Trespass law modified to allow purple markings.
HF 944 amends Minnesota's trespass law to allow landowners to use purple paint markings as a legal alternative to traditional "no trespassing" signs for restricting outdoor recreation on their property. The bill specifies that purple markings must be vertical lines (at least 8 inches long, 1 inch wide) placed 3-5 feet from the ground, spaced no more than 100 feet apart on forest land or 1,000 feet apart elsewhere. This directly affects landowners seeking to manage recreational access and users who might enter marked areas without permission. The change provides a standardized, visible method for landowners to communicate trespass restrictions without requiring physical signs.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2025
Last action Mar 20, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduction
→
1st Engrossment
·
3 edits
·
Mar 3, 2025
MINOR
The bill has moved from its initial introduction to its first engrossment, indicating it has passed its first reading and undergone review. The most significant substantive change is the addition of two new sections (2.29 and 2.30) and a major modification to the marking requirements. The updated language now explicitly requires property owners to post annual signs at access points before placing purple paint marks on trees or posts, adding a procedural step to the existing notification process.
Scope change
The bill's scope has expanded by adding two new sections, though their specific content is not detailed in the provided text. The applicability of the marking requirements has been clarified to include a mandatory annual sign-posting event at access roads and trails.
REQUIREMENT
Added two new sections (2.29 and 2.30) to the bill, introducing new provisions not present in the original version.
Modified the marking requirements to mandate that property owners must first post signs meeting specific criteria at all access roads and trails annually before placing purple paint marks on trees or posts.
TECHNICAL
Updated the document title and posting date to reflect the bill's progression to its first engrossment stage.
Floor votes · House Mar 17, 2025
How they voted
130–1
Passed
Total votes 131
Mar 17, 2025
D
Democratic64
100% Yea
R
Republican67
98% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
10
Key actions
2
Committee
2
Mar 20, 2025
Committee
Referred to Environment, Climate, and Legacy
upper
Mar 20, 2025
Introduced
Introduction and first reading
upper
Mar 20, 2025
Introduced
Received from House
upper
Mar 17, 2025
Lower · Passed
Bill was passed
lower
Mar 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
Committee report, to adopt as amended
lower
Feb 17, 2025
Introduced
Introduction and first reading, referred to Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy
lower
1 primary · 6 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HF 944
Scope: MN
Hi! I can help you understand HF 944. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline