Pete Ricketts
U.S. Senate District (at-large)
2026 general election.
Incumbents
Challengers
Campaign finance
Federal Election Commission filings for the 2026 two-year cycle. Candidates appear in the order they are listed on this page. They are not ranked by money, and these measures are never combined into a single score.
Every candidate below reports through Jun 30, 2026.
| Candidate | Total receipts | Cash on hand | Direct PAC receipts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Ricketts Republican incumbent | $11,233,507 | $6,910,970 | $1,639,815 |
| Dan Osborn Independent | $5,751,951 | $2,421,487 | $139,868 |
| Mike Marvin Legal Marijuana Now | $27,745 | $2,616 | $0 |
Each measure below has its own scale and starts at zero, so bars can be read against each other within a measure but not across measures. Every figure is reported through Jun 30, 2026.
Total receipts
Everything the authorized campaign committee took in, including contributions, loans, and transfers.
Highest total receipts: Pete Ricketts at $11,233,507. Lowest: Mike Marvin at $27,745. The largest reported value sets this scale at $11,233,507.
Cash on hand
The balance the campaign reported at the end of its coverage period.
Highest cash on hand: Pete Ricketts at $6,910,970. Lowest: Mike Marvin at $2,616. The largest reported value sets this scale at $6,910,970.
Direct PAC receipts
Money the campaign received from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.
Highest direct PAC receipts: Pete Ricketts at $1,639,815. Lowest: Mike Marvin at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $1,639,815.
Outside spending supporting
Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate, not coordinated with the campaign and never received by it.
Highest outside spending supporting: Dan Osborn at $820,705. Lowest: Mike Marvin at $61,084. The largest reported value sets this scale at $820,705.
Outside spending opposing
Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.
Highest outside spending opposing: Pete Ricketts at $782,111. Lowest: Mike Marvin at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $782,111.
Where each campaign's committee money came from
Each column is one candidate and each figure is that candidate's own money, taken over that candidate's own itemized total. Nothing here is added across candidates, and the two groupings below are never added to each other: the first is who the FEC says runs the giving committee, which covers every dollar, and the second is what interest a source says that committee advances, which is a claim MyRepTracker makes and covers only part of the money.
Contributions each campaign received, by who runs the committee
| Category | Pete Ricketts Republican | Dan Osborn Independent | Mike Marvin Legal Marijuana Now |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate PACs | $558,70039.5% | $0 | $0 |
| Leadership PACs | $307,75021.8% | $24,50018.9% | $0 |
| Trade association PACs | $245,50017.4% | $0 | $0 |
| Non-connected committees | $113,3588.0% | $15,23711.7% | $0 |
| Labor union PACs | $17,0001.2% | $80,50062.0% | $0 |
| Membership organization PACs | $79,3455.6% | $1,6501.3% | $0 |
| Other candidates' committees | $64,0004.5% | $8,0006.2% | $0 |
| Cooperative PACs | $16,5001.2% | $0 | $0 |
| Corporations without capital stock | $12,5000.9% | $0 | $0 |
| Itemized total | $1,414,653 | $129,887 | $0 |
Contributions each campaign received, by interest advanced
| Category | Pete Ricketts Republican | Dan Osborn Independent | Mike Marvin Legal Marijuana Now |
|---|---|---|---|
| Securities and investment Finance, insurance, and real estate | $111,00010.6% | $0 | $0 |
| Commercial banking Finance, insurance, and real estate | $81,5007.8% | $0 | $0 |
| Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate | $78,5007.5% | $0 | $0 |
| Agribusiness Agriculture | $67,0006.4% | $0 | $0 |
| Food and beverage Agriculture | $53,5005.1% | $0 | $0 |
| Technology Communications and technology | $42,5004.1% | $0 | $0 |
| Pharmaceuticals Health | $39,0003.7% | $0 | $0 |
| Building trades unions Labor | $10,0001.0% | $22,50023.1% | $0 |
| Public sector unions Labor | $2,5000.2% | $25,00025.7% | $0 |
| Construction Construction | $27,0002.6% | $0 | $0 |
| Automotive Transportation | $25,0002.4% | $0 | $0 |
| Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate | $25,0002.4% | $0 | $0 |
| Oil and gas Energy and natural resources | $23,5002.3% | $0 | $0 |
