SF 2089 Minnesota Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Data practices modification

SF 2089 amends Minnesota law to improve how individuals can correct inaccurate or incomplete personal data held by government agencies. It directly affects Minnesota residents whose data is maintained by public entities, such as in driver's license records or health department files. The bill requires agencies to correct or destroy disputed data within 30 days of a written request or explain why the data is accurate, with a 60-day appeal option to the commissioner if unresolved. If data is successfully challenged, agencies must complete, correct, or destroy it without regard to other record retention rules, while keeping only a summary of the dispute for records. This creates a clear, time-bound process for individuals to fix errors in government-held information.
Bill status in committee 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Mar 3, 2025 Last action Mar 24, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

Introduction 1st Engrossment · 3 edits · Mar 24, 2025
MINOR
The bill has progressed from its initial introduction to its first engrossment, indicating it has been reviewed and amended by the legislature. The most significant substantive change is the restructuring of the appeal process for inaccurate data, which now lists three specific conditions under which an appeal cannot be made. This revision clarifies the rules for challenging data by explicitly including a scenario where the data subject was a party to a court proceeding involving that data.
Scope change
The scope of the bill remains focused on state government data practices, but the specific eligibility criteria for filing a data appeal have been modified to include an additional exclusion related to court proceedings.
REQUIREMENT

The list of conditions preventing a data appeal was reorganized and expanded. The previous item regarding the individual not being the subject of the data was moved to item (3), and a new item (2) was added stating that an appeal is barred if the data was previously presented as evidence in a court proceeding where the data subject was a party.

A previous condition stating that an appeal is barred if the commissioner has issued a final order regarding the disputed data in a prior appeal involving the same parties was removed from the list of exclusions.

TECHNICAL

The bill title and version header were updated to reflect the '1st Engrossment' status, and the posting date was changed from March 24, 2025, to June 11, 2025.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
3
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Mar 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
Comm report: To pass as amended and re-refer to State and Local Government
upper
Mar 3, 2025
Committee
Referred to Judiciary and Public Safety
upper
Mar 3, 2025
Introduced
Introduction and first reading
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Doron Clark
Doron Clark
DDemocratic-Farmer-Labor
MN
60