Pesticide applicators restricted use requirements modification
SF 99 modifies Minnesota's pesticide applicator licensing requirements to create a consistent exception for noncertified applicators who meet federal standards. The bill adds identical language to five sections of Minnesota law (18B.30, 18B.32, 18B.33, 18B.34, and 18B.36), stating that the licensing rules do not apply to noncertified applicators who satisfy Code of Federal Regulations Title 40, Section 171.201. This directly affects pesticide applicators who operate under federal guidelines but lack state certification. The key change is standardizing this federal exception across multiple statutes, reducing regulatory complexity for affected applicators. The bill does not alter the core requirement that restricted pesticides generally require state licensing.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 16, 2025
Last action Jan 16, 2025
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
2
Key actions
0
Committee
1
Jan 16, 2025
Committee
Referred to Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development
upper
Jan 16, 2025
Introduced
Introduction and first reading
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Steve Drazkowski
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SF 99
Scope: MN
Hi! I can help you understand SF 99. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline