Home Ohio Elections 2026 Greg Landsman

Greg Landsman

Democratic candidate · 2026 general election · Ohio

Photo of Greg Landsman

Greg Landsman

Democratic

Currently serving in the U.S. House District 1.

Races

Campaign finance

FEC data through Jun 30, 2026. Covering the 2026 two-year cycle only.

Every stored cycle for Greg Landsman is on their legislator profile →

The 2026 cycle at a glance

Total receipts
$4,633,250
Everything the campaign took in
Individual contributions
$2,810,230
Itemized and unitemized split not reported
PAC and other committees
$970,742
Received from political committees
Campaign spending
$1,203,152
Total disbursements
Cash on hand
$3,610,214
At the end of the reporting period

Where the money came from

These categories divide total receipts of $4,633,250 exactly once, so they add back up to the reported total.

Receipts by funding category for the 2026 cycle
SourceAmountShare of receipts
Individual contributions$2,810,23060.7%
PAC and other committee contributions$970,74221.0%
Party committee contributions$5,9450.1%
Candidate self-funding$00.0%
Loans$00.0%
Other receipts, including transfers$846,33218.3%
Total receipts$4,633,250100%

Financial position

Cash, debt, refunds, loans, and transfers as reported through Jun 30, 2026 for the 2026 cycle. These are factual reported values, not a judgement about whether a campaign is healthy, viable, or strong. Independent expenditures are never added to or subtracted from any of them: that money was never the campaign's.

Reported financial position for the 2026 cycle
MeasureAmount
Cash on hand at coverage end$3,610,214
Debts and obligations owed by the committee$0
Debts and obligations owed to the committeeNot reported
Contributions refunded to individuals$9,431
Contributions refunded to committees$19,166
Transfers received from other authorized committeesAlready raised money moving between the candidate's own committees, not new fundraising.$832,158
Transfers made to other authorized committees$0
Repayments of candidate loans$0
Repayments of other loans$0

Calculated from the reported values

Each row below is arithmetic MyRepTracker performed on the values above. Where the FEC published the figure itself, the row says so and no calculation was made.

Values calculated from the reported financial position, with the formula for each
MeasureAmountHow it was produced
Contributions net of refunds$3,758,321Calculated as individual + committee + party + candidate contributions, minus contributions refunded to individuals and committees.
Operating expenditures net of offsetsNot reportedAn input this calculation needs is not published by the source behind this record.
Outstanding candidate loans$0Calculated as loans received from the candidate minus repayments of those loans.
Other outstanding loans$0Calculated as other loans received minus repayments of those loans.
Total contributions refunded$28,597Calculated as refunds to individuals plus refunds to committees.

Change since the previous filing

Both columns come from committee C00800276, so the two periods are comparable. A change is the difference between what 12P 2026 reported and what Q2 2026 reported, and the direction is stated in words rather than shown only as a sign. 12P 2026 reported through Apr 15, 2026 and Q2 2026 through Jun 30, 2026.

Financial position at the two most recent controlling filings of committee C00800276
Measure12P 2026Reported through Apr 15, 2026Q2 2026Reported through Jun 30, 2026Change
Cash on hand at period end$2,939,405$3,610,214Up $670,808
Debts owed by the committee$2,407$0Down $2,407
Contribution refunds in the period$2,434$10,871Up $8,437

Cash compared with one period's spending

Cash on hand of $3,610,214 set beside the $317,376 this campaign spent during Q2 2026, through Jun 30, 2026, which is 11.4 times that period's spending. This is a ratio between two reported numbers over one named period. It is not a forecast of how long the money will last, and campaigns do not spend evenly across a cycle.

Outside spending

Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with the campaign. This money was never received or controlled by Greg Landsman. Supporting and opposing spending are kept apart rather than combined into one number, and neither is added to campaign receipts.

Spent supporting

$178,765
Independent expenditures in the 2026 cycle

Spent opposing

$0
Independent expenditures in the 2026 cycle

What the money was spent on

These categories divide $1,148,223 of itemized spending across 1,343 transactions, through Jun 30, 2026. That subtotal covers the FEC's published operating-expenditure records, which do not include transfers, loan repayments, refunds, or contributions the campaign made, and is 95.4% of the $1,203,152 in total disbursements reported for the 2026 cycle. Every share below is a share of that subtotal and never of total spending. Purposes were classified under taxonomy spend-1.3.

The difference between that subtotal and total disbursements is spending reported without itemization, which cannot be categorized.

Itemized spending by reported purpose for the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
PurposeAmount% ShareTransactions
Administration, salary, and overhead $306,22626.7%306
Fundraising and solicitation $221,55919.3%57
Unclassified filing descriptions Spending whose reported purpose could not be placed in the taxonomy. It is counted, not guessed at. $144,60812.6%349
Consulting, type not specified $88,7007.7%14
Advertising and media $85,1987.4%25
Technology and digital services $72,7376.3%137
Travel $70,8516.2%362
Events $51,1314.5%53
Legal, accounting, and compliance $47,5854.1%20
Polling and research $46,8334.1%2
Campaign materials $12,7951.1%18
Classified$1,003,61587.4%
Unclassified filing descriptions$144,60812.6%
Itemized spending categorized here$1,148,223100%1,343

Political committees that contributed directly

Money received by the authorized campaign committee from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.

This total will usually differ from the PAC figure in the summary above. The summary is what the campaign reported receiving in total; this ranking adds up the individual contributions that were itemized, which is a different record made at a different time. Neither is a correction of the other, and the gap is not an error in either one.

Top 5 of 277 shown $1,003,628 total · $63,200 shown here

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Political committees ranked by direct contributions
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AAJ PAC) C00024521$15,0001.5%6Jun 9, 2026
2AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION PAC C00035451$15,0001.5%7Jan 16, 2026
3ZINC COLLECTIVE PAC C00679191$13,2001.3%4May 7, 2026
4UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION ACTIVE BALLOT CLUB C00002766$10,0001.0%2Nov 6, 2025
5UNITED STEELWORKERS POLITICAL ACTION FUND C00003590$10,0001.0%2Jan 28, 2026
Show the complete list of 277 committees →

Organizations spending independently

Supporting Greg Landsman

All 3 shown $178,765 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Organizations ranked by independent spending supporting this candidate
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1CFFE PAC C00744920$121,47168.0%5Sep 4, 2026
2New American Jobs Fund C00625533$52,40929.3%2Sep 4, 2026
3OHIO CITIZEN ACTION C90021726$4,8852.7%1Sep 4, 2026

Opposing Greg Landsman

No opposing independent expenditures are reported for this cycle.

What that outside spending purchased

Each independent expenditure carries a short description the spending committee wrote, and these categories are those descriptions sorted under taxonomy outside-1.0. Spending supporting Greg Landsman and spending opposing them are broken down separately and never combined, and every share below is a share of that one direction's total.

The largest category is usually "Advertising, medium not specified". That is not a leftover: it is spending the committee described only as a media buy or as advertising, without saying whether it aired on television, ran online, or arrived in the mail. MyRepTracker reports what was filed rather than assigning it a medium.

Supporting Greg Landsman

Independent spending supporting this candidate, by reported purpose for the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
PurposeAmount% ShareTransactions
Canvassing and field organizing $170,10695.2%4
Printed materials and signs $8,6594.8%4
Classified$178,765100.0%
Unclassified filing descriptions$00.0%
Total independent spending$178,765100%8

Opposing Greg Landsman

No independent expenditures in this direction are reported for this cycle.

Who the committees behind this money were

Every committee here is placed by the registration it filed with the FEC for the 2026 cycle: its designation, its committee type, and the organizational form it reported. That is the FEC's own record and involves no judgement by MyRepTracker, so this covers every itemized dollar. A committee's registration can change between cycles, and each cycle is judged by its own.

Contributed to Greg Landsman

Committees itemized $1,003,628 in contributions to this campaign.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Labor union PACs $228,50022.8%3780
Leadership PACs $203,50020.3%5992
Trade association PACs $198,18519.7%59106
Non-connected committees $168,75016.8%5186
Membership organization PACs $113,00011.3%2965
Other candidates' committees $51,5005.1%2232
Corporate PACs $23,5002.3%1416
Cooperative PACs $12,0001.2%58
Party committees $4,6930.5%11
Itemized total for this direction$1,003,628

Spent supporting Greg Landsman

Committees itemized $178,765 in independent spending supporting Greg Landsman.

Independent spenders supporting this candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Non-connected committees $178,765100.0%38
Itemized total for this direction$178,765

What interests those committees advance

The FEC publishes no industry or interest field, so unlike the section above this one is a claim MyRepTracker makes. A committee is placed here only when there is a document behind the claim that a reader can open: its own statement of organization, its own published mission statement, or a named third party. Every assignment carries that document on the committee's own page. A committee's name is never evidence of anything.

Categorized is not the same as reviewed. Most of these sectors were assigned by machine from the committee's own filing rather than read by a person. Each committee's own page says which of the two its assignment is, and names the document behind it either way.

Coverage is partial on purpose, and the part that is not covered is shown at full size rather than left out. Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees are excluded outright: their giving is an officeholder's or a party's decision, so no interest label describes it. Categories are taxonomy interest-1.7.

Contributed to Greg Landsman

Committees itemized $1,003,628 in contributions to this campaign. $259,693 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $743,935, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $515,685 and committees not yet categorized account for $228,250.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Physicians and medical specialties Health $59,5008.0%1639
Building trades unions Labor $55,0007.4%915
Public sector unions Labor $54,5007.3%824
Industrial unions Labor $45,0006.0%59
Transportation unions Labor $41,0005.5%615
Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate $27,0003.6%512
Lawyers and law firms Professional services $24,5003.3%512
Agribusiness Agriculture $20,5002.8%810
Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate $17,5002.4%811
Food and beverage Agriculture $16,0002.2%58
Automotive Transportation $14,1851.9%36
Health insurance Health $12,0001.6%44
Hospitals and nursing homes Health $12,0001.6%510
Media and entertainment Communications and technology $11,0001.5%26
Mining Energy and natural resources $11,0001.5%29
Pro-Israel Ideological and single-issue $11,0001.5%23
Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue $10,0001.3%12
Telecommunications Communications and technology $10,0001.3%56
Air transport Transportation $8,5001.1%24
Construction Construction $8,0001.1%34
Pharmaceuticals Health $7,0000.9%55
Electric utilities Energy and natural resources $6,0000.8%25
Nurses and nursing specialties Health $6,0000.8%23
Securities and investment Finance, insurance, and real estate $6,0000.8%25
Democracy and election reform Ideological and single-issue $5,0000.7%13
Renewable energy Energy and natural resources $5,0000.7%11
Credit unions Finance, insurance, and real estate $3,5000.5%11
Commercial banking Finance, insurance, and real estate $3,0000.4%13
LGBTQ rights Ideological and single-issue $2,5000.3%11
Technology Communications and technology $2,0000.3%22
Oil and gas Energy and natural resources $1,5000.2%11
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. $259,693Not applicable82125
Committees not yet categorized $228,25030.7%72122
Base the shares are taken over$743,935100%
Itemized total for this direction$1,003,628

Spent supporting Greg Landsman

Committees itemized $178,765 in independent spending supporting Greg Landsman. Of that, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $121,471 and committees not yet categorized account for $57,293.

Independent spenders supporting this candidate, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue $121,47168.0%15
Committees not yet categorized $57,29332.0%23
Base the shares are taken over$178,765100%
Itemized total for this direction$178,765

Last-minute contributions reported before an election

In the days just before an election, a campaign must tell the FEC within 48 hours about any contribution or loan of $1,000 or more. These notices arrive faster than the regular reporting schedule, and the same money is reported again in the report covering those days. Nothing here is added to receipts: it is a preview of money the ordinary reports will carry, not money beside them.

Reported on notices

$205,615
Across 9 notices, received Apr 12, 2026 to May 2, 2026

Still only provisional

$42,529
1 notice no stored regular report covers yet

The most recent notice was filed on May 3, 2026. A notice stops being the only record of its money once a regular report covers the same days; those are marked reconciled below and the amounts appear in Greg Landsman's reported totals through the ordinary schedule.

48-hour notices filed for the 2026 cycle, newest first
FiledAmountEntriesCoversStateFiling
May 3, 2026$13,6936May 2 to May 2, 2026Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
May 2, 2026$42,52920Apr 12 to May 1, 2026ProvisionalFEC filing ↗
Apr 30, 2026$54,50026Apr 28 to Apr 29, 2026Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Apr 28, 2026$8,0006Apr 26 to Apr 27, 2026Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Apr 26, 2026$11,3576Apr 24 to Apr 25, 2026Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Apr 24, 2026$34,50022Apr 22 to Apr 23, 2026Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Apr 22, 2026$12,0008Apr 20 to Apr 21, 2026Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Apr 20, 2026$1,2501Apr 18 to Apr 18, 2026Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Apr 18, 2026$27,78510Apr 16 to Apr 17, 2026Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗

Where the individual money was reported from

Contributions from individuals that the campaign itemized, grouped by the state each contributor gave as their address. Contributions of $200 or less in aggregate are not itemized and carry no address, so they are not here at all. These places account for $2,572,551 of the $3,642,389 this campaign reported from individuals and from transfers by its other authorized committees, across 3,375 itemized contributions.

From Ohio

$814,738
31.7% of the itemized money that has a place

From everywhere else

$1,757,813
68.3% of the itemized money that has a place

Money from outside Ohio is not money from outside the country, and neither figure is evidence that anything unlawful happened. People may contribute to campaigns in states they do not live in, and United States citizens living abroad may contribute at all.

What kind of place it came from

Itemized individual contributions by kind of place, 2026 cycle
Kind of placeAmountContributionsShare
States and the District of ColumbiaContributors who gave an address in one of the fifty states or the District of Columbia.$2,569,0513,37499.9%
United States territoriesPuerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands.$3,50010.1%

Places, largest first

Top 10 of 46 places shown as bars. Every place is in the table below.

  • Ohio this campaign's state $814,738
  • California $389,077
  • New York $269,513
  • Massachusetts $166,401
  • Maryland $128,302
  • Florida $110,386
  • District of Columbia $97,694
  • Illinois $96,761
  • Connecticut $56,926
  • Texas $44,573
Every place with itemized individual contributions reported for the 2026 cycle
PlaceAmountContributionsShare
Ohio this campaign's state$814,7381,77131.7%
California$389,07729315.1%
New York$269,51320810.5%
Massachusetts$166,4011836.5%
Maryland$128,3021555.0%
Florida$110,3861054.3%
District of Columbia$97,6941423.8%
Illinois$96,7611043.8%
Connecticut$56,926352.2%
Texas$44,573361.7%
Virginia$37,000471.4%
Washington$33,831291.3%
Georgia$33,635241.3%
Kentucky$28,330271.1%
Colorado$26,150171.0%
New Jersey$25,304191.0%
Alabama$22,950360.9%
Oregon$18,740190.7%
Pennsylvania$18,590160.7%
Maine$14,50050.6%
Nevada$13,00040.5%
Michigan$12,25090.5%
North Carolina$12,10090.5%
Minnesota$11,56080.4%
Oklahoma$11,50040.4%
New Hampshire$10,50050.4%
South Carolina$7,50060.3%
Arizona$7,00020.3%
Idaho$7,00020.3%
Mississippi$7,00020.3%
Missouri$6,30760.2%
Delaware$4,00020.2%
Rhode Island$3,65030.1%
Puerto Rico$3,50010.1%
South Dakota$3,50010.1%
New Mexico$3,25030.1%
Utah$3,25040.1%
Wisconsin$3,00020.1%
Hawaii$2,541140.1%
Louisiana$2,00010.1%
Indiana$1,787100.1%
Wyoming$1,2501<0.1%
Montana$6251<0.1%
Alaska$5001<0.1%
Tennessee$5001<0.1%
Kansas$802<0.1%
Reported with a place$2,572,5513,375100%

Contributions are transactions, not people: one contributor giving every month is counted once for each contribution. No contributor's name, address, employer, or occupation is stored or shown anywhere on this site.

How this compares

Compared with U.S. House campaigns in Ohio, 2026 cycle: 70 campaigns with a complete Federal Election Commission record for the cycle. This is a position in that group, not a score, a grade, or a judgement about the campaign.

Total receipts

Everything the authorized campaign committee took in for this cycle, including contributions, loans, and transfers.

  • This campaign $4,633,250
  • Cohort median $45,288
Total receipts for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Ohio, 2026 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$4,633,250
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$11,664
Median$45,288
75th percentile$894,595
Highest in the cohort$4,774,322
Campaigns counted70

68 of the 70 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 97th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Share of receipts from political committees

Direct contributions from PACs and other political committees as a share of total receipts. Campaigns reporting no receipts at all have no share and are left out of this measure.

  • This campaign 20.9%
  • Cohort median 0.2%
Share of receipts from political committees for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Ohio, 2026 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign20.9%
Lowest in the cohort0.0%
25th percentile0.0%
Median0.2%
75th percentile11.1%
Highest in the cohort73.8%
Campaigns counted64

49 of the 64 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 77th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Cash on hand

The balance reported at the end of the coverage period. Campaigns report at different times, so this compares balances as of each campaign's own coverage end.

  • This campaign $3,610,214
  • Cohort median $5,759
Cash on hand for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Ohio, 2026 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$3,610,214
Lowest in the cohort-$76,246
25th percentile$12
Median$5,759
75th percentile$312,290
Highest in the cohort$6,030,301
Campaigns counted70

68 of the 70 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 97th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending supporting

Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate. This money was never received or controlled by the campaign.

  • This campaign $178,765
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending supporting for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Ohio, 2026 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$178,765
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$714,557
Campaigns counted70

66 of the 70 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 94th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending opposing

Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.

  • This campaign $0
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending opposing for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Ohio, 2026 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$0
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$706,277
Campaigns counted70

0 of the 70 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 0th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Every comparison is drawn from one two-year cycle and one office. Only campaigns whose FEC record for that cycle is complete are counted; the rest are reported beside the cohort and are never counted as zero. One authorized committee is counted once however many candidacies report it, so where a candidate's committees are all reported by another FEC record, that record supplies the figures for both. A campaign is never compared with another cycle, with a career total, or with a candidate for a different office.

What these numbers mean

Receipts are not the same as contributions
Total receipts include everything the campaign took in, such as contributions, loans, and transfers. Contributions are only the money given by people and committees.
Direct contributions are not outside spending
A direct contribution is money received by the campaign's own authorized committee. An independent expenditure is money another organization spent on its own, without coordinating with the campaign. The Federal Election Commission treats these as different activities, and so does this page.
The organizations named here are political committees
Direct rankings count what one political committee gave to a campaign; outside-spending rankings count what a committee spent independently. A separate conduit section groups individual contributions only when the campaign's memo record supplies a registered conduit committee's FEC ID. It never attributes donors to employers or interest groups, and it never exposes contributor names. Sites using broader attribution rules may therefore report different organization totals.
A cycle may be only partly reported
Filings arrive throughout a two-year cycle. A current cycle shows only what has been filed and processed through the coverage date shown above, so it is not comparable with a finished cycle.
This view is cycle specific
It covers the 2026 two-year cycle only.

Source: Federal Election Commission ↗. MyRepTracker ingests FEC records directly and does not add its own influence, risk, or corruption score.