Home North Dakota Elections 2022 Cara Mund

Cara Mund

Independent candidate · 2022 general election · North Dakota

CM

Cara Mund

Independent

Races

Campaign finance

FEC data through Dec 31, 2022. Covering the 2022 two-year cycle only.

The 2022 cycle at a glance

Total receipts
$173,270
Everything the campaign took in
Individual contributions
$172,945
Itemized and unitemized split not reported
PAC and other committees
$0
Received from political committees
Campaign spending
$157,732
Total disbursements
Cash on hand
$15,538
At the end of the reporting period

Where the money came from

These categories divide total receipts of $173,270 exactly once, so they add back up to the reported total.

Receipts by funding category for the 2022 cycle
SourceAmountShare of receipts
Individual contributions$172,94599.8%
PAC and other committee contributions$00.0%
Party committee contributions$00.0%
Candidate self-funding$00.0%
Loans$00.0%
Other receipts, including transfers$3250.2%
Total receipts$173,270100%

Financial position

Cash, debt, refunds, loans, and transfers as reported through Dec 31, 2022 for the 2022 cycle. These are factual reported values, not a judgement about whether a campaign is healthy, viable, or strong. Independent expenditures are never added to or subtracted from any of them: that money was never the campaign's.

Reported financial position for the 2022 cycle
MeasureAmount
Cash on hand at coverage end$15,538
Debts and obligations owed by the committee$0
Debts and obligations owed to the committeeNot reported
Contributions refunded to individuals$0
Contributions refunded to committees$0
Transfers received from other authorized committeesAlready raised money moving between the candidate's own committees, not new fundraising.$0
Transfers made to other authorized committees$0
Repayments of candidate loans$0
Repayments of other loans$0

Calculated from the reported values

Each row below is arithmetic MyRepTracker performed on the values above. Where the FEC published the figure itself, the row says so and no calculation was made.

Values calculated from the reported financial position, with the formula for each
MeasureAmountHow it was produced
Contributions net of refunds$172,945Calculated as individual + committee + party + candidate contributions, minus contributions refunded to individuals and committees.
Operating expenditures net of offsetsNot reportedAn input this calculation needs is not published by the source behind this record.
Outstanding candidate loans$0Calculated as loans received from the candidate minus repayments of those loans.
Other outstanding loans$0Calculated as other loans received minus repayments of those loans.
Total contributions refunded$0Calculated as refunds to individuals plus refunds to committees.

Change since the previous filing

Both columns come from committee C00823815, so the two periods are comparable. A change is the difference between what 30G 2022 reported and what YE 2022 reported, and the direction is stated in words rather than shown only as a sign. 30G 2022 reported through Nov 28, 2022 and YE 2022 through Dec 31, 2022.

Financial position at the two most recent controlling filings of committee C00823815
Measure30G 2022Reported through Nov 28, 2022YE 2022Reported through Dec 31, 2022Change
Cash on hand at period end$15,547$15,538Down $9
Debts owed by the committee$0$0No change
Contribution refunds in the period$0$0No change

Cash compared with one period's spending

Cash on hand of $15,538 set beside the $9 this campaign spent during YE 2022, through Dec 31, 2022, which is 1726.5 times that period's spending. This is a ratio between two reported numbers over one named period. It is not a forecast of how long the money will last, and campaigns do not spend evenly across a cycle.

Outside spending

Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with the campaign. This money was never received or controlled by Cara Mund. Supporting and opposing spending are kept apart rather than combined into one number, and neither is added to campaign receipts.

Spent supporting

$0
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

Spent opposing

$0
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

What the money was spent on

These spending categories were produced by taxonomy spend-1.2 and the current rules are spend-1.3, so they are withheld until this record is refreshed.

Political committees that contributed directly

Money received by the authorized campaign committee from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.

This total will usually differ from the PAC figure in the summary above. The summary is what the campaign reported receiving in total; this ranking adds up the individual contributions that were itemized, which is a different record made at a different time. Neither is a correction of the other, and the gap is not an error in either one.

No direct contributions from political committees are reported for this cycle.

Last-minute contributions reported before an election

In the days just before an election, a campaign must tell the FEC within 48 hours about any contribution or loan of $1,000 or more. These notices arrive faster than the regular reporting schedule, and the same money is reported again in the report covering those days. Nothing here is added to receipts: it is a preview of money the ordinary reports will carry, not money beside them.

Reported on notices

$4,900
Across 1 notice, received Nov 2, 2022 to Nov 2, 2022

Still only provisional

$0
Every notice is now covered by a regular report

The most recent notice was filed on Nov 2, 2022. A notice stops being the only record of its money once a regular report covers the same days; those are marked reconciled below and the amounts appear in Cara Mund's reported totals through the ordinary schedule.

48-hour notices filed for the 2022 cycle, newest first
FiledAmountEntriesCoversStateFiling
Nov 2, 2022$4,9003Nov 2 to Nov 2, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗

Where the individual money was reported from

Contributions from individuals that the campaign itemized, grouped by the state each contributor gave as their address. Contributions of $200 or less in aggregate are not itemized and carry no address, so they are not here at all. These places account for $113,580 of the $172,945 this campaign reported from individuals and from transfers by its other authorized committees, across 138 itemized contributions.

From North Dakota

$94,230
83.0% of the itemized money that has a place

From everywhere else

$19,350
17.0% of the itemized money that has a place

Money from outside North Dakota is not money from outside the country, and neither figure is evidence that anything unlawful happened. People may contribute to campaigns in states they do not live in, and United States citizens living abroad may contribute at all.

What kind of place it came from

Itemized individual contributions by kind of place, 2022 cycle
Kind of placeAmountContributionsShare
States and the District of ColumbiaContributors who gave an address in one of the fifty states or the District of Columbia.$113,580138100.0%

Places, largest first

Top 10 of 13 places shown as bars. Every place is in the table below.

  • North Dakota this campaign's state $94,230
  • New York $5,900
  • Arkansas $2,900
  • Minnesota $2,900
  • California $2,250
  • Arizona $1,000
  • Georgia $1,000
  • Texas $1,000
  • Washington $750
  • Massachusetts $500
Every place with itemized individual contributions reported for the 2022 cycle
PlaceAmountContributionsShare
North Dakota this campaign's state$94,23012183.0%
New York$5,90035.2%
Arkansas$2,90012.6%
Minnesota$2,90012.6%
California$2,25032.0%
Arizona$1,00010.9%
Georgia$1,00010.9%
Texas$1,00010.9%
Washington$75020.7%
Massachusetts$50010.4%
Montana$50010.4%
New Hampshire$40010.4%
District of Columbia$25010.2%
Reported with a place$113,580138100%

Contributions are transactions, not people: one contributor giving every month is counted once for each contribution. No contributor's name, address, employer, or occupation is stored or shown anywhere on this site.

How this compares

Compared with U.S. House campaigns nationwide, 2022 cycle: 1,118 campaigns with a complete Federal Election Commission record for the cycle, out of 1,123 on file. This is a position in that group, not a score, a grade, or a judgement about the campaign. Too few North Dakota campaigns have a complete record for this cycle to compare within the state, so the comparison is national.

Total receipts

Everything the authorized campaign committee took in for this cycle, including contributions, loans, and transfers.

  • This campaign $173,270
  • Cohort median $755,684
Total receipts for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns nationwide, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$173,270
Lowest in the cohort-$36,839
25th percentile$38,118
Median$755,684
75th percentile$2,168,424
Highest in the cohort$28,295,640
Campaigns counted1,118

417 of the 1,118 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 37th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Share of receipts from political committees

Direct contributions from PACs and other political committees as a share of total receipts. Campaigns reporting no receipts at all have no share and are left out of this measure.

  • This campaign 0.0%
  • Cohort median 10.0%
Share of receipts from political committees for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns nationwide, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign0.0%
Lowest in the cohort0.0%
25th percentile0.0%
Median10.0%
75th percentile33.0%
Highest in the cohort100.0%
Campaigns counted1,051

0 of the 1,051 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 0th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Cash on hand

The balance reported at the end of the coverage period. Campaigns report at different times, so this compares balances as of each campaign's own coverage end.

  • This campaign $15,538
  • Cohort median $19,639
Cash on hand for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns nationwide, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$15,538
Lowest in the cohort-$13,741
25th percentile$482
Median$19,639
75th percentile$303,954
Highest in the cohort$21,022,960
Campaigns counted1,118

537 of the 1,118 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 48th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending supporting

Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate. This money was never received or controlled by the campaign.

  • This campaign $0
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending supporting for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns nationwide, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$0
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$17,917
Highest in the cohort$6,797,186
Campaigns counted1,118

0 of the 1,118 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 0th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending opposing

Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.

  • This campaign $0
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending opposing for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns nationwide, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$0
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$10,820,548
Campaigns counted1,118

0 of the 1,118 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 0th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

  • 5 of the 1123 campaigns on file for this cohort have no complete record for the cycle and are not counted in any figure here.

Every comparison is drawn from one two-year cycle and one office. Only campaigns whose FEC record for that cycle is complete are counted; the rest are reported beside the cohort and are never counted as zero. One authorized committee is counted once however many candidacies report it, so where a candidate's committees are all reported by another FEC record, that record supplies the figures for both. A campaign is never compared with another cycle, with a career total, or with a candidate for a different office.

What these numbers mean

Receipts are not the same as contributions
Total receipts include everything the campaign took in, such as contributions, loans, and transfers. Contributions are only the money given by people and committees.
Direct contributions are not outside spending
A direct contribution is money received by the campaign's own authorized committee. An independent expenditure is money another organization spent on its own, without coordinating with the campaign. The Federal Election Commission treats these as different activities, and so does this page.
The organizations named here are political committees
Direct rankings count what one political committee gave to a campaign; outside-spending rankings count what a committee spent independently. A separate conduit section groups individual contributions only when the campaign's memo record supplies a registered conduit committee's FEC ID. It never attributes donors to employers or interest groups, and it never exposes contributor names. Sites using broader attribution rules may therefore report different organization totals.
A cycle may be only partly reported
Filings arrive throughout a two-year cycle. A current cycle shows only what has been filed and processed through the coverage date shown above, so it is not comparable with a finished cycle.
This view is cycle specific
It covers the 2022 two-year cycle only.

Source: Federal Election Commission ↗. MyRepTracker ingests FEC records directly and does not add its own influence, risk, or corruption score.