Election judge employment status clarified.
HF 637 clarifies that election judges in Minnesota are not considered employees of the local government body (like a county) that appoints them. The bill specifically prohibits appointing authorities from requiring election judges to meet employment conditions unrelated to their election duties, such as background checks or training typically required for permanent staff. This directly affects election judges and local election officials who appoint them. The bill amends Minnesota law to prevent local governments from imposing unnecessary employment rules on temporary election judges.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2025
Last action Feb 13, 2025
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
1
Key actions
0
Committee
0
Feb 13, 2025
Introduced
Introduction and first reading, referred to Elections Finance and Government Operations
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Pam Altendorf
RRepublican
Co
Ben Davis
RRepublican
Co
Duane Quam
RRepublican
Co
Jimmy Gordon
RRepublican
Co
Joe McDonald
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HF 637
Scope: MN
Hi! I can help you understand HF 637. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline