U.S. House District 1
2022 general election. Election concluded.
Incumbents
No incumbent is running.
Challengers
Campaign finance
Federal Election Commission filings for the 2022 two-year cycle. Candidates appear in the order they are listed on this page. They are not ranked by money, and these measures are never combined into a single score.
| Candidate | Total receipts | Cash on hand | Direct PAC receipts |
|---|---|---|---|
| John Larson Democratic FEC data through Dec 31, 2022 | $1,840,867 | $364,470 | $1,202,385 |
| Larry Lazor Republican FEC data through Dec 7, 2022 | $190,652 | $0 | $8,100 |
Each measure below has its own scale and starts at zero, so bars can be read against each other within a measure but not across measures. Each candidate's own coverage end date is in the table above.
Total receipts
Everything the authorized campaign committee took in, including contributions, loans, and transfers.
Highest total receipts: John Larson at $1,840,867. Lowest: Larry Lazor at $190,652. The largest reported value sets this scale at $1,840,867.
Cash on hand
The balance the campaign reported at the end of its coverage period.
Highest cash on hand: John Larson at $364,470. Lowest: Larry Lazor at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $364,470.
Direct PAC receipts
Money the campaign received from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.
Highest direct PAC receipts: John Larson at $1,202,385. Lowest: Larry Lazor at $8,100. The largest reported value sets this scale at $1,202,385.
Outside spending supporting
Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate, not coordinated with the campaign and never received by it.
Every compared candidate reported $0 for outside spending supporting. The largest reported value sets this scale at $0.
Outside spending opposing
Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.
Every compared candidate reported $0 for outside spending opposing. The largest reported value sets this scale at $0.
Where each campaign's committee money came from
Each column is one candidate and each figure is that candidate's own money, taken over that candidate's own itemized total. Nothing here is added across candidates, and the two groupings below are never added to each other: the first is who the FEC says runs the giving committee, which covers every dollar, and the second is what interest a source says that committee advances, which is a claim MyRepTracker makes and covers only part of the money.
Contributions each campaign received, by who runs the committee
| Category | John Larson Democratic | Larry Lazor Republican |
|---|---|---|
| Corporate PACs | $547,80044.2% | $0 |
| Trade association PACs | $228,40018.4% | $0 |
| Labor union PACs | $136,50011.0% | $0 |
| Membership organization PACs | $125,60010.1% | $6,00074.1% |
| Non-connected committees | $88,4347.1% | $1001.2% |
| Leadership PACs | $41,0003.3% | $2,00024.7% |
| Corporations without capital stock | $35,0002.8% | $0 |
| Other candidates' committees | $22,5001.8% | $0 |
| Cooperative PACs | $15,0001.2% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $1,240,234 | $8,100 |
Contributions each campaign received, by interest advanced
| Category | John Larson Democratic | Larry Lazor Republican |
|---|---|---|
| Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate | $203,50017.3% | $0 |
| Securities and investment Finance, insurance, and real estate | $84,0007.1% | $0 |
| Defense Defense | $67,5005.7% | $0 |
| Physicians and medical specialties Health | $61,5005.2% | $6,00098.4% |
| Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate | $55,5004.7% | $0 |
| Public sector unions Labor | $55,0004.7% | $0 |
| Industrial unions Labor | $35,5003.0% | $0 |
| Health insurance Health | $33,0002.8% | $0 |
| Pharmaceuticals Health | $33,0002.8% | $0 |
| Transportation unions Labor | $31,5002.7% | $0 |
| Commercial banking Finance, insurance, and real estate | $30,0002.5% | $0 |
| Telecommunications Communications and technology | $30,0002.5% | $0 |
| Construction Construction | $29,0002.5% | $0 |
| Food and beverage Agriculture | $24,3002.1% | $0 |
| Technology Communications and technology | $22,7001.9% | $0 |
| Automotive Transportation | $22,5001.9% | $0 |
| Hospitals and nursing homes Health | $21,0001.8% | $0 |
| Air transport Transportation | $20,0001.7% | $0 |
| Trucking Transportation | $18,5001.6% | $0 |
| Electric utilities Energy and natural resources | $12,5001.1% | $0 |
| Pro-Israel Ideological and single-issue | $12,0001.0% | $0 |
| Credit unions Finance, insurance, and real estate | $11,0000.9% | $0 |
| Lawyers and law firms Professional services | $10,0000.8% | $0 |
| Accounting Professional services | $9,5000.8% | $0 |
| Agribusiness Agriculture | $9,0000.8% | $0 |
| Building trades unions Labor | $6,5000.6% | $0 |
| Media and entertainment Communications and technology | $6,0000.5% | $0 |
| Renewable energy Energy and natural resources | $5,0000.4% | $0 |
| Nurses and nursing specialties Health | $4,0000.3% | $0 |
| Oil and gas Energy and natural resources | $2,5000.2% | $0 |
| Mining Energy and natural resources | $1,5000.1% | $0 |
| Health care unions Labor | $2500.0% | $0 |
| Committees not yet categorized | $208,98417.8% | $1001.6% |
| Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees | $63,500 | $2,000 |
| Itemized total | $1,240,234 | $8,100 |
Last-minute contributions reported before an election
Within 48 hours of receiving a contribution or loan of $1,000 or more in the days just before an election, a campaign must notify the FEC. These notices are provisional: the same money appears again in the regular report covering those days, so it is not added to the amounts above and is not compared as a measure. Candidates file them only while their own election is close, so an absence here says nothing about a campaign's fundraising.
| Candidate | Reported on notices | Notices | Covers | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Larson Democratic | $109,400 | 17 | Apr 20 to Nov 5, 2022 | Covered by regular reports |
Candidates not compared
These candidates are left out of the comparison rather than shown as zero, because a missing or partial record is not the same as no money.
- Mary Sanders (Green): No FEC data is stored for cycle 2022.
Direct contributions are money the campaign received. Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with any campaign, and are never added to a candidate's receipts. Source: Federal Election Commission ↗.