,6672.8%1Nov 4, 2022
5ELBERT GUILLORY'S AMERICA C00607374$10,2601.7%2Sep 27, 2022
Show the complete list of 9 committees →

Opposing Cassy Garcia

All 3 shown $8,485,499 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Aug 16, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Organizations ranked by independent spending opposing this candidate
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1House Majority PAC C00495028$4,778,21956.3%27Nov 4, 2022
2DCCC C00000935$3,279,20938.6%23Nov 4, 2022
3CHC BOLD PAC C00365536$428,0715.0%3Oct 25, 2022

What that outside spending purchased

Each independent expenditure carries a short description the spending committee wrote, and these categories are those descriptions sorted under taxonomy outside-1.0. Spending supporting Cassy Garcia and spending opposing them are broken down separately and never combined, and every share below is a share of that one direction's total.

The largest category is usually "Advertising, medium not specified". That is not a leftover: it is spending the committee described only as a media buy or as advertising, without saying whether it aired on television, ran online, or arrived in the mail. MyRepTracker reports what was filed rather than assigning it a medium.

Supporting Cassy Garcia

Independent spending supporting this candidate, by reported purpose for the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
PurposeAmount% ShareTransactions
Advertising, medium not specified Reported as a media buy or as advertising, with no medium named. $250,38942.4%6
Broadcast, cable, and radio advertising $142,00024.0%1
Phone calls and text messages $120,97720.5%5
Digital and online advertising $72,56812.3%6
Direct mail $4,7780.8%1
Classified$590,711100.0%
Unclassified filing descriptions$00.0%
Total independent spending$590,711100%19

Opposing Cassy Garcia

Independent spending opposing this candidate, by reported purpose for the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
PurposeAmount% ShareTransactions
Broadcast, cable, and radio advertising $4,277,34650.4%9
Advertising, medium not specified Reported as a media buy or as advertising, with no medium named. $3,121,59236.8%29
Digital and online advertising $1,086,56112.8%15
Classified$8,485,499100.0%
Unclassified filing descriptions$00.0%
Total independent spending$8,485,499100%53

Fundraising channels

Some money arrives through a committee that raised or collected it rather than from a committee that decided to give it. Those committees are listed here instead of among the political committees that contributed, because calling a payment processor or a shared fundraising account a donor would say something the filings do not. None of this is added to, or subtracted from, any total above.

Conduits

A conduit forwards contributions that individuals earmarked for a named candidate. The amounts below come from the receiving campaign's conduit memo records and remain part of its reported individual-contribution total; they are not added to receipts again. MyRepTracker groups only memos carrying a registered conduit committee's FEC ID and does not decode or store contributor names, addresses, employers, occupations, or memo text. The record count is a count of FEC memo records, not donors.

Conduit records shown through Dec 31, 2022 · fetched Aug 20, 2026.

All 2 shown $54,282 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Aug 16, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Registered conduits ranked by individuals' earmarked contributions routed through them
RankCommitteeAmountShareFEC memo recordsLast activity
1GOP WINNING WOMEN-FLORIDA C00825059$57,182105.3%46Oct 19, 2022
2WINRED C00694323-$2,900-5.3%1Oct 11, 2022

Who the committees behind this money were

Every committee here is placed by the registration it filed with the FEC for the 2022 cycle: its designation, its committee type, and the organizational form it reported. That is the FEC's own record and involves no judgement by MyRepTracker, so this covers every itemized dollar. A committee's registration can change between cycles, and each cycle is judged by its own.

Contributed to Cassy Garcia

Committees itemized $276,219 in contributions to this campaign.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Leadership PACs $161,85058.6%4970
Non-connected committees $66,36924.0%1926
Other candidates' committees $29,00010.5%1719
Membership organization PACs $7,5002.7%22
Party committees $5,0001.8%11
Corporate PACs $4,0001.4%12
Corporations without capital stock $2,5000.9%11
Itemized total for this direction$276,219

Spent supporting Cassy Garcia

Committees itemized $590,711 in independent spending supporting Cassy Garcia.

Independent spenders supporting this candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Non-connected committees $585,93399.2%818
Leadership PACs $4,7780.8%11
Itemized total for this direction$590,711

Spent opposing Cassy Garcia

Committees itemized $8,485,499 in independent spending opposing Cassy Garcia.

Independent spenders opposing this candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Non-connected committees $5,206,29061.4%230
Party committees $3,279,20938.6%123
Itemized total for this direction$8,485,499

What interests those committees advance

The FEC publishes no industry or interest field, so unlike the section above this one is a claim MyRepTracker makes. A committee is placed here only when there is a document behind the claim that a reader can open: its own statement of organization, its own published mission statement, or a named third party. Every assignment carries that document on the committee's own page. A committee's name is never evidence of anything.

Categorized is not the same as reviewed. Most of these sectors were assigned by machine from the committee's own filing rather than read by a person. Each committee's own page says which of the two its assignment is, and names the document behind it either way.

Coverage is partial on purpose, and the part that is not covered is shown at full size rather than left out. Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees are excluded outright: their giving is an officeholder's or a party's decision, so no interest label describes it. Categories are taxonomy interest-1.7.

Contributed to Cassy Garcia

Committees itemized $276,219 in contributions to this campaign. $195,850 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $80,369, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $14,000 and committees not yet categorized account for $66,369.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue $10,00012.4%12
Commercial banking Finance, insurance, and real estate $4,0005.0%12
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. $195,850Not applicable6790
Committees not yet categorized $66,36982.6%2127
Base the shares are taken over$80,369100%
Itemized total for this direction$276,219

Spent supporting Cassy Garcia

Committees itemized $590,711 in independent spending supporting Cassy Garcia. $4,778 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $585,933, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $322,729 and committees not yet categorized account for $263,204.

Independent spenders supporting this candidate, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue $322,72955.1%13
Committees not yet categorized $263,20444.9%715
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. $4,778Not applicable11
Base the shares are taken over$585,933100%
Itemized total for this direction$590,711

Spent opposing Cassy Garcia

Committees itemized $8,485,499 in independent spending opposing Cassy Garcia. $3,279,209 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $5,206,290, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $5,206,290 and committees not yet categorized account for $0.

Independent spenders opposing this candidate, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue $5,206,290100.0%230
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. $3,279,209Not applicable123
Base the shares are taken over$5,206,290100%
Itemized total for this direction$8,485,499

Last-minute contributions reported before an election

In the days just before an election, a campaign must tell the FEC within 48 hours about any contribution or loan of $1,000 or more. These notices arrive faster than the regular reporting schedule, and the same money is reported again in the report covering those days. Nothing here is added to receipts: it is a preview of money the ordinary reports will carry, not money beside them.

Reported on notices

$216,336
Across 13 notices, received Feb 10, 2022 to Nov 5, 2022

Still only provisional

$0
Every notice is now covered by a regular report

The most recent notice was filed on Nov 6, 2022. A notice stops being the only record of its money once a regular report covers the same days; those are marked reconciled below and the amounts appear in Cassy Garcia's reported totals through the ordinary schedule.

48-hour notices filed for the 2022 cycle, newest first
FiledAmountEntriesCoversStateFiling
Nov 6, 2022$44,74218Nov 4 to Nov 5, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Nov 3, 2022$43,60015Nov 1 to Nov 2, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Nov 1, 2022$32,79417Nov 1 to Nov 1, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 29, 2022$35,50021Oct 28 to Oct 28, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Sep 2, 2022$10,8003Feb 10 to Feb 16, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
May 19, 2022$8,0003May 19 to May 19, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
May 18, 2022$1,0001May 17 to May 17, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
May 17, 2022$4,0003May 17 to May 17, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
May 16, 2022$5,8002May 9 to May 9, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
May 13, 2022$11,6004May 10 to May 11, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗

The 10 most recent notices of 13 are listed. The amount and count above cover all of them.

Where the individual money was reported from

Contributions from individuals that the campaign itemized, grouped by the state each contributor gave as their address. Contributions of $200 or less in aggregate are not itemized and carry no address, so they are not here at all. These places account for $952,885 of the $3,266,616 this campaign reported from individuals and from transfers by its other authorized committees, across 973 itemized contributions.

From Texas

$463,330
49.0% of the itemized money that has a place

From everywhere else

$482,755
51.0% of the itemized money that has a place

Money from outside Texas is not money from outside the country, and neither figure is evidence that anything unlawful happened. People may contribute to campaigns in states they do not live in, and United States citizens living abroad may contribute at all.

What kind of place it came from

Itemized individual contributions by kind of place, 2022 cycle
Kind of placeAmountContributionsShare
States and the District of ColumbiaContributors who gave an address in one of the fifty states or the District of Columbia.$945,58596999.9%
Armed Forces addressesMilitary mailing addresses used by service members stationed away from home. They are real addresses; they are simply not states.$50010.1%
Not placedContributions the FEC could not attribute to a place. They are reported here and are never assigned to a state or counted in the in-state and out-of-state split.$6,8003Not counted

Places, largest first

Top 10 of 49 places shown as bars. Every place is in the table below.

  • Texas this campaign's state $463,330
  • Florida $66,901
  • California $45,328
  • Virginia $39,468
  • Illinois $38,985
  • New York $27,556
  • Alabama $27,250
  • Kansas $21,041
  • Michigan $17,811
  • New Jersey $16,133
Every place with itemized individual contributions reported for the 2022 cycle
PlaceAmountContributionsShare
Texas this campaign's state$463,33040649.0%
Florida$66,901727.1%
California$45,328754.8%
Virginia$39,468334.2%
Illinois$38,985224.1%
New York$27,556212.9%
Alabama$27,250282.9%
Kansas$21,041162.2%
Michigan$17,811211.9%
New Jersey$16,133131.7%
Washington$14,604241.5%
Tennessee$14,266161.5%
Connecticut$13,450101.4%
Missouri$13,002181.4%
Pennsylvania$9,915101.0%
Ohio$8,378150.9%
District of Columbia$8,150130.9%
Arizona$8,038170.8%
Oregon$7,95070.8%
North Carolina$7,638130.8%
Arkansas$7,10060.8%
Not reported not placed$6,8003Not counted
Massachusetts$6,71580.7%
Louisiana$6,235110.7%
South Carolina$5,777120.6%
Colorado$5,41580.6%
Minnesota$5,37150.6%
Utah$4,73970.5%
Georgia$4,590120.5%
Oklahoma$4,45070.5%
Nebraska$4,15030.4%
Nevada$3,30090.3%
New Hampshire$2,90010.3%
Mississippi$2,87110.3%
Wisconsin$2,15030.2%
New Mexico$1,75030.2%
Alaska$1,24720.1%
Indiana$1,24230.1%
Maryland$1,22740.1%
North Dakota$1,00010.1%
West Virginia$1,00010.1%
Wyoming$77530.1%
Kentucky$68730.1%
Armed Forces Pacific$50010.1%
Delaware$50010.1%
Montana$50010.1%
South Dakota$2501<0.1%
Hawaii$2471<0.1%
Idaho$2032<0.1%
Reported with a place$946,085970100%

Contributions are transactions, not people: one contributor giving every month is counted once for each contribution. No contributor's name, address, employer, or occupation is stored or shown anywhere on this site.

  • $6,800 could not be attributed to a place and is left out of the in-state and out-of-state figures rather than assigned to a state.

How this compares

Compared with U.S. House campaigns in Texas, 2022 cycle: 88 campaigns with a complete Federal Election Commission record for the cycle, out of 89 on file. This is a position in that group, not a score, a grade, or a judgement about the campaign.

Total receipts

Everything the authorized campaign committee took in for this cycle, including contributions, loans, and transfers.

  • This campaign $3,485,707
  • Cohort median $431,837
Total receipts for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Texas, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$3,485,707
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$46,352
Median$431,837
75th percentile$1,846,106
Highest in the cohort$15,916,739
Campaigns counted88

76 of the 88 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 86th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Share of receipts from political committees

Direct contributions from PACs and other political committees as a share of total receipts. Campaigns reporting no receipts at all have no share and are left out of this measure.

  • This campaign 6.3%
  • Cohort median 7.5%
Share of receipts from political committees for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Texas, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign6.3%
Lowest in the cohort0.0%
25th percentile0.0%
Median7.5%
75th percentile29.1%
Highest in the cohort72.7%
Campaigns counted86

40 of the 86 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 47th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Cash on hand

The balance reported at the end of the coverage period. Campaigns report at different times, so this compares balances as of each campaign's own coverage end.

  • This campaign $84,299
  • Cohort median $34,210
Cash on hand for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Texas, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$84,299
Lowest in the cohort-$3,213
25th percentile$900
Median$34,210
75th percentile$317,164
Highest in the cohort$5,312,291
Campaigns counted88

49 of the 88 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 56th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending supporting

Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate. This money was never received or controlled by the campaign.

  • This campaign $590,711
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending supporting for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Texas, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$590,711
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$7
Highest in the cohort$2,881,111
Campaigns counted88

78 of the 88 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 89th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending opposing

Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.

  • This campaign $8,485,499
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending opposing for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Texas, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$8,485,499
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$8,485,499
Campaigns counted88

87 of the 88 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 99th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

  • 1 of the 89 campaigns on file for this cohort have no complete record for the cycle and are not counted in any figure here.

Every comparison is drawn from one two-year cycle and one office. Only campaigns whose FEC record for that cycle is complete are counted; the rest are reported beside the cohort and are never counted as zero. One authorized committee is counted once however many candidacies report it, so where a candidate's committees are all reported by another FEC record, that record supplies the figures for both. A campaign is never compared with another cycle, with a career total, or with a candidate for a different office.

What these numbers mean

Receipts are not the same as contributions
Total receipts include everything the campaign took in, such as contributions, loans, and transfers. Contributions are only the money given by people and committees.
Direct contributions are not outside spending
A direct contribution is money received by the campaign's own authorized committee. An independent expenditure is money another organization spent on its own, without coordinating with the campaign. The Federal Election Commission treats these as different activities, and so does this page.
The organizations named here are political committees
Direct rankings count what one political committee gave to a campaign; outside-spending rankings count what a committee spent independently. A separate conduit section groups individual contributions only when the campaign's memo record supplies a registered conduit committee's FEC ID. It never attributes donors to employers or interest groups, and it never exposes contributor names. Sites using broader attribution rules may therefore report different organization totals.
A cycle may be only partly reported
Filings arrive throughout a two-year cycle. A current cycle shows only what has been filed and processed through the coverage date shown above, so it is not comparable with a finished cycle.
This view is cycle specific
It covers the 2022 two-year cycle only.

Source: Federal Election Commission ↗. MyRepTracker ingests FEC records directly and does not add its own influence, risk, or corruption score.