SC
Steve Chabot
U.S. House District 1
2022 general election. Election concluded.
Incumbents
No incumbent is running.
Challengers
Campaign finance
Federal Election Commission filings for the 2022 two-year cycle. Candidates appear in the order they are listed on this page. They are not ranked by money, and these measures are never combined into a single score.
Every candidate below reports through Dec 31, 2022.
| Candidate | Total receipts | Cash on hand | Direct PAC receipts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Chabot Republican | $2,234,659 | $38,988 | $851,978 |
| Greg Landsman Democratic | $2,768,116 | $68,049 | $362,457 |
Each measure below has its own scale and starts at zero, so bars can be read against each other within a measure but not across measures. Every figure is reported through Dec 31, 2022.
Total receipts
Everything the authorized campaign committee took in, including contributions, loans, and transfers.
Highest total receipts: Greg Landsman at $2,768,116. Lowest: Steve Chabot at $2,234,659. The largest reported value sets this scale at $2,768,116.
Cash on hand
The balance the campaign reported at the end of its coverage period.
Highest cash on hand: Greg Landsman at $68,049. Lowest: Steve Chabot at $38,988. The largest reported value sets this scale at $68,049.
Direct PAC receipts
Money the campaign received from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.
Highest direct PAC receipts: Steve Chabot at $851,978. Lowest: Greg Landsman at $362,457. The largest reported value sets this scale at $851,978.
Outside spending supporting
Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate, not coordinated with the campaign and never received by it.
Highest outside spending supporting: Steve Chabot at $692,020. Lowest: Greg Landsman at $612,530. The largest reported value sets this scale at $692,020.
Outside spending opposing
Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.
Highest outside spending opposing: Steve Chabot at $3,597,980. Lowest: Greg Landsman at $1,950,411. The largest reported value sets this scale at $3,597,980.
Where each campaign's committee money came from
Each column is one candidate and each figure is that candidate's own money, taken over that candidate's own itemized total. Nothing here is added across candidates, and the two groupings below are never added to each other: the first is who the FEC says runs the giving committee, which covers every dollar, and the second is what interest a source says that committee advances, which is a claim MyRepTracker makes and covers only part of the money.
Contributions each campaign received, by who runs the committee
| Category | Steve Chabot Republican | Greg Landsman Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Leadership PACs | $273,20032.2% | $124,50132.8% |
| Corporate PACs | $176,75020.9% | $2,2850.6% |
| Non-connected committees | $80,7509.5% | $73,16219.3% |
| Trade association PACs | $139,28516.4% | $2,5000.7% |
| Other candidates' committees | $97,50011.5% | $32,3888.5% |
| Labor union PACs | $2,5000.3% | $103,00027.2% |
| Membership organization PACs | $59,3507.0% | $31,5008.3% |
| Party committees | $5,0000.6% | $9,9982.6% |
| Corporations without capital stock | $12,9001.5% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $847,235 | $379,334 |
Contributions each campaign received, by interest advanced
| Category | Steve Chabot Republican | Greg Landsman Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Building trades unions Labor | $0 | $39,50018.6% |
| Defense Defense | $31,0006.6% | $0 |
| Public sector unions Labor | $0 | $27,50012.9% |
| Food and beverage Agriculture | $25,3855.4% | $0 |
| Media and entertainment Communications and technology | $23,5005.0% | $1,0000.5% |
| Construction Construction | $23,0004.9% | $0 |
| Transportation unions Labor | $2,5000.5% | $20,0009.4% |
| Telecommunications Communications and technology | $14,0003.0% | $5,0002.4% |
| Securities and investment Finance, insurance, and real estate | $17,7503.8% | $0 |
| Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate | $17,5003.7% | $0 |
| Commercial banking Finance, insurance, and real estate | $16,5003.5% | $0 |
| Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue | $15,0003.2% | $0 |
| Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate | $13,0002.8% | $0 |
| Automotive Transportation | $10,0002.1% | $2,5001.2% |
| Credit unions Finance, insurance, and real estate | $10,0002.1% | $2,5001.2% |
| Industrial unions Labor | $0 | $10,0004.7% |
| Physicians and medical specialties Health | $9,5002.0% | $0 |
| Trucking Transportation | $8,9001.9% | $0 |
| Oil and gas Energy and natural resources | $8,5001.8% | $0 |
| Pro-Israel Ideological and single-issue | $7,9001.7% | $0 |
| Air transport Transportation | $7,5001.6% | $0 |
| Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue | $0 | $7,0003.3% |
| Lawyers and law firms Professional services | $1,0000.2% | $5,0002.4% |
| Technology Communications and technology | $6,0001.3% | $0 |
| Accounting Professional services | $5,0001.1% | $0 |
| Electric utilities Energy and natural resources | $5,0001.1% | $0 |
| LGBTQ rights Ideological and single-issue | $0 | $5,0002.4% |
| Agribusiness Agriculture | $4,5001.0% | $0 |
| Mining Energy and natural resources | $3,5000.7% | $0 |
| Democracy and election reform Ideological and single-issue | $0 | $3,0001.4% |
| Pharmaceuticals Health | $2,5000.5% | $0 |
| Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees | $375,700 | $166,887 |
| Committees not yet categorized | $182,60038.7% | $84,44739.7% |
| Itemized total | $847,235 | $379,334 |
Independent spending supporting each candidate, by who runs the committee
| Category | Steve Chabot Republican | Greg Landsman Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Non-connected committees | $692,020100.0% | $445,87072.8% |
| Party committees | $0 | $166,66027.2% |
| Itemized total | $692,020 | $612,530 |
Independent spending supporting each candidate, by interest advanced
| Category | Steve Chabot Republican | Greg Landsman Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue | $688,33999.5% | $0 |
| Renewable energy Energy and natural resources | $0 | $65,47514.7% |
| Environmental advocacy Ideological and single-issue | $0 | $41,9629.4% |
| Industrial unions Labor | $0 | $40,7859.1% |
| Committees not yet categorized | $3,6810.5% | $297,64866.8% |
| Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees | $0 | $166,660 |
| Itemized total | $692,020 | $612,530 |
Independent spending opposing each candidate, by who runs the committee
| Category | Steve Chabot Republican | Greg Landsman Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Party committees | $1,209,52633.6% | $1,849,62994.8% |
| Non-connected committees | $2,388,45466.4% | $100,7825.2% |
| Itemized total | $3,597,980 | $1,950,411 |
Independent spending opposing each candidate, by interest advanced
| Category | Steve Chabot Republican | Greg Landsman Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue | $2,374,67299.4% | $0 |
| Abortion rights Ideological and single-issue | $0 | $73,65273.1% |
| Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue | $0 | $27,13026.9% |
| Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees | $1,209,526 | $1,849,629 |
| Committees not yet categorized | $13,7810.6% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $3,597,980 | $1,950,411 |
Last-minute contributions reported before an election
Within 48 hours of receiving a contribution or loan of $1,000 or more in the days just before an election, a campaign must notify the FEC. These notices are provisional: the same money appears again in the regular report covering those days, so it is not added to the amounts above and is not compared as a measure. Candidates file them only while their own election is close, so an absence here says nothing about a campaign's fundraising.
| Candidate | Reported on notices | Notices | Covers | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Chabot Republican | $308,120 | 23 | Oct 19 to Nov 5, 2022 | $43,000 still provisional |
| Greg Landsman Democratic | $181,318 | 19 | Apr 14 to Nov 4, 2022 | Covered by regular reports |
Direct contributions are money the campaign received. Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with any campaign, and are never added to a candidate's receipts. Source: Federal Election Commission ↗.