Home New Hampshire Elections 2022 U.S. House District 2

U.S. House District 2

2022 general election. Election concluded.

Archive: This page reflects certified results from the 2022 general election (certified January 31, 2023).

Incumbents

No incumbent is running.

Challengers

Campaign finance

Federal Election Commission filings for the 2022 two-year cycle. Candidates appear in the order they are listed on this page. They are not ranked by money, and these measures are never combined into a single score.

Every candidate below reports through Dec 31, 2022.

Reported campaign finance for each candidate with complete FEC data in the 2022 cycle
CandidateTotal receiptsCash on handDirect PAC receipts
Ann Kuster Democratic$4,449,498$146,138$1,685,047
Robert Burns Republican$401,646$2,318$24,500

Each measure below has its own scale and starts at zero, so bars can be read against each other within a measure but not across measures. Every figure is reported through Dec 31, 2022.

Total receipts

Everything the authorized campaign committee took in, including contributions, loans, and transfers.

Highest total receipts: Ann Kuster at $4,449,498. Lowest: Robert Burns at $401,646. The largest reported value sets this scale at $4,449,498.

Cash on hand

The balance the campaign reported at the end of its coverage period.

Highest cash on hand: Ann Kuster at $146,138. Lowest: Robert Burns at $2,318. The largest reported value sets this scale at $146,138.

Direct PAC receipts

Money the campaign received from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.

Highest direct PAC receipts: Ann Kuster at $1,685,047. Lowest: Robert Burns at $24,500. The largest reported value sets this scale at $1,685,047.

Outside spending supporting

Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate, not coordinated with the campaign and never received by it.

Highest outside spending supporting: Ann Kuster at $79,012. Lowest: Robert Burns at $3,115. The largest reported value sets this scale at $79,012.

Outside spending opposing

Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.

Highest outside spending opposing: Robert Burns at $1,710,040. Lowest: Ann Kuster at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $1,710,040.

Where each campaign's committee money came from

Each column is one candidate and each figure is that candidate's own money, taken over that candidate's own itemized total. Nothing here is added across candidates, and the two groupings below are never added to each other: the first is who the FEC says runs the giving committee, which covers every dollar, and the second is what interest a source says that committee advances, which is a claim MyRepTracker makes and covers only part of the money.

Contributions each campaign received, by who runs the committee

Contributions each campaign received for each compared candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs the giving committee
CategoryAnn Kuster DemocraticRobert Burns Republican
Corporate PACs$507,67530.3%$0
Trade association PACs$279,50016.7%$0
Leadership PACs$240,40014.4%$3,50013.2%
Labor union PACs$193,50011.6%$0
Membership organization PACs$175,39310.5%$6,00022.6%
Non-connected committees$154,1659.2%$11,00041.5%
Other candidates' committees$82,0304.9%$0
Corporations without capital stock$16,5001.0%$1,0003.8%
Cooperative PACs$15,0000.9%$0
Party committees$9,9980.6%$5,00018.9%
Itemized total$1,674,161$26,500

Contributions each campaign received, by interest advanced

Contributions each campaign received for each compared candidate, grouped by the interest the giving committee is categorized as advancing
CategoryAnn Kuster DemocraticRobert Burns Republican
Physicians and medical specialties Health$112,5008.4%$0
Pharmaceuticals Health$87,0006.5%$0
Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate$71,0005.3%$0
Public sector unions Labor$65,5004.9%$0
Health insurance Health$62,0004.6%$0
Telecommunications Communications and technology$57,5004.3%$0
Securities and investment Finance, insurance, and real estate$52,5003.9%$0
Building trades unions Labor$48,5003.6%$0
Agribusiness Agriculture$47,5003.5%$0
Defense Defense$45,5003.4%$0
Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate$41,0003.1%$0
Technology Communications and technology$40,1403.0%$0
Food and beverage Agriculture$37,0002.8%$0
Industrial unions Labor$35,5002.6%$0
Commercial banking Finance, insurance, and real estate$32,5002.4%$0
Automotive Transportation$30,5002.3%$0
Transportation unions Labor$30,0002.2%$0
Media and entertainment Communications and technology$23,0001.7%$0
Air transport Transportation$16,5001.2%$0
Nurses and nursing specialties Health$14,5001.1%$0
Electric utilities Energy and natural resources$12,0000.9%$0
Hospitals and nursing homes Health$12,0000.9%$0
Lawyers and law firms Professional services$12,0000.9%$0
Construction Construction$10,0000.7%$0
Credit unions Finance, insurance, and real estate$10,0000.7%$0
Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue$10,0000.7%$0
Accounting Professional services$9,0000.7%$0
Trucking Transportation$1,0000.1%$0
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees$332,428$8,500
Committees not yet categorized$315,59323.5%$18,000100.0%
Itemized total$1,674,161$26,500

Independent spending supporting each candidate, by who runs the committee

Independent spending supporting each candidate for each compared candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs the giving committee
CategoryAnn Kuster DemocraticRobert Burns Republican
Non-connected committees$79,012100.0%$3,115100.0%
Itemized total$79,012$3,115

Independent spending supporting each candidate, by interest advanced

Independent spending supporting each candidate for each compared candidate, grouped by the interest the giving committee is categorized as advancing
CategoryAnn Kuster DemocraticRobert Burns Republican
Renewable energy Energy and natural resources$42,25253.5%$0
Environmental advocacy Ideological and single-issue$30,36838.4%$0
Committees not yet categorized$6,3918.1%$3,115100.0%
Itemized total$79,012$3,115

Independent spending opposing each candidate, by who runs the committee

Independent spending opposing each candidate for each compared candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs the giving committee
CategoryAnn Kuster DemocraticRobert Burns Republican
Non-connected committees$0$1,710,040100.0%
Itemized total$0$1,710,040

Independent spending opposing each candidate, by interest advanced

Independent spending opposing each candidate for each compared candidate, grouped by the interest the giving committee is categorized as advancing
CategoryAnn Kuster DemocraticRobert Burns Republican
Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue$0$1,083,22063.3%
Committees not yet categorized$0$626,82036.7%
Itemized total$0$1,710,040

Last-minute contributions reported before an election

Within 48 hours of receiving a contribution or loan of $1,000 or more in the days just before an election, a campaign must notify the FEC. These notices are provisional: the same money appears again in the regular report covering those days, so it is not added to the amounts above and is not compared as a measure. Candidates file them only while their own election is close, so an absence here says nothing about a campaign's fundraising.

48-hour notices reported by candidates in this race
CandidateReported on noticesNoticesCoversState
Ann Kuster Democratic$315,93529Oct 20 to Nov 5, 2022$3,500 still provisional
Robert Burns Republican$2,9001Sep 1 to Sep 1, 2022Covered by regular reports

Direct contributions are money the campaign received. Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with any campaign, and are never added to a candidate's receipts. Source: Federal Election Commission ↗.