Fleeing a peace officer in a motor vehicle crime modification
This bill modifies Minnesota's laws regarding fleeing a peace officer in a motor vehicle, specifically updating how deadly force is used during police pursuits and addressing civil liability. It clarifies that officers may use deadly force only when there is an immediate threat of death or great bodily harm to others, and it adds protections for individuals with disabilities who may struggle to understand or comply with officer commands. The legislation also grants peace officers immunity from criminal and civil liability for injuries or property damage caused during authorized pursuit interventions, while holding drivers who flee in multi-wheeled vehicles civilly liable if an intervention technique is used. These changes apply to crimes committed on or after August 1, 2026.
Bill status
died
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Mar 9, 2026
Last action Apr 7, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduction
→
1st Engrossment
·
4 edits
·
Mar 26, 2026
MODERATE
The bill was updated from its initial introduction to its first engrossment version, reflecting amendments made during the legislative process. The most significant substantive change is the removal of a specific exemption clause in Section 4, which previously stated that the result of an intervention technique could not be used as evidence of intent to harm. This deletion broadens the scope of civil liability for peace officers, allowing the outcome of their actions during a pursuit to be considered when determining if they intended to cause harm.
Scope change
The bill's scope regarding officer liability was expanded by removing a protective limitation on how evidence of intent is evaluated during police pursuits.
ENFORCEMENT
Deleted a clause preventing the use of intervention results as evidence of intent to harm, thereby allowing such results to be used in civil liability cases.
TIMELINE
Updated the bill title and section numbering to reflect its progression from 'Introduction' to '1st Engrossment'.
TECHNICAL
Removed references to Section 299D.03 regarding Minnesota State Patrol duties, indicating these provisions were addressed in a different bill or removed from this version.
REQUIREMENT
Simplified the language regarding officer immunity by removing the condition that immunity depends on whether the officer would have been immune under a specific subdivision.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
7
Key actions
0
Committee
3
Mar 26, 2026
Committee
Comm report: Amended, No recommendation, re-referred to Judiciary and Public Safety
upper
Mar 23, 2026
Committee
Withdrawn and re-referred to Transportation
upper
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Referred to Judiciary and Public Safety
upper
Mar 9, 2026
Introduced
Introduction and first reading
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
John Hoffman
DDemocratic-Farmer-Labor
Co
Carla Nelson
RRepublican
Co
Jeff Howe
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SF 4274
Scope: MN
Hi! I can help you understand SF 4274. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline