Minnesota Business Filing Fraud Prevention Act
The Minnesota Business Filing Fraud Prevention Act creates a process for reporting and removing fraudulent business filings. It allows a complainant (such as a business owner, employee, or person connected to a business) to submit a detailed report to the Secretary of State if they believe a filing was unauthorized and intended to alter business records or register a business using another person's identity. The Secretary of State notifies the business owner (filers) within 21 days to respond; if they fail to respond, the filing is automatically deemed fraudulent and removed. False statements in these reports are subject to criminal penalties under Minnesota law.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2025
Last action Mar 24, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduction
→
1st Engrossment
·
4 edits
·
Mar 24, 2025
MODERATE
The bill was updated from its initial introduction to its first engrossment, reflecting amendments made during the legislative process. Key substantive changes include expanding the definition of fraudulent filings to cover modifications to business governance, clarifying that the office's fraud remedy is not exclusive and allowing direct court action, and restructuring data privacy rules to allow broader dissemination of information for investigations. Additionally, the definition of prohibited 'solicitation' was broadened from specific mail/email methods to any communication from a third party.
Scope change
The bill's scope was expanded to include 'governance' as a factor in fraudulent filings and to allow aggrieved parties to bypass the administrative process and go directly to district court.
DEFINITION
Added 'governance' to the list of business information that can be altered with fraudulent intent.
Broadened the definition of 'solicitation' from specific mail or email documents to any communication sent by a nongovernment third party.
REQUIREMENT
Clarified that the administrative fraud remedy is not exclusive, permitting aggrieved parties to seek immediate action in district court.
Restructured data classification rules to explicitly permit the office to share data with the attorney general and other agencies for investigations.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
4
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Mar 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
Comm report: To pass as amended and re-refer to State and Local Government
upper
Feb 20, 2025
Committee
Referred to Judiciary and Public Safety
upper
Feb 20, 2025
Introduced
Introduction and first reading
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Matt Klein
DDemocratic-Farmer-Labor
Co
Ron Latz
DDemocratic-Farmer-Labor
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SF 1734
Scope: MN
Hi! I can help you understand SF 1734. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline