HR 6633 United States House · 119th Congress

High-Capacity Grid Act

This bill requires public utilities to use the most efficient and high-capacity power line conductors available when building new transmission lines or making major upgrades to existing lines under federal jurisdiction. It creates a legal presumption that costs for these "best-available" conductors will be approved in rate cases, while costs for less efficient conductors will likely be denied. The rule applies only to projects overseen by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). FERC must issue specific rules within 180 days to define what qualifies as a "best-available" conductor based on capacity, efficiency, and thermal performance.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2025
Committee Review
Sep 2026
House Passage
Sep 2026
Senate Passage
President
Introduced Dec 11, 2025 Last action Sep 16, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

Introduced in House → Engrossed in House · 8 edits · Sep 15, 2026
MODERATE
The Engrossed version of HR 6633 substantially restructures the best-available transmission conductor requirement. It shifts from a standard-based framework with cost-recovery presumptions to a class-designation system with explicit exemptions, narrows the scope of covered projects by requiring modifications to be 'major' as determined by FERC, replaces a specific thermal-sag criterion with a broader mechanical performance standard, and removes the financial penalty structure that presumed non-compliant conductors were imprudent.
Scope change
Scope narrowed in two ways: (1) only 'major' modifications as determined by FERC are covered rather than any modification, and (2) four new exemptions carve out pre-enactment projects, emergencies, safety/reliability conflicts, and cost-inefficient applications. The overall effect is a less aggressive mandate with more flexibility for utilities.
SCOPE

Covered projects now require modifications to be 'major (as determined by the Commission)' rather than any modification, upgrade, replacement, or reconductoring. New construction must also specifically include a transmission conductor. This narrows which projects are subject to the requirement.

ENFORCEMENT

Two cost-recovery presumptions were removed: the presumption that best-available conductors are prudent and their costs just/reasonable, and the presumption that non-best-available conductors are not prudent and their costs not just/reasonable. This eliminates the financial incentive/penalty structure.

ELIGIBILITY

Four new exemptions were added where the requirement does not apply: (1) projects with permits already filed or conductors already procured before enactment, (2) emergency replacement after natural disasters or terrorism, (3) situations where use would negatively impact safety or violate reliability standards, and (4) situations where use would significantly increase cost per kWh without a material increase in capacity, efficiency, or mechanical performance.

DEFINITION

The criterion 'mitigates thermal sag at the maximum rated transmission-carrying capacity' was replaced with 'provide the greatest feasible and commercially available level of mechanical performance, taking into account relevant factors, including reliability, safety, and affordability.' This is a broader, less specific standard.

TIMELINE

The rulemaking deadline was extended from 180 days after enactment to 1 year after enactment for FERC to issue regulations.

REQUIREMENT

New requirement that FERC establish its methodology 'in consultation with the Secretary of Energy,' adding an interagency coordination step not present in the original.

New filing requirements for public utilities to demonstrate compliance, including project-specific impact data as determined necessary by FERC.

TECHNICAL

The provision was moved from a new subsection (h) of Section 205 of the Federal Power Act to a standalone new Section 224, and the terminology shifted from 'best-available transmission conductor standard' to 'best-available transmission conductor class,' reflecting a shift from individual conductor evaluation to a designated class system.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
17
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Sep 16, 2026
Committee
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
upper
Sep 15, 2026
Introduced
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5662)
lower
Sep 15, 2026
Lower · Passed
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
lower
Sep 15, 2026
Introduced
Mr. Guthrie moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
lower
Sep 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-824.
lower
Jul 21, 2026
Introduced
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 49 - 0.
lower
Jul 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
lower
Jul 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
lower
Jun 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
lower
Jun 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
lower
Dec 11, 2025
Committee
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
lower
Dec 11, 2025
Committee
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.
lower
Dec 11, 2025
Introduced
Introduced in House
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors

Sponsors