John H. Rutherford
U.S. House District 5
2026 general election.
Incumbents
Challengers
Campaign finance
Federal Election Commission filings for the 2026 two-year cycle. Candidates appear in the order they are listed on this page. They are not ranked by money, and these measures are never combined into a single score.
Every candidate below reports through Jul 29, 2026.
| Candidate | Total receipts | Cash on hand | Direct PAC receipts |
|---|---|---|---|
| John H. Rutherford Republican incumbent | $726,727 | $268,730 | $452,500 |
| Rachel Grage Democratic | $272,423 | $90,533 | $0 |
Each measure below has its own scale and starts at zero, so bars can be read against each other within a measure but not across measures. Every figure is reported through Jul 29, 2026.
Total receipts
Everything the authorized campaign committee took in, including contributions, loans, and transfers.
Highest total receipts: John H. Rutherford at $726,727. Lowest: Rachel Grage at $272,423. The largest reported value sets this scale at $726,727.
Cash on hand
The balance the campaign reported at the end of its coverage period.
Highest cash on hand: John H. Rutherford at $268,730. Lowest: Rachel Grage at $90,533. The largest reported value sets this scale at $268,730.
Direct PAC receipts
Money the campaign received from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.
Highest direct PAC receipts: John H. Rutherford at $452,500. Lowest: Rachel Grage at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $452,500.
Outside spending supporting
Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate, not coordinated with the campaign and never received by it.
Every compared candidate reported $0 for outside spending supporting. The largest reported value sets this scale at $0.
Outside spending opposing
Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.
Every compared candidate reported $0 for outside spending opposing. The largest reported value sets this scale at $0.
Where each campaign's committee money came from
Each column is one candidate and each figure is that candidate's own money, taken over that candidate's own itemized total. Nothing here is added across candidates, and the two groupings below are never added to each other: the first is who the FEC says runs the giving committee, which covers every dollar, and the second is what interest a source says that committee advances, which is a claim MyRepTracker makes and covers only part of the money.
Contributions each campaign received, by who runs the committee
| Category | John H. Rutherford Republican |
|---|---|
| Corporate PACs | $312,00060.6% |
| Trade association PACs | $97,50018.9% |
| Non-connected committees | $29,5005.7% |
| Leadership PACs | $28,0005.4% |
| Membership organization PACs | $23,0004.5% |
| Labor union PACs | $8,5001.7% |
| Corporations without capital stock | $7,5001.5% |
| Cooperative PACs | $5,0001.0% |
| Other candidates' committees | $4,0000.8% |
| Itemized total | $515,000 |
Contributions each campaign received, by interest advanced
| Category | John H. Rutherford Republican |
|---|---|
| Defense Defense | $99,50020.6% |
| Technology Communications and technology | $35,0007.2% |
| Air transport Transportation | $33,5006.9% |
| Food and beverage Agriculture | $26,0005.4% |
| Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate | $26,0005.4% |
| Automotive Transportation | $15,0003.1% |
| Mining Energy and natural resources | $12,5002.6% |
| Telecommunications Communications and technology | $10,0002.1% |
| Agribusiness Agriculture | $9,5002.0% |
| Construction Construction | $8,5001.8% |
| Pharmaceuticals Health | $7,0001.4% |
| Pro-Israel Ideological and single-issue | $6,0001.2% |
| Trucking Transportation | $6,0001.2% |
| Credit unions Finance, insurance, and real estate | $5,0001.0% |
| Electric utilities Energy and natural resources | $5,0001.0% |
| Transportation unions Labor | $5,0001.0% |
| Commercial banking Finance, insurance, and real estate | $4,5000.9% |
| Physicians and medical specialties Health | $3,0000.6% |
| Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate | $2,5000.5% |
| Oil and gas Energy and natural resources | $1,0000.2% |
| Securities and investment Finance, insurance, and real estate | $1,0000.2% |
| Committees not yet categorized | $161,50033.4% |
| Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees | $32,000 |
| Itemized total | $515,000 |
These candidates are compared in the table above but have no stored breakdown of where their committee money came from, so they are named here rather than shown as a column of zeroes.
- Rachel Grage: no breakdown is stored for this record yet
Last-minute contributions reported before an election
Within 48 hours of receiving a contribution or loan of $1,000 or more in the days just before an election, a campaign must notify the FEC. These notices are provisional: the same money appears again in the regular report covering those days, so it is not added to the amounts above and is not compared as a measure. Candidates file them only while their own election is close, so an absence here says nothing about a campaign's fundraising.
| Candidate | Reported on notices | Notices | Covers | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John H. Rutherford Republican | $71,300 | 5 | Aug 5 to Aug 18, 2026 | $71,300 still provisional |
| Rachel Grage Democratic | $2,000 | 1 | Aug 15 to Aug 15, 2026 | $2,000 still provisional |
Direct contributions are money the campaign received. Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with any campaign, and are never added to a candidate's receipts. Source: Federal Election Commission ↗.