Sharing and protection of data accessed by a prosecuting authority provided, and criminal penalties imposed.
HF 962 prevents state, county, or municipal law enforcement agencies from disciplining or threatening to discipline peace officers solely because they are listed on a "Brady-Giglio list" (a prosecutor's designation for officers who failed to disclose exculpatory evidence in a case). The bill creates a task force composed of law enforcement representatives, prosecutors, judges, and court officials to examine how these lists are used and recommend improvements. The task force must report its findings and recommendations to the legislature by December 1, 2025. This bill directly affects Minnesota peace officers and aims to clarify due process protections around these disciplinary lists.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2025
Last action Apr 22, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
1st Engrossment
→
2nd Engrossment
·
5 edits
·
Apr 22, 2026
MODERATE
The bill was updated from the 1st to the 2nd engrossment, expanding its scope to explicitly include criminal penalties and clarifying the sharing and protection of data accessed by prosecuting authorities. Key substantive changes include adding new sections to define how public employers must share personnel data with prosecutors, establishing strict rules for retaining or destroying that data, and creating a misdemeanor penalty for failing to protect sensitive information. The bill also clarifies definitions regarding 'Brady-Giglio material' and updates the effective date to February 1, 2027.
Scope change
The bill's scope was expanded to include explicit criminal penalties for non-compliance and detailed procedures for sharing and protecting personnel data between public employers and prosecuting authorities.
REQUIREMENT
Added new requirements for public employers to grant limited access to personnel data when requested by a prosecuting authority for Brady-Giglio purposes.
Established new rules requiring prosecuting authorities to retain only relevant Brady-Giglio material and to destroy or redact non-relevant data.
ENFORCEMENT
Created a new misdemeanor penalty for recipients of Brady-Giglio material who fail to protect the data from improper disclosure.
DEFINITION
Updated definitions of 'Brady-Giglio material' and 'not public data' to include the phrase 'or information' and clarified their usage within the section.
TIMELINE
Added an effective date of February 1, 2027, with a provision allowing authorities to adopt policies before that date.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
5
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Apr 22, 2026
Committee
Joint rule 2.03, Deadlines, re-referred to Rules and Legislative Administration
lower
Apr 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
Committee report, to adopt as amended and re-refer to Ways and Means
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
Committee report, to adopt as amended and re-refer to Judiciary Finance and Civil Law
lower
Feb 17, 2025
Introduced
Introduction and first reading, referred to Public Safety Finance and Policy
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Paul Novotny
RRepublican
Co
Dan Wolgamott
DDemocratic-Farmer-Labor
Co
Jeff Witte
RRepublican
Co
Kristin Robbins
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HF 962
Scope: MN
Hi! I can help you understand HF 962. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline