Scott Franklin
U.S. House District 18
2026 general election.
Incumbents
Challengers
Campaign finance
Federal Election Commission filings for the 2026 two-year cycle. Candidates appear in the order they are listed on this page. They are not ranked by money, and these measures are never combined into a single score.
Every candidate below reports through Jun 30, 2026, except where a row says otherwise.
| Candidate | Total receipts | Cash on hand | Direct PAC receipts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Franklin Republican FEC data through Jul 29, 2026 incumbent | $850,000 | $960,764 | $377,500 |
| Curtis Gibson Democratic | $12,208 | $1,452 | $0 |
| Deva Simmons Independent | $21,932 | $5,764 | $5,000 |
Each measure below has its own scale and starts at zero, so bars can be read against each other within a measure but not across measures. Each candidate's own coverage end date is in the table above.
Total receipts
Everything the authorized campaign committee took in, including contributions, loans, and transfers.
Highest total receipts: Scott Franklin at $850,000. Lowest: Curtis Gibson at $12,208. The largest reported value sets this scale at $850,000.
Cash on hand
The balance the campaign reported at the end of its coverage period.
Highest cash on hand: Scott Franklin at $960,764. Lowest: Curtis Gibson at $1,452. The largest reported value sets this scale at $960,764.
Direct PAC receipts
Money the campaign received from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.
Highest direct PAC receipts: Scott Franklin at $377,500. Lowest: Curtis Gibson at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $377,500.
Outside spending supporting
Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate, not coordinated with the campaign and never received by it.
Every compared candidate reported $0 for outside spending supporting. The largest reported value sets this scale at $0.
Outside spending opposing
Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.
Every compared candidate reported $0 for outside spending opposing. The largest reported value sets this scale at $0.
Where each campaign's committee money came from
Each column is one candidate and each figure is that candidate's own money, taken over that candidate's own itemized total. Nothing here is added across candidates, and the two groupings below are never added to each other: the first is who the FEC says runs the giving committee, which covers every dollar, and the second is what interest a source says that committee advances, which is a claim MyRepTracker makes and covers only part of the money.
Contributions each campaign received, by who runs the committee
| Category | Scott Franklin Republican | Deva Simmons Independent |
|---|---|---|
| Corporate PACs | $195,00049.0% | $0 |
| Trade association PACs | $67,08616.9% | $0 |
| Leadership PACs | $43,50010.9% | $0 |
| Membership organization PACs | $28,5007.2% | $5,000100.0% |
| Non-connected committees | $30,5007.7% | $0 |
| Other candidates' committees | $11,5002.9% | $0 |
| Corporations without capital stock | $8,5002.1% | $0 |
| Cooperative PACs | $7,0001.8% | $0 |
| Labor union PACs | $6,0001.5% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $397,586 | $5,000 |
Contributions each campaign received, by interest advanced
| Category | Scott Franklin Republican | Deva Simmons Independent |
|---|---|---|
| Defense Defense | $73,00021.3% | $0 |
| Food and beverage Agriculture | $51,00014.9% | $0 |
| Technology Communications and technology | $22,5006.6% | $0 |
| Construction Construction | $21,5006.3% | $0 |
| Air transport Transportation | $17,0005.0% | $0 |
| Automotive Transportation | $10,0002.9% | $0 |
| Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate | $10,0002.9% | $0 |
| Agribusiness Agriculture | $8,5862.5% | $0 |
| Electric utilities Energy and natural resources | $7,0002.0% | $0 |
| Oil and gas Energy and natural resources | $5,5001.6% | $0 |
| Accounting Professional services | $5,0001.5% | $0 |
| Commercial banking Finance, insurance, and real estate | $5,0001.5% | $0 |
| Pro-Israel Ideological and single-issue | $5,0001.5% | $0 |
| Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate | $5,0001.5% | $0 |
| Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue | $3,5001.0% | $0 |
| Transportation unions Labor | $3,5001.0% | $0 |
| Nurses and nursing specialties Health | $2,5000.7% | $0 |
| Physicians and medical specialties Health | $2,5000.7% | $0 |
| Lawyers and law firms Professional services | $2,0000.6% | $0 |
| Telecommunications Communications and technology | $1,0000.3% | $0 |
| Trucking Transportation | $1,0000.3% | $0 |
| Committees not yet categorized | $80,50023.5% | $5,000100.0% |
| Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees | $55,000 | $0 |
| Itemized total | $397,586 | $5,000 |
These candidates are compared in the table above but have no stored breakdown of where their committee money came from, so they are named here rather than shown as a column of zeroes.
- Curtis Gibson: no breakdown is stored for this record yet
Last-minute contributions reported before an election
Within 48 hours of receiving a contribution or loan of $1,000 or more in the days just before an election, a campaign must notify the FEC. These notices are provisional: the same money appears again in the regular report covering those days, so it is not added to the amounts above and is not compared as a measure. Candidates file them only while their own election is close, so an absence here says nothing about a campaign's fundraising.
| Candidate | Reported on notices | Notices | Covers | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Franklin Republican | $10,000 | 3 | Jul 30 to Aug 11, 2026 | $10,000 still provisional |
Direct contributions are money the campaign received. Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with any campaign, and are never added to a candidate's receipts. Source: Federal Election Commission ↗.