Home Maryland Elections 2022 Neil Parrott

Neil Parrott

Republican candidate · 2022 general election · Maryland

NP

Neil Parrott

Republican

Races

Campaign finance

FEC data through Dec 31, 2022. Covering the 2022 two-year cycle only.

The 2022 cycle at a glance

Total receipts
$1,126,116
Everything the campaign took in
Individual contributions
$1,019,931
Itemized and unitemized split not reported
PAC and other committees
$32,675
Received from political committees
Campaign spending
$1,187,688
Total disbursements
Cash on hand
$55,054
At the end of the reporting period

Where the money came from

These categories divide total receipts of $1,126,116 exactly once, so they add back up to the reported total.

Receipts by funding category for the 2022 cycle
SourceAmountShare of receipts
Individual contributions$1,019,93190.6%
PAC and other committee contributions$32,6752.9%
Party committee contributions$9,0000.8%
Candidate self-funding$00.0%
Loans$00.0%
Other receipts, including transfers$64,5105.7%
Total receipts$1,126,116100%

Financial position

Cash, debt, refunds, loans, and transfers as reported through Dec 31, 2022 for the 2022 cycle. These are factual reported values, not a judgement about whether a campaign is healthy, viable, or strong. Independent expenditures are never added to or subtracted from any of them: that money was never the campaign's.

Reported financial position for the 2022 cycle
MeasureAmount
Cash on hand at coverage end$55,054
Debts and obligations owed by the committee$43,352
Debts and obligations owed to the committeeNot reported
Contributions refunded to individuals$1,980
Contributions refunded to committees$0
Transfers received from other authorized committeesAlready raised money moving between the candidate's own committees, not new fundraising.$33,106
Transfers made to other authorized committees$15,996
Repayments of candidate loans$0
Repayments of other loans$0

Calculated from the reported values

Each row below is arithmetic MyRepTracker performed on the values above. Where the FEC published the figure itself, the row says so and no calculation was made.

Values calculated from the reported financial position, with the formula for each
MeasureAmountHow it was produced
Contributions net of refunds$1,059,626Calculated as individual + committee + party + candidate contributions, minus contributions refunded to individuals and committees.
Operating expenditures net of offsetsNot reportedAn input this calculation needs is not published by the source behind this record.
Outstanding candidate loans$0Calculated as loans received from the candidate minus repayments of those loans.
Other outstanding loans$0Calculated as other loans received minus repayments of those loans.
Total contributions refunded$1,980Calculated as refunds to individuals plus refunds to committees.

Change since the previous filing

Both columns come from committee C00691931, so the two periods are comparable. A change is the difference between what 30G 2022 reported and what YE 2022 reported, and the direction is stated in words rather than shown only as a sign. 30G 2022 reported through Nov 28, 2022 and YE 2022 through Dec 31, 2022.

Financial position at the two most recent controlling filings of committee C00691931
Measure30G 2022Reported through Nov 28, 2022YE 2022Reported through Dec 31, 2022Change
Cash on hand at period end$89,201$53,951Down $35,251
Debts owed by the committee$65,037$43,352Down $21,685
Contribution refunds in the period$65$25Down $40

Cash compared with one period's spending

Cash on hand of $55,054 set beside the $71,324 this campaign spent during YE 2022, through Dec 31, 2022, which is 0.8 times that period's spending. This is a ratio between two reported numbers over one named period. It is not a forecast of how long the money will last, and campaigns do not spend evenly across a cycle.

Outside spending

Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with the campaign. This money was never received or controlled by Neil Parrott. Supporting and opposing spending are kept apart rather than combined into one number, and neither is added to campaign receipts.

Spent supporting

$6,511
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

Spent opposing

$0
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

What the money was spent on

These spending categories were produced by taxonomy spend-1.2 and the current rules are spend-1.3, so they are withheld until this record is refreshed.

Political committees that contributed directly

Money received by the authorized campaign committee from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.

This total will usually differ from the PAC figure in the summary above. The summary is what the campaign reported receiving in total; this ranking adds up the individual contributions that were itemized, which is a different record made at a different time. Neither is a correction of the other, and the gap is not an error in either one.

These two records disagree by an unusually large amount. Political committees report giving $84,700, while this campaign reports receiving $32,675 from committees. Both figures come from the FEC. The ranking below is what the giving committees filed, and the summary above is what the campaign filed; MyRepTracker does not know which is the better record of this money and does not adjust either one.

Top 5 of 31 shown $84,700 total · $31,000 shown here

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Aug 16, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Political committees ranked by direct contributions
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1HUCK PAC C00448373$10,00011.8%2Aug 12, 2022
2CITIZENS UNITED POLITICAL VICTORY FUND C00295527$6,0007.1%3Sep 26, 2022
3ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ABC PAC) C00010421$5,0005.9%1Oct 31, 2022
4CPAC ACTION PAC C00130658$5,0005.9%1Aug 17, 2022
5NATIONAL PRO-LIFE ALLIANCE PAC C00358051$5,0005.9%1Oct 20, 2022
Show the complete list of 31 committees →

Organizations spending independently

Supporting Neil Parrott

All 2 shown $6,511 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Aug 16, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Organizations ranked by independent spending supporting this candidate
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1HOUSE FREEDOM FUND C00552851$3,27650.3%6Oct 26, 2022
2NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE VICTORY FUND C00509893$3,23549.7%1Oct 19, 2022

Opposing Neil Parrott

No opposing independent expenditures are reported for this cycle.

What that outside spending purchased

Each independent expenditure carries a short description the spending committee wrote, and these categories are those descriptions sorted under taxonomy outside-1.0. Spending supporting Neil Parrott and spending opposing them are broken down separately and never combined, and every share below is a share of that one direction's total.

The largest category is usually "Advertising, medium not specified". That is not a leftover: it is spending the committee described only as a media buy or as advertising, without saying whether it aired on television, ran online, or arrived in the mail. MyRepTracker reports what was filed rather than assigning it a medium.

Supporting Neil Parrott

Independent spending supporting this candidate, by reported purpose for the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
PurposeAmount% ShareTransactions
Direct mail $3,23549.7%1
Digital and online advertising $1,21918.7%1
Phone calls and text messages $1,21818.7%1
Fundraising and donation processing $84012.9%4
Classified$6,511100.0%
Unclassified filing descriptions$00.0%
Total independent spending$6,511100%7

Opposing Neil Parrott

No independent expenditures in this direction are reported for this cycle.

Who the committees behind this money were

Every committee here is placed by the registration it filed with the FEC for the 2022 cycle: its designation, its committee type, and the organizational form it reported. That is the FEC's own record and involves no judgement by MyRepTracker, so this covers every itemized dollar. A committee's registration can change between cycles, and each cycle is judged by its own.

Contributed to Neil Parrott

Committees itemized $84,700 in contributions to this campaign.

This campaign's own reports put contributions from all political committees at $32,675, against the $84,700 itemized above. The two figures come from opposite sides of the same transactions and do not always agree. Every share below is of what MyRepTracker can add up, which is the itemized figure.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Leadership PACs $25,50030.1%1011
Non-connected committees $23,00027.2%67
Membership organization PACs $20,70024.4%612
Other candidates' committees $8,0009.4%55
Trade association PACs $6,0007.1%22
Corporations without capital stock $1,0001.2%11
Corporate PACs $5000.6%11
Itemized total for this direction$84,700

Spent supporting Neil Parrott

Committees itemized $6,511 in independent spending supporting Neil Parrott.

Independent spenders supporting this candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Leadership PACs $3,27650.3%16
Non-connected committees $3,23549.7%11
Itemized total for this direction$6,511

What interests those committees advance

The FEC publishes no industry or interest field, so unlike the section above this one is a claim MyRepTracker makes. A committee is placed here only when there is a document behind the claim that a reader can open: its own statement of organization, its own published mission statement, or a named third party. Every assignment carries that document on the committee's own page. A committee's name is never evidence of anything.

Categorized is not the same as reviewed. Most of these sectors were assigned by machine from the committee's own filing rather than read by a person. Each committee's own page says which of the two its assignment is, and names the document behind it either way.

Coverage is partial on purpose, and the part that is not covered is shown at full size rather than left out. Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees are excluded outright: their giving is an officeholder's or a party's decision, so no interest label describes it. Categories are taxonomy interest-1.7.

Contributed to Neil Parrott

Committees itemized $84,700 in contributions to this campaign. $33,500 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $51,200, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $6,000 and committees not yet categorized account for $45,200.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Construction Construction $5,0009.8%11
Food and beverage Agriculture $1,0002.0%11
Committees not yet categorized $45,20088.3%1421
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. $33,500Not applicable1516
Base the shares are taken over$51,200100%
Itemized total for this direction$84,700

Spent supporting Neil Parrott

Committees itemized $6,511 in independent spending supporting Neil Parrott. $3,276 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $3,235, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $0 and committees not yet categorized account for $3,235.

Independent spenders supporting this candidate, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. $3,276Not applicable16
Committees not yet categorized $3,235100.0%11
Base the shares are taken over$3,235100%
Itemized total for this direction$6,511

Last-minute contributions reported before an election

In the days just before an election, a campaign must tell the FEC within 48 hours about any contribution or loan of $1,000 or more. These notices arrive faster than the regular reporting schedule, and the same money is reported again in the report covering those days. Nothing here is added to receipts: it is a preview of money the ordinary reports will carry, not money beside them.

Reported on notices

$69,900
Across 9 notices, received Jul 13, 2022 to Nov 5, 2022

Still only provisional

$28,700
2 notices no stored regular report covers yet

The most recent notice was filed on Nov 8, 2022. A notice stops being the only record of its money once a regular report covers the same days; those are marked reconciled below and the amounts appear in Neil Parrott's reported totals through the ordinary schedule.

48-hour notices filed for the 2022 cycle, newest first
FiledAmountEntriesCoversStateFiling
Nov 8, 2022$9,9004Oct 27 to Nov 5, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Nov 3, 2022$3,9002Nov 2 to Nov 2, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Nov 3, 2022$1,0001Nov 2 to Nov 2, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Nov 2, 2022$11,5006Nov 2 to Nov 2, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 27, 2022$5,1002Oct 20 to Oct 20, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 26, 2022$12,90011Oct 19 to Oct 26, 2022ProvisionalFEC filing ↗
Oct 26, 2022$2,9001Oct 26 to Oct 26, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 25, 2022$15,80010Oct 10 to Oct 23, 2022ProvisionalFEC filing ↗
Jul 14, 2022$6,9004Jul 13 to Jul 13, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗

Where the individual money was reported from

Contributions from individuals that the campaign itemized, grouped by the state each contributor gave as their address. Contributions of $200 or less in aggregate are not itemized and carry no address, so they are not here at all. These places account for $610,983 of the $1,053,037 this campaign reported from individuals and from transfers by its other authorized committees, across 1,464 itemized contributions.

From Maryland

$462,289
76.0% of the itemized money that has a place

From everywhere else

$145,832
24.0% of the itemized money that has a place

Money from outside Maryland is not money from outside the country, and neither figure is evidence that anything unlawful happened. People may contribute to campaigns in states they do not live in, and United States citizens living abroad may contribute at all.

What kind of place it came from

Itemized individual contributions by kind of place, 2022 cycle
Kind of placeAmountContributionsShare
States and the District of ColumbiaContributors who gave an address in one of the fifty states or the District of Columbia.$608,1211,459100.0%
Not placedContributions the FEC could not attribute to a place. They are reported here and are never assigned to a state or counted in the in-state and out-of-state split.$2,8625Not counted

Places, largest first

Top 10 of 38 places shown as bars. Every place is in the table below.

  • Maryland this campaign's state $462,289
  • Florida $27,600
  • California $22,745
  • Virginia $16,825
  • Texas $8,585
  • New Mexico $7,850
  • Pennsylvania $7,200
  • New York $6,400
  • Illinois $5,975
  • Alaska $5,000
Every place with itemized individual contributions reported for the 2022 cycle
PlaceAmountContributionsShare
Maryland this campaign's state$462,2891,26976.0%
Florida$27,600244.5%
California$22,745253.7%
Virginia$16,825192.8%
Texas$8,585101.4%
New Mexico$7,85051.3%
Pennsylvania$7,200131.2%
New York$6,40071.1%
Illinois$5,975101.0%
Alaska$5,00010.8%
New Jersey$4,60380.8%
Massachusetts$3,80060.6%
District of Columbia$2,95060.5%
Delaware$2,90010.5%
Not reported not placed$2,8625Not counted
Oklahoma$2,65060.4%
Kansas$2,50030.4%
Ohio$2,00030.3%
Arizona$1,85030.3%
Georgia$1,50040.2%
Oregon$1,30020.2%
Idaho$1,25020.2%
Indiana$1,25020.2%
Missouri$1,25020.2%
Alabama$1,00010.2%
Minnesota$84050.1%
Washington$80020.1%
Connecticut$75020.1%
Kentucky$75020.1%
Wisconsin$75020.1%
West Virginia$75060.1%
Michigan$50020.1%
South Carolina$50010.1%
Wyoming$50010.1%
Colorado$2501<0.1%
North Carolina$2501<0.1%
Utah$1091<0.1%
North Dakota$1001<0.1%
Reported with a place$608,1211,459100%

Contributions are transactions, not people: one contributor giving every month is counted once for each contribution. No contributor's name, address, employer, or occupation is stored or shown anywhere on this site.

  • $2,862 could not be attributed to a place and is left out of the in-state and out-of-state figures rather than assigned to a state.

How this compares

Compared with U.S. House campaigns in Maryland, 2022 cycle: 20 campaigns with a complete Federal Election Commission record for the cycle. This is a position in that group, not a score, a grade, or a judgement about the campaign.

Total receipts

Everything the authorized campaign committee took in for this cycle, including contributions, loans, and transfers.

  • This campaign $1,126,116
  • Cohort median $501,682
Total receipts for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Maryland, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$1,126,116
Lowest in the cohort-$36,839
25th percentile$57,741
Median$501,682
75th percentile$1,126,116
Highest in the cohort$13,144,029
Campaigns counted20

14 of the 20 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 70th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Share of receipts from political committees

Direct contributions from PACs and other political committees as a share of total receipts. Campaigns reporting no receipts at all have no share and are left out of this measure.

  • This campaign 2.9%
  • Cohort median 4.3%
Share of receipts from political committees for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Maryland, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign2.9%
Lowest in the cohort0.0%
25th percentile0.1%
Median4.3%
75th percentile24.4%
Highest in the cohort63.6%
Campaigns counted18

8 of the 18 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 44th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Cash on hand

The balance reported at the end of the coverage period. Campaigns report at different times, so this compares balances as of each campaign's own coverage end.

  • This campaign $55,054
  • Cohort median $31,911
Cash on hand for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Maryland, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$55,054
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$476
Median$31,911
75th percentile$591,429
Highest in the cohort$3,120,998
Campaigns counted20

10 of the 20 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 50th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending supporting

Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate. This money was never received or controlled by the campaign.

  • This campaign $6,511
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending supporting for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Maryland, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$6,511
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$6,511
Campaigns counted20

19 of the 20 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 95th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending opposing

Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.

  • This campaign $0
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending opposing for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Maryland, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$0
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$23,629
Campaigns counted20

0 of the 20 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 0th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Every comparison is drawn from one two-year cycle and one office. Only campaigns whose FEC record for that cycle is complete are counted; the rest are reported beside the cohort and are never counted as zero. One authorized committee is counted once however many candidacies report it, so where a candidate's committees are all reported by another FEC record, that record supplies the figures for both. A campaign is never compared with another cycle, with a career total, or with a candidate for a different office.

What these numbers mean

Receipts are not the same as contributions
Total receipts include everything the campaign took in, such as contributions, loans, and transfers. Contributions are only the money given by people and committees.
Direct contributions are not outside spending
A direct contribution is money received by the campaign's own authorized committee. An independent expenditure is money another organization spent on its own, without coordinating with the campaign. The Federal Election Commission treats these as different activities, and so does this page.
The organizations named here are political committees
Direct rankings count what one political committee gave to a campaign; outside-spending rankings count what a committee spent independently. A separate conduit section groups individual contributions only when the campaign's memo record supplies a registered conduit committee's FEC ID. It never attributes donors to employers or interest groups, and it never exposes contributor names. Sites using broader attribution rules may therefore report different organization totals.
A cycle may be only partly reported
Filings arrive throughout a two-year cycle. A current cycle shows only what has been filed and processed through the coverage date shown above, so it is not comparable with a finished cycle.
This view is cycle specific
It covers the 2022 two-year cycle only.

Source: Federal Election Commission ↗. MyRepTracker ingests FEC records directly and does not add its own influence, risk, or corruption score.