| Defense Defense | $21,7002.1% | $0 | $0 |
| Health insurance Health | $20,0001.9% | $0 | $0 |
| Trucking Transportation | $17,5001.7% | $0 | $0 |
| Electric utilities Energy and natural resources | $17,0001.6% | $0 | $0 |
| Industrial unions Labor | $0 | $15,00015.4% | $0 |
| Mining Energy and natural resources | $15,0001.4% | $0 | $0 |
| Telecommunications Communications and technology | $7,5000.7% | $5,0005.1% | $0 |
| Transportation unions Labor | $2,0000.2% | $10,00010.3% | $0 |
| Accounting Professional services | $10,0001.0% | $0 | $0 |
| Lawyers and law firms Professional services | $8,0000.8% | $1,0001.0% | $0 |
| Renewable energy Energy and natural resources | $8,5000.8% | $0 | $0 |
| Media and entertainment Communications and technology | $7,5000.7% | $0 | $0 |
| Air transport Transportation | $7,0000.7% | $0 | $0 |
| Hospitals and nursing homes Health | $5,0000.5% | $0 | $0 |
| Nurses and nursing specialties Health | $5,0000.5% | $0 | $0 |
| Physicians and medical specialties Health | $5,0000.5% | $0 | $0 |
| Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue | $5,0000.5% | $0 | $0 |
| Democracy and election reform Ideological and single-issue | $0 | $1,5001.5% | $0 |
| Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees | $371,750 | $32,500 | $0 |
| Committees not yet categorized | $295,20328.3% | $17,38717.9% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $1,414,653 | $129,887 | $0 |
Independent spending supporting each candidate, by who runs the committee
| Category | Pete Ricketts Republican | Dan Osborn Independent | Mike Marvin Legal Marijuana Now |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-connected committees | $769,292100.0% | $820,705100.0% | $61,084100.0% |
| Itemized total | $769,292 | $820,705 | $61,084 |
Independent spending supporting each candidate, by interest advanced
| Category | Pete Ricketts Republican | Dan Osborn Independent | Mike Marvin Legal Marijuana Now |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue | $419,29254.5% | $0 | $0 |
| Cryptocurrency and blockchain Finance, insurance, and real estate | $350,00045.5% | $0 | $0 |
| Committees not yet categorized | $0 | $820,705100.0% | $61,084100.0% |
| Itemized total | $769,292 | $820,705 | $61,084 |
Independent spending opposing each candidate, by who runs the committee
| Category | Pete Ricketts Republican | Dan Osborn Independent | Mike Marvin Legal Marijuana Now |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-connected committees | $782,111100.0% | $116,346100.0% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $782,111 | $116,346 | $0 |
Independent spending opposing each candidate, by interest advanced
| Category | Pete Ricketts Republican | Dan Osborn Independent | Mike Marvin Legal Marijuana Now |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue | $0 | $100,00086.0% | $0 |
| Committees not yet categorized | $782,111100.0% | $16,34614.0% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $782,111 | $116,346 | $0 |
Last-minute contributions reported before an election
Within 48 hours of receiving a contribution or loan of $1,000 or more in the days just before an election, a campaign must notify the FEC. These notices are provisional: the same money appears again in the regular report covering those days, so it is not added to the amounts above and is not compared as a measure. Candidates file them only while their own election is close, so an absence here says nothing about a campaign's fundraising.
| Candidate | Reported on notices | Notices | Covers | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dan Osborn Independent | $172,800 | 17 | Apr 23 to May 9, 2026 | Covered by regular reports |
| Mike Marvin Legal Marijuana Now | $17,100 | 3 | May 2 to May 6, 2026 | Covered by regular reports |
Candidates not compared
These candidates are left out of the comparison rather than shown as zero, because a missing or partial record is not the same as no money.
- Chuck Conboy (America First): This candidate is not linked to a federal candidate identity, so FEC coverage does not apply.
- Robin Richards (Nebraska Working People): This candidate is not linked to a federal candidate identity, so FEC coverage does not apply.
Direct contributions are money the campaign received. Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with any campaign, and are never added to a candidate's receipts. Source: Federal Election Commission ↗.